Beyond Procedure’s Content
The Role of Accessibility Experiences and Personal Uncertainty in Procedural Justice Judgments
Abstract
Procedural justice concerns play a critical role in economic settings, politics, and other domains of human life. Despite the vast evidence corroborating their relevance, considerably less is known about how procedural justice judgments are formed. Whereas earlier theorizing focused on the systematic integration of content information, the present contribution provides a new perspective on the formation of justice judgments by examining the influence of accessibility experiences. Specifically, we hypothesize that procedural justice judgments may be formed based on the ease or difficulty with which justice-relevant information comes to mind. Three experiments corroborate this prediction in that procedures were evaluated less positively when the retrieval of associated unfair aspects was easy compared to difficult. Presumably this is because when it feels easy (difficult) to retrieve unfair aspects, these are perceived as frequent (infrequent), and hence the procedure as unjust (just). In addition to demonstrating that ease-of-retrieval may influence justice judgments, the studies further revealed that reliance on accessibility experiences is high in conditions of personal certainty. We suggest that this is because personal uncertainty fosters systematic processing of content information, whereas personal certainty may invite less taxing judgmental strategies such as reliance on ease-of-retrieval.
References
(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(2001). How do I know that’s fair? A categorization approach to fairness judgments. In , Emerging perspectives on values in organizations (pp. 35–62). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
(2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491–500.
(1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In , Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. In , The construction of social judgments (pp. 133–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.
(2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.
(2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
(2006). Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 211–228.
(2005). Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 157–173.
(1999). When recollective experiences matter: Subjective ease of retrieval and stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 760–768.
(1998). Integrating cognitive and motivational factors in depression: Initial tests of a goal-orientation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 139–158.
(1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.
(2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In , Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
(2006). Losing sleep over organizational injustice: Attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 58–69.
(2007). Relying on accessible content versus accessibility experiences: The case of processing capacity. Social Cognition, 25, 853–881.
(2008). Depression and reliance on ease-of-retrieval experiences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 213–230.
(2010). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1088868310367640
(1999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 771–782.
(2008). It’s the difference that counts: Expectancy/experience discrepancy moderates the use of ease of retrieval in attitude judgments. Social Cognition, 26, 447–468.
(2005). Uncertainty, social identity, and ideology. In , Advances in group processes, Vol. 22, New York, NY: Elsevier.
(1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.
(2010). Manipulation-checks as manipulation: Another look at the ease-of-retrieval heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 47–58.
(1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In , Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
(1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. In , Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 20, (pp. 255–295). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472–488.
(2010). Shaping cooperation behavior: The role of accessibility experiences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 178–187.
(2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.
(1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053–1064.
(2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211.
(1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87–99.
(2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332–348.
(1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.
(2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.
(1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
(1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
(2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.
(2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931–941.
(2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 482–498.
(2006). Uncertainty management after reorganizations: The ameliorative effect of outcome fairness on job uncertainty. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 19, 75–86.
(2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(2009). The social psychology of fairness and the regulation of personal uncertainty. In , Handbook of the uncertain self (pp. 122–141). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2001). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In , Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (Vol. 2, pp. 49–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1105–1113.
(1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes?. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 170–177.
