Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Article

Heading Right and Judging Harsher

Spatial Orientation Toward the Right Side and Moral Judgments

Published Online:October 17, 2017https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000316

Abstract

Abstract. The term right may imply different meanings, for example, right can be the direction opposite to left, but right can also mean the opposite of wrong. In three experiments, we investigated whether orientation toward the right versus left direction can influence how individuals judge situational moral transgressions. Mental spatial orientation was manipulated by placing the text of moral transgressions on the left versus right side of the screen (Experiment 1) or by presenting different landscape pictures depicting paths that either lead to the left versus to the right (Experiments 2 and 3). In Experiment 3, we also manipulated participants’ physical spatial orientation. Results confirmed our main prediction that a mental rightward (vs. leftward) orientation can trigger relatively harsher moral judgments.

References

  • Alter, A. L. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ansorge, U. & Bohner, G. (2013). Investigating the association between valence and elevation with an implicit association task that requires upward and downward responding. Universitas Psychologica, 12, 1453–1471. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY12-5.iave First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Balasubramaniam, R. & Turvey, M. T. (2000). The handedness of postural fluctuations. Human Movement Science, 19, 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(00)00035-X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right and left handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015854 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Casasanto, D. & Dijkstra, K. (2010). Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition, 115, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohrs, J. C. & Asbrock, F. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.545 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Converse, P. E. (2000). Assessing the capacity of mass electorates. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.331 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dijkstra, K., Eerland, A., Zijlmans, J. & Post, L. S. (2012). How body balance influences political party evaluations: A Wii balance board study. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 536. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00536 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eerland, A., Guadalupe, T. M. & Zwaan, R. A. (2011). Leaning to the left makes the Eiffel Tower seem smaller: Posture-modulated estimation. Psychological Science, 22, 1511–1514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611420731 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A. & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22, 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398497 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Falbo, T. & Belk, S. S. (1985). A short scale to measure self-righteousness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4902_13 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Farias, A. R., Garrido, M. V. & Semin, G. R. (2016). Embodiment of abstract categories in space… grounding or mere compatibility effects? The case of politics. Acta Psychologica, 166, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fujikake, H., Higuchi, T., Imanaka, K. & Maloney, L. T. (2011). Directional bias in the body while walking through a doorway: Its association with attentional and motor factors. Experimental Brain Research, 210, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2621-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00415.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Giessner, S. R. & Schubert, T. W. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J. & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greene, J. & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Topics in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Güntürkün, O. (2003). Adult persistence of head-turning asymmetry. Nature, 421, 711. https://doi.org/10.1038/421711a First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haidt, J. & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haidt, J. & Hersh, M. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02489.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jahn, D. (2010). Conceptualizing left and right in comparative politics. Towards a deductive approach. Party Politics, 17, 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810380091 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, D. J., Cheung, F. & Donnellan, M. B. (2014). Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? A direct replication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000186 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Kleiman, T., Stern, C. & Trope, Y. (2016). When the spatial and ideological collide: Metaphorical conflict shapes social perception. Psychological Science, 27, 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615624029 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. GoslinEd., Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Laham, S. M., Alter, A. L. & Goodwin, G. P. (2009). Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer: Discrepant fluent violations are deemed less morally wrong. Cognition, 112, 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77, 453–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maass, A., Pagani, D. & Berta, E. (2007). How beautiful is the goal and how violent is the fistfight? Spatial bias in the interpretation of human behavior. Social Cognition, 25, 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.6.833 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nicholls, M. E. R., Loetscher, T. & Rademacher, M. (2010). Miss to the right: The effect of attentional asymmetries on goal-kicking. PLoS One, 5, e12363 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012363 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nicholls, M. E. R., Orr, C. A., Okubo, M. & Loftus, A. (2006). Satisfaction guaranteed: The effect of spatial biases on responses to Likert scales. Psychological Science, 17, 1027–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01822.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, D. M. & Trail, T. E. (2010). Why leaning to the left makes you lean to the left: Effects of spatial orientation on political attitudes. Social Cognition, 28, 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.5.651 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabaint, Trans.) New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1932). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Price, J. & Wolfers, J. (2014). Right-oriented bias: A comment on Roskes, Sligte, Shalvi, and De Dreu (2011). Psychological Science, 25, 2109–2111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614536738 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roskes, M., Sligte, D., Shalvi, S. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). The right side? Under time pressure, approach motivation leads to right-oriented bias. Psychological Science, 22, 1403–1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418677 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schnall, S., Benton, J. & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219–1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L. & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208317771 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233–250. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Suitner, C. & Giacomantonio, M. (2012). Seeing the forest from left to right: How construal level affects the spatial agency bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611414591 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wheatley, T. & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • White, J. (2011). Left and right as political resources. Journal of Political Ideologies, 16, 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2011.575681 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. MuschK. C. KlauerEds., The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar