Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Research Article – Extended

Isolated But Not Necessarily Lonely

An Exploratory Analysis of Subjective Isolation and Conspiracist Ideation

Published Online:March 19, 2024https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000420

Abstract

Abstract: Previous research points to social/affiliative needs as playing an important role in orienting people towards conspiratorial thinking. Yet no research to date has compared the relative contribution of different forms of subjective interpersonal isolation to general conspiracist ideation (CI). Four studies (N = 2,452) compare the associations between three forms of subjective isolation (loneliness, existential isolation, alienation/anomie) and CI. Results from Studies 1–3 indicate that existential isolation and alienation, but not loneliness, independently predict higher CI over and above other relevant predictors. Study 4 found that after controlling for relevant covariates, only anomie predicted CI. Exploratory analyses revealed that unique effects of existential isolation on CI emerged when the breakdown of the leadership subdimension of anomie was excluded from the model. Implications of the four studies are discussed.

References

  • Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in Conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Badcock, J. C., Barkus, E., Cohen, A. S., Bucks, R., & Badcock, D. R. (2016). Loneliness and schizotypy are distinct constructs, separate from general psychopathology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1018. https://doi.org/110.3389/fpsyg.2016.01018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brotherton, R, & French, CC (2015). Intention seekers: Conspiracist ideation and biased attributions of intentionality. PLoS One, 10(5), Article e0124125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124125 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Butter, M., & Knight, P. (2018). Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them. Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M., Berntson, G. G., Nouriani, B., & Spiegel, D. (2006). Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 1054–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campitelli, G., & Gerrans, P. (2014). Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M., & Littvay, L. (2020). An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919833176 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., Golec de Zavala, A., & Olechowski, M. (2016). “They will not control us”: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12158 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Constantino, M. J., Sommer, R. K., Goodwin, B. J., Coyne, A. E., & Pinel, E. C. (2019). Existential isolation as a correlate of clinical distress, beliefs about psychotherapy, and experiences with mental health treatment. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 29(4), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000172 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cowburn, A. (2016, June 21). A third of leave voters believe MI5 and the remain camp. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/eu-referendum-poll-brexit-live-leave-voters-mi5-conspiracy-government-a7092806.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Davidson, C. A., Hoffman, L., & Spaulding, W. D. (2016). Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire – Brief Revised (updated): An update of norms, factor structure, and item content in a large non-clinical young adult sample. Psychiatry Research, 238, 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.053 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, J., Wetherell, G., & Henry, P. J. (2018). Social devaluation of African Americans and race-related conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 999–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2531 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2010). The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: Tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. European Journal of Ageing, 7(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0144-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dean, D. G. (1961). Alienation: Its meaning and measurement. American Sociological Review, 26(5), 753–758. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of princess Diana. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.2.210-222 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Durkheim, E. (2013). Suicide (Illustrated ed.), Snowball Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erisen, C., Guidi, M., Martini, S., Toprakkiran, S., Isernia, P., & Littvay, L. (2021). Psychological correlates of populist attitudes. Political Psychology, 42(Suppl 1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12768 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Federico, C. M., Williams, A. L., & Vitriol, J. A. (2018). The role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 927–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2495 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Galgali, M. S., & Helm, P. J. (2023, November 21). Isolation and Conspiracy Beliefs: Looking at associations between different types of isolation and conspiracy orientation [Data]. https://osf.io/2r9e5/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Galgali, M.S., Helm, P.J., & Arndt, J. (2023). Feeling too isolated to be vaccinated? The contributing role of subjective interpersonal isolation factors towards COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance. Social Science & Medicine, 323, Article 115865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115865 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haupt, A. (2020, October 19). Conspiracy theories: Why some people are susceptible and how to protect yourself. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/wellness/why-uncertain-times-make-us-susceptible-to-conspiracy-theories–and-how-to-protect-yourself/2020/10/16/21becf08-0f1a-11eb-8a35-237ef1eb2ef7_story.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: on the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heiss, R., Gell, S., Röthlingshöfer, E., & Zoller, C. (2021). How threat perceptions relate to learning and conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19: Evidence from a panel study. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, Article 110672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110672 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Helm, P. J., Greenberg, J., Park, Y. C., & Pinel, E. C. (2019). Feeling alone in your subjectivity: Introducing the State Trait Existential Isolation Model (STEIM). Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(3), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.41 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Helm, P. J., Jimenez, T., Bultmann, M., Lifshin, U., Greenberg, J., & Arndt, J. (2020). Existential isolation, loneliness, and attachment in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 159, Article 109890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109890 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Helm, P. J., Rothschild, L. G., Greenberg, J., & Croft, A. (2018). Explaining sex differences in existential isolation research. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.032 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hornsey, M. J., Chapman, C. M., Alvarez, B., Bentley, S., Salvador Casara, B. G., Crimston, C. R., Ionescu, O., Krug, H., Preya Selvanathan, H., Steffens, N. K., & Jetten, J. (2021). To what extent are conspiracy theorists concerned for self versus others? A COVID-19 test case. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2737 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hutson, M. (2017). Conspiracy theorists may really just be lonely. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/conspiracy-theorists-may-really-just-be-lonely/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2021). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896491 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. K. (2017). Too special to be duped: Need for uniqueness motivates conspiracy beliefs: Need for uniqueness and conspiracies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2265 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Islam, M. S., Kamal, A.