“It Doesn’t Affect Me!” – Do Immunity Beliefs Prevent Subsequent Aggression After Playing a Violent Video Game?
Abstract
Abstract: We identified participants in the United States (N = 302) who believed that they were vulnerable to becoming more aggressive after playing a violent video game (a vulnerability belief) and those who believed that playing violent video games would not make them more aggressive (an immunity belief). Participants played either a violent or a nonviolent video game and then competed with a fictional opponent in a competitive reaction time task. Results revealed that those with an immunity belief did not behave more aggressively after playing a violent video game. Unexpectedly, those with a vulnerability belief behaved less aggressively after playing a violent video game. We discuss implications for future research and media literacy education.
References
1997). External validity of “trivial” experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. General Psychology Review, 1, 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.19
(2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.772
(2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018251
(2020). APA task force report on violent video games. https://doi.org/10.1037/e502002020–001
. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
(2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(2), 138–167. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2302
(2015). Testing the reliability and validity of different measures of violent video game use in the United States, Singapore, and Germany. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000004
(2021). Solving the puzzle of null violent media effects. Psychology of Popular Media. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000361
(2015). There is broad consensus: Media researchers agree that violent media increase aggression in children, and pediatricians and parents concur. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(3), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000046
(1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development (1st ed.), Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783048
(2015). Comparing apples and oranges? Evidence for pace of action as a confound in research on digital games and aggression. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000010
(2014). Twenty-five years of research on violence in digital games and aggression: Empirical evidence, perspectives, and a debate gone astray. European Psychologist, 19(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000147
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
(2020). Reexamining the findings of the American Psychological Association’s 2015 Task Force on violent media: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1423–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927666
(2012). Protective processes: The function of young people’s implicit theories of crime in offending behaviour. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(9), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.550616
(2021). Is it only the violence? The effects of violent video game content, difficulty, and competition on aggressive behavior. Journal of Media Psychology, 33(3), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000291
(1990).
(Achievement and motivation in adolescence: A new model and data . In S. FeldmanG. ElliottEds., At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 308–329). Harvard University Press.2014). Hilgard’s modified video game paradigm. https://osf.io/3cb9m/
(2001). The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of television violence. Journal of Communication, 51, 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02881.x
(1994). Doom II: Hell on earth [Video game]. GT Interactive Software.
. (2010). Ego depletion – is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1686–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384745
(2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963
(2019). Finding common ground in meta-analysis “wars” on violent video games. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 705–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850104
(2015).
(Extensive modding for experimental game research . In P. LankoskiS. BjörkEds., Game research methods (pp. 323–340). ETC Press. https://doi.org/10.5555/2812774.28127992014). Gamers against science: The case of the violent video games debate. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1998
(2015). Social identity threat motivates science-discrediting online comments. PLoS One, 10(2), Article
(e0117476 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.01174762009).
(Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect . In J. BryantM. B. OliverEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 252–268). Routledge.2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.178
(2022). “It doesn’t affect me!” – Do immunity beliefs prevent subsequent aggression after playing a violent video game? https://osf.io/cxsrd
(1967). Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. Journal of Personality, 35(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01430.x
(2011). Shyness mindset: Applying mindset theory to the domain of inhibited social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1174–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.021
(2019). The competitive reaction time task: The development and scientific utility of a flexible laboratory aggression paradigm. Aggressive Behavior, 45(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21829
(2019). Violent video games exposure and aggression: The role of moral disengagement, anger, hostility, and disinhibition. Aggressive Behavior, 45(6), 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21860
(2014). The far-reaching effects of believing people can change: Implicit theories of personality shape stress, health, and achievement during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 867–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036335
(