The Associations Between Sensory Processing Sensitivity and the Big Five Personality Traits in a Japanese Sample
Abstract
Abstract. Sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) is a temperament trait characterized by deeper processing of sensory information, being easily overstimulated, stronger emotional reactivity, and more awareness of subtle stimuli. Many studies on Western samples have associated SPS and/or its three components (i.e., low sensory threshold [LST], ease of excitation [EOE], and aesthetic sensitivity [AES]) with the Big Five personality traits, but cultural factors may influence these relationships. This study surveyed a Japanese sample (N = 1,626) to investigate the associations. Bivariate correlation analyses found that AES had a negatively weak correlation with neuroticism, while it was positively correlated with openness (strongly), extraversion, agreeableness (moderately), and conscientiousness (weakly). LST and EOE had strong positive correlations with neuroticism and moderate negative or weak correlations with the other four traits. The canonical correlation analysis revealed commonality between the constructs of about 55%. While some results were consistent with those of the former studies, others were not. The results contrary to studies on Western samples might be explained by the differences between collectivist and individualist cultures, biological differences, and/or measurement weaknesses.
References
1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345
(2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434213
(2020). Genetic architecture of Environmental Sensitivity reflects multiple heritable components: A twin study with adolescents. Molecular Psychiatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0783-8
(2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017376
(2010). Culture-gene coevolution of individualism-collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1650
(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
(2019). Exploring individual and interpersonal level factors associated with academic success of college students at a women’s, faith-based higher institution. Higher Education Studies, 9, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p86
(2008). High sensory-processing sensitivity at work. International Journal of Stress Management, 15, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.15.2.189
(2012). Sensory-processing sensitivity predicts performance on a visual search task followed by an increase in perceived stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 496–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.019
(1990). An alternative “Description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
(2019). Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009
(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, bahaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, Sage Publications.
(2016). Sensory processing sensitivity and serotonin gene variance: Insights into mechanisms shaping environmental sensitivity. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.029
(2020). Highly sensitive adolescent benefits in positive school transitions: Evidence for vantage sensitivity in Japanese high-schoolers. Developmental Psychology, 56, 1565–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000991
(2019). Psychometric properties and validation of a German High Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35, 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000411
(2020). Serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) variation and sensory processing sensitivity – comparison with other anxiety-related temperamental dimensions. Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine, 8, Article e1352. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1352
(2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational Psychiatry, 8, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6
(2019). Sensory processing sensitivity and its association with personality traits and affect: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.05.013
(2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008
(2012). Development of a short form of the Japanese Big-Five Scale, and a test of its reliability and validity. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 83, 91–99 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.83.91
(2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologists, 61, 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622
(2018). Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Developmental Psychology, 54, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000406
(2008). A General Factor of Personality (GFP) from two meta-analyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Schullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 679–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.015
(2020). Exploring the multidimensional structure of sensory processing sensitivity in Turkish samples. Current Psychology, 39, 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9751-0
(2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_09
(2016). An introduction to the statistical free software HAD: Suggestions to improve teaching, learning, and practice data analysis. Journal of Media, Information, and Communication, 1, 59–73 (in Japanese).
(2006). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five”. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022
(2015). Trait sensory-processing sensitivity and subjective well-being: Distinctive associations for different aspects of sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.045
(2016). Development of Japanese version of the 19-item Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-J19). Japanese Journal of Research on Emotions, 23, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.4092/jsre.23.2_68 (in Japanese).
(2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135200
(2019). Relationship between sensory-processing sensitivity and age in a large cross-sectional Japanese sample. Heliyon, 5, Article e02508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02508
(2018). The relationships among daily exercise, sensory-processing sensitivity, and depressive tendency in Japanese university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.047
(