-H. M., Kabir, A., Southern, D. L., Khan, S. H., Hasan, S. M. M., Sarkar, T., Sharmin, S., Das, S., Roy, T., Harun, M. G. D., Chughtai, A. A., Homaira, N., & Seale, H. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence. PLoS One, 16(5), Article e0251605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251605 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning (Vol. 103). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jolley, D., & Paterson, J. L. (2020). Pylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 628–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12394 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kalekin-Fishman, D., & Langman, L. (2015). Alienation: The critique that refuses to disappear. Current Sociology, 63(6), 916–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115591612 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1965). On alienation. Inquiry, 8(1–4), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201746508601429 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lance, C. E., Lance, C. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in organizational and social sciences. Routledge. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leone, L., Giacomantonio, M., & Lauriola, M. (2019). Moral foundations, worldviews, moral absolutism and belief in conspiracy theories. International Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12459 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liekefett, L., Christ, O., & Becker, J. C. (2023). Can conspiracy beliefs be beneficial? Longitudinal linkages between conspiracy beliefs, anxiety, uncertainty aversion, and existential threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211060965 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12681 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lynn, M., & Snyder, C. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In C. R. SnyderS. J. LopezEds., Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395–410). Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Kossowska, M. (2018). Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2308 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1988). The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 and the Communist Manifesto (M. Milligan, Trans.; 1st ed., 1st ed.). Prometheus. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084686 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moulding, R., Nix-Carnell, S., Schnabel, A., Nedeljkovic, M., Burnside, E. E., Lentini, A. F., & Mehzabin, N. (2016). Better the devil you know than a world you don't? Intolerance of uncertainty and worldview explanations for belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.060 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ohlheiser, A. (2020, December 2). The election is over, but voter fraud conspiracies aren’t going away. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/12/02/1012828/the-election-is-over-but-voter-fraud-conspiracies-arent-going-away/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006999 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peplau, L. A., & Pearlman, D. (1982). Perspective on loneliness. In L. A. PeplauD. PerlmanEds., Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1–18). Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pinel, E. C., Helm, P. J., Yawger, G. C., Long, A. E., & Scharnetzki, L. (2022). Feeling out of (existential) place: Existential isolation and nonnormative group membership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(4), 990–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221999084 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pinel, E. C., Long, A. E., Murdoch, E. Q., & Helm, P. (2017). A prisoner of one’s own mind: Identifying and understanding existential isolation. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.024 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Poon, K.-T., Chen, Z., & Wong, W.-Y. (2020). Beliefs in conspiracy theories following ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219898944 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.160 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schöpfer, C., Abatista, A. G. F., Fuhrer, J., & Cova, F. (2023). “Where there are villains, there will be heroes”: Belief in conspiracy theories as an existential tool to fulfill need for meaning. Personality and Individual Differences, 200, Article 111900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111900 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 783–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088565 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Srole, L. (1956). Social integration and certain corollaries: An exploratory study. American Sociological Review, 21(6), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088422 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stanton, Z. (2020, June 17). You’re living in the golden age of conspiracy theories. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/17/conspiracy-theories-pandemic-trump-2020-election-coronavirus-326530 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stojanov, A., & Halberstadt, J. (2019). The Conspiracy Mentality Scale: Distinguishing between irrational and rational suspicion. Social Psychology, 50(4), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000381 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017457 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1583 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Teymoori, A., Bastian, B., & Jetten, J. (2017). Towards a psychological analysis of anomie. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12377 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Teymoori, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., Ariyanto, A., Autin, F., Ayub, N., Badea, C., Besta, T., Butera, F., Costa-Lopes, R., Cui, L., Fantini, C., Finchilescu, G., Gaertner, L., Gollwitzer, M., Gómez, Á., González, R., Hong, Y. Y., Jensen, D. H., … Wohl, M. (2016). Revisiting the measurement of anomie. PLoS One, 11(7), Article e0158370. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158370 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007622 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thorlindsson, T., & Bernburg, J. G. (2004). Durkheim’s theory of social order and deviance: A multi-level test. European Sociological Review, 20(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jch025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2015). RWA Web: A free, comprehensive, web-based, and user-friendly tool for relative weight analyses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9351-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Travis, R. (1993). The MOS Alienation Scale: An alternative to Srole’s Anomia Scale. Social Indicators Research, 28(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086717 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2017). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories: Education and conspiracy beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Acker, M. (2015). The influence of control on belief in conspiracy theories: Conceptual and applied extensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3161 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Prooijen, J.-W., Cohen Rodrigues, T., Bunzel, C., Georgescu, O., Komáromy, D., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2022). Populist gullibility: Conspiracy theories, news credibility, bullshit receptivity, and paranormal belief. Political Psychology, 43(6), 1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12802 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weber, M. (1946). Essays in sociology. H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weller, J. A., Dieckmann, N. F., Tusler, M., Mertz, C. K., Burns, W. J., & Peters, E. (2013). Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch analysis approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1751 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159845 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xiao, X., Borah, P., & Su, Y. (2021). The dangers of blind trust: Examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs. Public Understanding of Science, 30(8), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521998025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar