Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Less Power, Greater Conflict

Low Power Increases the Experience of Conflict in Multiple Goal Settings

Published Online:February 07, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000327

Abstract

Abstract. Power facilitates goal pursuit, but how does power affect the way people respond to conflict between their multiple goals? Our results showed that higher trait power was associated with reduced experience of conflict in scenarios describing multiple goals (Study 1) and between personal goals (Study 2). Moreover, manipulated low power increased individuals’ experience of goal conflict relative to high power and a control condition (Studies 3 and 4), with the consequence that they planned to invest less into the pursuit of their goals in the future. With its focus on multiple goals and individuals’ experiences during goal pursuit rather than objective performance, the present research uses new angles to examine power effects on goal pursuit.

References

  • Abele, A. E. & Spurk, D. (2009). The longitudinal impact of self-efficacy and career goals on objective and subjective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.10.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, A. & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.324 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, C., John, O. P. & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Botvinick, M., Braver, T., Barch, D., Carter, C. & Cohen, J. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boudreaux, M. J. & Ozer, D. J. (2013). Goal conflict, goal striving, and psychological well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9333-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, J. S. (1948). Gradients of approach and avoidance responses and their relation to level of motivation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 41, 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055463 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cai, R. A. & Guinote, A. (2017). Doing many things at a time: Lack of power decreases the ability to multitask. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12190 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cinamon, R. G. (2006). Anticipated work-family conflict: Effects of gender, self-efficacy, and family background. The Career Development Quarterly, 54, 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00152.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Connor, K. M., Kobak, K. A., Churchill, L. E., Katzelnick, D. & Davidson, J. R. T. (2001). Mini-SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 14, 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.1055 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D. & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The accentuation bias: Money literally looms larger (and sometimes smaller) to the powerless. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610365170 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1058 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Emmons, R. A. & King, L. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: Immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1040 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N. & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02311.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fast, N. J., Sivanathan, N., Mayer, N. D. & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Power and overconfident decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Förster, J., Higgins, E. T. & Idson, L. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the “goal looms larger” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N. & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H. & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D. & Magee, J. C. (2015). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In J. SimpsonM. MikulincerP. R. ShaverEds., APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 421–460). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J. & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guinote, A. (2007a). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guinote, A. (2007b). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guinote, A. (2008). Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 237–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012518 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hershcovis, M. S., Neville, L., Reich, T. C., Christie, A. M., Cortina, L. M. & Shan, J. V. (2017). Witnessing wrongdoing: The effects of observer power on incivility intervention in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 142, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hirsh, J. B., Mar, R. A. & Peterson, J. B. (2012). Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119, 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026767 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hull, C. L. (1932). The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning. Psychological Review, 39, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0072640 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D. & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluation traits – self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kang, S. K., Galinsky, A. D., Kray, L. J. & Shirako, A. (2015). Power affects performance when the pressure is on: Evidence for low-power threat and high-power lift. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 726–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215577365 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H. & Anderson, A. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kleiman, T., Hassin, R. R. & Trope, Y. (2014). The control-freak mind: Stereotypical biases are eliminated following conflict-activated cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 498–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033047 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y. & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D. & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 776–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York, NY: Ronald Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Magee, J. C., Galinsky, A. D. & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2007). Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294413 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Magee, J. C. & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472732 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Myrseth, K. O. R. & Fishbach, A. (2009). Self-control: A function of knowing when and how to exercise restraint. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01645.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Riediger, M. & Freund, A. M. (2004). Interference and facilitation among personal goals: Differential associations with subjective well-being and persistent goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1511–1523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271184 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Riediger, M., Freund, A. M. & Baltes, P. B. (2005). Managing life through personal goals: Intergoal facilitation and intensity of goal pursuit in younger and older adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.2.P84 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scheepers, D., de Wit, F., Ellemers, N. & Sassenberg, K. (2012). Social power makes the heart work more efficiently: Evidence from cardiovascular markers of challenge and threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 371–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmid, P. C., Kleiman, T. & Amodio, D. M. (2015). Power effects on cognitive control: Turning conflict into action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000068 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmid, P. C. & Schmid Mast, M. (2013). Power increases performance in a social evaluation situation as a result of decreased stress responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1937 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmid, P. C., Schmid Mast, M. & Mast, F. W. (2015). Prioritizing – The task strategy of the powerful? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 2097–2105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1008525 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In S. W. J. WeinmanM. JohnstonEds., Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shah, J. Y., Friedman, R. & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1261–1280. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1261 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Slabu, L. & Guinote, A. (2010). Getting what you want: Power increases the accessibility of active goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, P. K. & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Social Cognition, 26, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, P. K., Jostmann, N. B., Galinsky, A. D. & van Dijk, W. W. (2008). Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 19, 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02107.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, P. K. & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F. & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weick, M. & Guinote, A. (2010). How long will it take? Power biases time predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar