Skip to main content
Original Article

Re-conceptualizing Machiavellianism and Social-Cognitive Skills

Machiavellianism Blends Deficient, Proficient, and Average Social-Cognitive Skills

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000340

Abstract. Machiavellianism is presumed to encompass advanced social-cognitive skill, but research has generally suggested that Machiavellian individuals are rather deficient in social-cognitive skill. However, previous research on the matter has been limited to measures of (a) Machiavellianism that are unidimensional and saturated with both antagonism and disinhibition and measures (b) only one type of social-cognitive skill. Using a large college sample (N = 461), we examined how various dimensions of Machiavellianism relate to two types of social-cognitive skill: person-perception skill and general social prediction skill. Consistent with some prior theorizing, the planful dimension of Machiavellianism was positively related to both person-perception and general social prediction skills; antagonistic dimensions of Machiavellianism were negatively related to both skills; either agentic or cynical dimensions of Machiavellianism were generally unrelated to both skills. Overall, the current evidence suggests a complicated relationship between Machiavellianism and social-cognitive skill because Machiavellianism encompasses features that blend deficiency, proficiency, and average levels of social-cognitive skills.

References

  • Ali, F., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). Investigating theory of mind deficits in nonclinical psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(3), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.027 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Austin, E. J., Farrelly, D., Black, C., & Moore, H. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side? Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Dietvorst, R. C., Belschak, F. D., van den Berg, W. E., & Rietdijk, W. J. R. (2013). Theory of mind and empathic explanations of Machiavellianism: A neuroscience perspective. Journal of Management, 39(7), 1760–1798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471393 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021963001006643 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blair, R. J. R. (2007). The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(9), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blair, R. J. R., Colledge, E., Murray, L., & Mitchell, D. G. V. (2001). A selective impairment in the processing of sad and fearful expressions in children with psychopathic tendencies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012225108281 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism, Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Collison, K. L., Vize, C. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2018). Development and preliminary validation of a Five Factor Model measure of Machiavellianism. Psychological Assessment, 30(10), 1401–1407. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000637 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Czibor, A., & Bereczkei, T. (2012). Machiavellian perople’s success results from monitoring their partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabriel, M. T., Critelli, J. W., & Ee, J. S. (1994). Narcissistic illusions in self-evaluations of intelligence and attractiveness. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00798.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2018). Social psychological skill and its correlates. Social Psychology, 49(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000332 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, A., Martel, C., McPartland, J. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2019). Autism spectrum traits predict higher social psychological skill. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 116(39), 19245–19247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911460116 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach, The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Harmon-Jones, E., & Gable, P. A. (2009). Neural activity underlying the effect of approach-motivated positive affect on narrowed attention. Psychological Science, 20(4), 406–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02302.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hart, W., Tortoriello, G. K., Richardson, K., & Breeden, C. J. (2019). Profiles and profile comparisons between Dark Triad constructs on self-presentation tactic usage and tactic beliefs. Journal of Personality, 87(3), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12411 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hawley, P. H. (2006). Evolution and personality: A new look at Machiavellianism. In D. MroczekT. LittleEds., Handbook of personality development (pp. 147–161). Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N. (2016). The nature of Machiavellianism: Distinct patterns of misbehavior. In V. Zeigler-HillD. K. MarcusEds., The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology (pp. 87–107). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14854-005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. LearyR. H. HoyleEds., Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. SulsEd., Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231–261). Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kosmitzki, C., & John, O. P. (1993). The implicit use of explicit conceptions of social intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90037-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lyons, M., Caldwell, T., & Schultz, S. (2010). Mind-reading and manipulation: Is Machiavellianism related to theory of mind? Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.8.2010.3.7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? American Psychologist, 63(6), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.503 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., Qian, S., & Pollack, J. M. (2019). The relationship between emotional intelligence and the Dark Triad personality traits: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Hyatt, C. S., Maples-Keller, J. L., Carter, N. T., & Lynam, D. R. (2017). Psychopathy and Machiavellianism: A distinction without a difference? Journal of Personality, 85(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12251 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Monaghan, C., Bizumic, B., Williams, T., & Sellbom, M. (2020). Two-dimensional Machiavellianism: Conceptualization, theory, and measurements of the views and tactics dimensions. Psychological Assessment, 32(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000784 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Orosz, A., & Bereczkei, T. (2015). The Machiavellians’ emotional intelligence in social interaction. Hungarian Psychological Review, 70(1), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1556/0016.2015.70.1.3 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paal, T., & Bereczkei, T. (2007). Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.021 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silvera, D. H., Martinussen, M., & Dahl, T. I. (2001). The Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00242 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sinclair, R. C., & Mark, M. M. (1995). The effects of mood state on judgmental accuracy: Processing strategy as a mechanism. Cognition and Emotion, 9(5), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939508408974 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trémolière, B., & Djeriouat, H. (2016). The sadistic trait predicts minimization of intention and causal responsibility in moral judgment. Cognition, 146, 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Zwieten, A., Meyer, J., Hermens, D. F., Hickie, I. B., Hawes, D. J., Glozier, N., Naismith, S. L., Scott, E. M., Lee, R. S. C., & Guastella, A. J. (2013). Social cognition deficits and psychopathic traits in young people seeking mental health treatment. PLoS One, 8(7), Article e67753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067753 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vonk, J., Zeigler-Hill, V., Ewing, D., Mercer, S., & Noser, A. E. (2015). Mindreading in the dark: Dark personality features and theory of mind. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.025 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vonk, J., Zeigler-Hill, V., Mayhew, P., & Mercer, S. (2013). Mirror, mirror on the wall, which form of narcissist knows self and others best of all? Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.285 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar