Facial Likability and Smiling Enhance Cooperation, but Have No Direct Effect on Moralistic Punishment
Abstract
Abstract. The present study serves to test how positive and negative appearance-based expectations affect cooperation and punishment. Participants played a prisoner’s dilemma game with partners who either cooperated or defected. Then they were given a costly punishment option: They could spend money to decrease the payoffs of their partners. Aggregated over trials, participants spent more money for punishing the defection of likable-looking and smiling partners compared to punishing the defection of unlikable-looking and nonsmiling partners, but only because participants were more likely to cooperate with likable-looking and smiling partners, which provided the participants with more opportunities for moralistic punishment. When expressed as a conditional probability, moralistic punishment did not differ as a function of the partners’ facial likability. Smiling had no effect on the probability of moralistic punishment, but punishment was milder for smiling in comparison to nonsmiling partners.
References
2012). On the flexibility of social source memory: A test of the emotional incongruity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1512–1529. doi: 10.1037/a0028219
(2010). Enhanced old-new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game. Cognition, 117, 261–275. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.020
(2013). Memory for reputational trait information: Is social–emotional information processing less flexible in old age? Psychology and Aging, 28, 984–995. doi: 10.1037/a0034266
(2016). Event-related potentials in response to cheating and cooperation in a social dilemma game. Psychophysiology, 53, 216–228. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12561
(1925). Zusammenfassende Betrachtungen über die erblichen Blutstrukturen des Menschen.
([Summarizing consideration on the inheritable blood structure of mankind] Zeitschrift für Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre, 37, 237–270. doi: 10.1007/BF017633332002).
(Smile asymmetries and reputation as reliable indicators of likelihood to cooperate: An evolutionary analysis . In S. P. ShohovEd., Advances in psychology research (pp. 59–78). Huntington, NY: Nova Science.2007). The demand for punishment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62, 522–542. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.05.004
(2006). Can second-order punishment deter perverse punishment? Experimental Economics, 9, 265–279. doi: 10.1007/s10683-006-9127-z
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2009). The Alliance Hypothesis for Human Friendship. PLoS One, 4, e5802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005802
(2003).
(The human face of game theory: Trust and reciprocity in sequential games . In E. OstromJ. M. WalkerEds., Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research (pp. 245–274). New York, NY: Sage.2007). Implicit trustworthiness decisions: Automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1508–1519. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1508
(2009). Multinomial processing tree models. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 108–124. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108
(2005). Driving forces behind informal sanctions. Econometrica, 73, 2017–2030. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00644.x
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
(2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140. doi: 10.1038/415137a
(2012). Does facial resemblance enhance cooperation? PLoS One, 7, e47809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047809
(1981). Smiling, appeasement, and the silent bared-teeth display. Ethology and Sociobiology, 2, 127–133. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(81)90025-X
(2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319, 1362–1367. doi: 10.1126/science.1153808
(2010). One-reason decision making unveiled: A measurement model of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 123–134. doi: 10.1037/a0017518
(2007). The abstract selection task: New data and an almost comprehensive model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 680–703. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.680
(2013). Sex, cheating, and disgust: Enhanced source memory for trait information that violates gender stereotypes. Memory, 21, 167–181. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.713971
(1977). Smiling and laughter: Different phyletic origins? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 183–186. doi: 10.3758/BF03329317
(2015). The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the ultimatum game: an ERP study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 1–9. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00077
(1976). Parameters of the Smile as a Social Signal. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 129, 125–130. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1976.10534019
(2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630–633. doi: 10.3758/BF03206543
(2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42–54. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.42
(2011). Defection in the dark? A randomized-response investigation of cooperativeness in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 638–644. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.793
(2013). The value of a smile: Facial expression affects ultimatum-game responses. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 381–385.
(2014). Smiling faces, sometimes they don’t tell the truth: Facial expression in the ultimatum game impacts decision making and event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 51, 358–363. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12184
(2008). Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves? Journal of Public Economics, 92, 91–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.008
(1992). “Laughter” and “smile” in Barbary Macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Ethology, 91, 220–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00864.x
(1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318–339. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.318
(2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.202
(1999). The influence of physical attractiveness and gender on ultimatum game decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 199–215. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2843
(2007). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267–273. doi: 10.3758/BF03193157
(2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 208–224. doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.012
(2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
(2006). Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 189–202. doi: 10.1177/106591290605900202
(