Abstract
Two studies investigated the different contribution of positive and negative associations to the size of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) effect. A Many-Facet Rasch Measurement analysis was applied for the purpose. Across different IATs (Race and Weight) and different groups of respondents (White, Normal weight, and Obese people) we observed that positive words increase the IAT effect whereas negative words tend to decrease it. Results suggest that the IAT is influenced by a positive associations primacy effect. As a consequence, we argue that researchers should be careful when interpreting IAT effects as a measure of implicit prejudice.
References
1978). A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.
(1988). Rasch models for measurement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
. (2005). The Rasch model explained. In , Applied Rasch measurement: A book of exemplars (pp. 308–328). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer-Kluwer.
(2009). The sorting paired features task. A measure of association strengths. Experimental Psychology, 56, 329–343.
(2006). Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 163–176.
(2008). Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 977–997.
(2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
. (1999). Assessing dependence among subjects’ responses. Mathematical Social Sciences, 38, 259–274.
(2007). Assessing change with the extended logistic model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 60, 367–375.
(2003). On wildebeests and humans: The preferential detection of negative stimuli. Psychological Science, 14, 14–18.
(2008). Adolphe Quetelet (1796–1874) – the average man and indices of obesity. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 23, 47–51.
(1995). Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
. (2002). What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49, 171–180.
(1999). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 669–687.
(2004). Reversing or eliminating IAT effects by changing the affective valence of the stimulus items. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 357–365.
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
(2003). Facing prejudice: Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science, 14, 640–643.
(2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32.
(2004). Is there a real preferential detection of negative stimuli? A comment on Dijksterhuis and Aarts (2003). Psychological Science, 15, 364–365.
(2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV. What we know (so far) about the method. In , Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies (pp. 59–102). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(1989). Many-facet Rasch measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
. (2009a). Facets Rasch measurement computer program (Version 3.66.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
(2009b). Winsteps (Version 3.68.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
(2002). Construction of measures from many-facet data. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 486–512.
(1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.
(2003). Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 455–469.
(2003). Detecting and measuring rater effects using many facet Rasch measurement: Part I. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 386–422.
(2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 161–176.
(2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101–115.
(2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180.
(2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88.
(2010). Prejudice Implicit Association Test effects. The role of self-related heuristics. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 218, 44–50.
(1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment test. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research. Reprinted, 1980. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
(2008). Assessing the impact of replication on implicit association test effect by means of the extended logistic model for the assessment of change. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 954–960.
(2002). Multidimensional Rasch measurement via item component models and faceted designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 42–56.
(2001). “Unlearning” automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 856–868.
(1999). Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 17, 437–465.
(2009). The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 56, 283–294.
(2001). Items’ cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 123–134.
(2010). Does the Name – Race Implicit Association Test measure racial prejudice? Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000093.
(2010). The many-facet Rasch model in the analysis of the Go/No-Go association task. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 944–956.
(2004). Single target implicit associations. Unpublished manuscript, Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Raboud University.
(1996). Reliability and separation. Rasch measurement transactions, 9, 472.
(1969). A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 23–48.
(