Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Indirect Effects of Threat on the Contact–Prejudice Relationship

A Meta-Analysis

Published Online:February 27, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000364

Abstract

Abstract. This meta-analysis examines propositions derived from Intergroup Threat Theory (ITT; Stephan, Ybarra, & Morrison, 2009) regarding the role of symbolic and realistic threats on the relationship between contact and prejudice. Specifically, analyses examined whether threat has an indirect effect on the contact–prejudice relationship (aka mediation). Thirty-nine papers comprising 54 samples and over 25,000 participants provided 347 effects for analysis. Supporting ITT predictions, results clearly demonstrated the presence of an indirect effect. Tests of several moderators, including type of contact measure, type of threat, dimension of prejudice, and target of bias suggest that indirect effects are largely consistent across each domain of comparison. Findings are consistent with ITT’s propositions that contact influences threat and feelings of threat lead to prejudice.

References*Included in meta-analysis.**Qualified for meta-analysis but data unavailable for inclusion.

  • *Aberson, C. L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective prejudice. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18, 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214556699 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aberson, C. L. (2016a). Strange results and implausible correlations in Croucher (2013). Communication Monographs, 83, 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1119865 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aberson, C. L. (2016b). Rejoinder to Croucher. Communication Monographs, 83, 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1119869 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Aberson, C. L. & Gaffney, A. M. (2009). An integrated threat model of implicit and explicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.582 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aberson, C. L. & Haag, S.C. (2007). Contact, anxiety, perspective taking, and stereotype endorsement as predictors of implicit and explicit biases. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207074726 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Abrams, D., Van de Vyver, J., Houston, D. M. & Vasiljevic, M. (2017). Does terror defeat contact? Intergroup contact and prejudice toward Muslims before and after the London bombings. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000167 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Al Ramiah, A., Hewstone, M., Little, T. D. & Lang, K. (2014). The influence of status on the relationship between intergroup contact, threat, and prejudice in the context of a nation-building intervention in Malaysia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58, 1202–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002713492634 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berrenberg, J. L., Finlay, K. A., Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (2002). Prejudice toward people with cancer or AIDS: Applying the integrated threat model. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 7, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2002.tb00078.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P. & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018933 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Çakal, H., Hewstone, M., Güler, M. & Heath, A. (2016). Predicting support for collective action in the conflict between Turks and Kurds: Perceived threats as a mediator of intergroup contact and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 732–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216641303 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, M. W. (2015). metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Clifton, J. & Aberson, C. L. (2011, April). The role of threat in attitudes toward same sex marriage. Poster presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clifton, J. & Aberson, C. L. (2012). Measuring threat as it relates to social policy: Psychometric considerations. In B. O HunterT. J. RomeroEds., Psychology of threat (pp. 111–140). Hauppauge NY: Nova. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Corenblum, B. & Stephan, W. G. (2001). White fears and native apprehensions: An integrated threat theory approach to intergroup relations. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087147 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Croucher, S. M. (2016). Further development of integrated threat theory and intergroup contact: A reply to Aberson (2015). Communication Monographs, 83, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1119866 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Croucher, S. M. (2013). Integrated threat theory and acceptance of immigrant assimilation: An analysis of Muslim immigration in Western Europe. Communication Monographs, 80, 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.739704 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Croucher, S. M., Aalto, J., Hirvonen, S. & Sommier, M. (2013). Integrated threat and intergroup contact: An analysis of Muslim immigration to Finland. Human Communication, 16, 109–120. Retrieved from https://www.uab.edu/Communicationstudies/humancommunication/02_06_13_Croucher.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Croucher, S. M., Galy-Badenas, F. & Ruotsalainen, M. (2014). Host culture acceptance, religiosity, and the threat of Muslim immigration. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 35, 3. Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr35/croucher.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Croucher, S. M., Homsey, D., Brusch, E., Buyce, C., DeSilva, S. & Thompson, A. (2013). Prejudice toward American Muslims. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 32. Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr32/croucher.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Croucher, S. M., Juntunen, S. & Cheng, Z. (2014). Muslim immigration to India: The influence of religiosity on the perception of immigrant threat. Journal of Communication & Religion, 37, 79–92. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Curşeu, P. L., