Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Research Article

Two of a Kind or Distant Relatives?

A Multimethod Investigation of the Overlap Between Personality Traits and Character Strengths

Published Online:June 01, 2023https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000400

Abstract

Abstract: Allport’s distinction of personality devaluated (personality) and personality evaluated (character) raised the question of whether the character is redundant with personality, which still remains open today. The present study hence compares the Five-Factor Model of personality and the VIA-classification (Values in Action) of character strengths across two methods (self- and peer-reports) and two levels of abstraction (domains/factors and scales/facets). A sample of 152 participants and 152 peer-raters completed the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised and the VIA Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS). Personality and character assessed with these inventories were found to strongly overlap, yet the different operationalizations were rarely redundant (except for three personality facets). Multitrait-multimethod analyses mostly supported the convergent and discriminant validity of personality and character. Interpersonal strengths (e.g., teamwork) and abstract character factors lacked discriminant validity to personality facets. The present investigation contributes to a better understanding of the interplay between personality and character and provides an impetus for future research on the “virtue gap” between devaluated and evaluated personality traits.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1921). Personality and character. Psychological Bulletin, 18(9), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0066265 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Allport, G. W. (1927). Concepts of trait and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073629 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. No. 211. Psychological Review Monographs. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Aluri, J. T., & Li, K. C. (2022). Personality and character: A comparative qualitative analysis of trait descriptions in NEO-PI-3 and character strengths and virtues. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 3055–3094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00535-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anglim, J., & Grant, S. L. (2014). Incremental criterion prediction of personality facets over factors: Obtaining unbiased estimates and confidence intervals. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carretero-Dios, H., Eid, M., & Ruch, W. (2011). Analyzing multitrait-mulitmethod data with multilevel confirmatory factor analysis: An application to the validation of the State-Trait Cheerfulness Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.12.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory. Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr, McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2019). Personality across the life span. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 423–448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103244 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dametto, D. M., & Noronha, A. P. P. (2021). Study between personality traits and character strengths in adolescents. Current Psychology, 40, 2067–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0146-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Macdonald, C., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2008). Values in Action Scale and the Big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGrath, R. E. (2014). Scale- and item-level factor analyses of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. Assessment, 21, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112450612 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGrath, R. E., Hall-Simmonds, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2020). Are measures of character and personality distinct? Evidence from observed-score and true-score analyses. Assessment, 27, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117738047 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nicholson, I. A. M. (1998). Gordon Allport, character, and the “culture of personality”. History of Psychology, 1(1), 52–68. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Noftle, E. E., Schnitker, S. A., & Robins, R. W. (2011). Character and personality: Connections between positive psychology and personality psychology. In K. M. SheldonT. B. KashdanM. F. StegerEds., Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 207–227). Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-PI-R. NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae. Revidierte Fassung. Manual [NEO-PI-R. The Costa and McCrae’s NEO-personality inventory. Revised version. The manual]. Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Assessment of character strengths. In G. P. KoocherJ. C. NorcrossS. S. Hill IIIEds., Psychologists’ desk reference (2nd ed., pp. 93–98). Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press; American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Adaptation and validation of the German version of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000022 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stahlmann, A. G., & Ruch, W. (2020). Scrutinizing the criteria for character strengths: Laypersons assert that every strength is positively morally valued, even in the absence of tangible outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 591028. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar