Skip to main content
Research Article

Stable Individual Differences in Occasion Setting

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000453

Abstract. In the current investigation, we classified participants as inhibitors or non-inhibitors depending on the extent to which they showed conditioned inhibition in a context that had been used for extinction of a conditioned response. This classification enabled us to predict participant responses in a second experiment which used a different design and a different experimental task. In the second experiment a feature-negative discrimination survived reversal training of the feature to a greater extent in the non-inhibitors than in the inhibitors and this result was supported by Bayesian analyses. We propose that the fundamental distinction between inhibitors and non-inhibitors is based on a tendency to utilize first-order (direct associations) or second-order (occasion-setting) strategies when faced with ambiguous information and that this classification is a stable individual differences attribute.

References

  • Armitage, P., Berry, G., & Matthews, J. N. S. (2002). Statistical methods in medical research. Malden, MA: Blackwell. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baeyens, F., Vervliet, B., Vansteenwegen, D., Beckers, T., Hermans, D., & Eelen, P. (2004). Simultaneous and sequential feature negative discriminations: Elemental learning and occasion setting in human Pavlovian conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 35, 136–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0023-9690(03)00058-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bouton, M. E. (1994). Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.20.3.219 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bouton, M. E., & Bolles, R. C. (1979). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear. Learning and Motivation, 10, 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(79)90057-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bouton, M. E., & King, D. A. (1983). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: Tests for the associative value of the context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.9.3.248 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Bouton, M. E., & Nelson, J. B. (1994). Context-specificity of target versus feature inhibition in a feature-negative discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.20.1.51 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Brooks, D. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1993). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates spontaneous-recovery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.19.1.77 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chapman, G. B., & Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory & Cognition, 18, 537–545. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198486 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Choy, Y., Fyer, A. J., & Lipsitz, J. D. (2007). Treatment of specific phobia in adults. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.10.002 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Conklin, C. A., & Tiffany, S. T. (2002). Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. Addiction, 97, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00014.x First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Dawe, S., & Loxton, N. J. (2004). The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.007 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Dawe, S., Rees, V. W., Mattick, R., Sitharthan, T., & Heather, N. (2002). Efficacy of moderation-oriented cue exposure for problem drinkers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.70.4.1045 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Dickinson, A., Shanks, D., & Evenden, J. (1984). Judgment of act-outcome contingency – the role of selective attribution. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 36, 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748408401502 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Drummond, D. C., & Glautier, S. (1994). A controlled trial of cue exposure treatment in alcohol dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.62.4.809 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Eagle, D. M., Baunez, C., Hutcheson, D. M., Lehmann, O., Shah, A. P., & Robbins, T. W. (2008). Stop-signal reaction-time task performance: Role of prefrontal cortex and subthalamic nucleus. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm044 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Glautier, S. (2013). Revisiting the learning curve (once again). Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00982 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Glautier, S., & Brudan, O. (2018). Preprint GlautierAndBrudan2018 Stable individual differences in occasion setting. Retrieved from https://osf.io/6haqn First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Glautier, S., Elgueta, T., & Nelson, J. B. (2013). Extinction produces context inhibition and multiple-context extinction reduces response recovery in human predictive learning. Learning & Behavior, 41, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-013-0109-7 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Glautier, S., Redhead, E., Thorwart, A., & Lachnit, H. (2010). Reduced summation with common features in causal judgments. Experimental Psychology, 57, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/A000030 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Griffiths, O., Holmes, N., & Westbrook, R. F. (2017). Compound stimulus presentation does not deepen extinction in human causal learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00120 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Havermans, R. C., Keuker, J., Lataster, T., & Jansen, A. (2005). Contextual control of extinguished conditioned performance in humans. Learning and Motivation, 36, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2004.09.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • He, Z., Cassaday, H. J., Bonardi, C., & Bibby, P. (2013). Do personality traits predict individual differences in excitatory and inhibitory learning? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00245 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • He, Z., Cassaday, H. J., Howard, R. C., Khalifa, N., & Bonardi, C. (2011). Impaired Pavlovian conditioned inhibition in offenders with personality disorders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2334–2351. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.616933 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • He, Z., Cassaday, H. J., Park, S. B. G., & Bonardi, C. (2012). When to hold that thought: An experimental study showing reduced inhibition of pre-trained associations in schizophrenia. PLoS One, 7, e42175. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042175 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Heym, N., Kantini, E., Checkley, H. L. R., & Cassaday, H. J. (2014). Tourette-like behaviors in the normal population are associated with hyperactive/impulsive ADHD-like behaviors but do not relate to deficits in conditioned inhibition or response inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00946 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Holland, P. C. (1984). Differential-effects of reinforcement of an inhibitory feature after serial and simultaneous feature negative discrimination-training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.10.4.461 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Holland, P. C. (1989). Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.15.4.311 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Holland, P. C. (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 28, 69–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60488-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holmes, N. M., Griffiths, O., & Westbrook, R. F. (2014). The influence of partner cues on the extinction of causal judgments in people. Learning & Behavior, 42, 289–303. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-014-0146-x First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kavanagh, D. J., Sitharthan, G., Young, R. M., Sitharthan, T., Saunders, J. B., Shockley, N., & Giannopoulos, V. (2006). Addition of cue exposure to cognitive-behavior therapy for alcohol misuse: A randomized trial with dysphoric drinkers. Addiction, 101, 1106–1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01488.x First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Kinder, A., & Lachnit, H. (2003). Similarity and discrimination in human Pavlovian conditioning. Psychophysiology, 40, 226–234. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Kruschke, J. K. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes the t-test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 573–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029146 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). London, UK: Elsevier/Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lachnit, H. (1988). Convergent validation of information-processing constructs with Pavlovian methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.143 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Lamarre, J., & Holland, P. C. (1987). Transfer of inhibition after serial feature negative discrimination training. Learning and Motivation, 18, 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(87)90001-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leung, H. T., Reeks, L. M., & Westbrook, R. F. (2012). Two ways to deepen extinction and the difference between them. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 38, 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030201 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Migo, E. M., Corbett, K., Graham, J., Smith, S., Tate, S., Moran, P. M., & Cassaday, H. J. (2006). A novel test of conditioned inhibition correlates with personality measures of schizotypy and reward sensitivity. Behavioural Brain Research, 168, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2005.11.021 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Morell, J. R., & Holland, P. C. (1993). Summation and transfer of negative occasion setting. Animal Learning & Behavior, 21, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213394 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, J. B., Sanjuan, M. D., Vadillo-Ruiz, S., Perez, J., & Leon, S. P. (2011). Experimental renewal in human participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020519 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–73. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination – a selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.587 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, J. M., Redhead, E. S., & George, D. N. (2002). Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.28.2.175 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Plummer, M. (2017). JAGS: Just another Gibbs sampler. Retrieved from https://sourceforge.net/projects/mcmc-jags/files/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Polack, C., Laborda, M., & Miller, R. (2012). Extinction context as a conditioned inhibitor. Learning & Behavior, 40, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-011-0039-1 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Development Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer program]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027760 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1972). “Configural” conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79, 307–317. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Evidence for a “unique stimulus” account of configural conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 331–338. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1987). Facilitation and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.13.3.250 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rescorla, R. A. (2003). Protection from extinction. Learning & Behavior, 31, 124–132. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195975 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. BlackW. F. ProkasyEds., Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–69). New York, NY: Appleton Century Crofts. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robbins, T. W., Gillan, C. M., Smith, D. G., de Wit, S., & Ersche, K. D. (2012). Neurocognitive endophenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity: Towards dimensional psychiatry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.009 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Shanks, D. R., Charles, D., Darby, R. J., & Azmi, A. (1998). Configural processes in human associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24, 1353–1378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1353 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shiban, Y., Pauli, P., & Mühlberger, A. (2013). Effect of multiple context exposure on renewal in spider phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.10.007 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Shiban, Y., Schelhorn, I., Pauli, P., & Muehlberger, A. (2015). Effect of combined multiple contexts and multiple stimuli exposure in spider phobia: A randomized clinical trial in virtual reality. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 71, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.014 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Swartzentruber, D. (1995). Modulatory mechanisms in Pavlovian conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 123–143. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03199928 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, B. L., & Ayres, J. J. B. (2004). Use of the ABA fear renewal paradigm to assess the effects of extinction with co-present fear inhibitors or excitors: Implications for theories of extinction and for treating human fears and phobias. Learning and Motivation, 35, 22–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0023-9690(03)00040-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trask, S., Thrailkill, E. A., & Bouton, M. E. (2017). Occasion setting, inhibition, and the contextual control of extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental (operant) learning. Behavioural Processes, 137, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.10.003 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 158–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, A. R., & Brandon, S. E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In R. R. MowrerS. B. KleinEds., Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 23–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weisstein, E. W. (2017). Normal difference distribution. Retrieved from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalDifferenceDistribution.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, D. A. (1995). Forms of inhibition in animal and human learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.21.2.129 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Johnson, J. L. (2000). Positive and negative patterning in human causal learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 121–138. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar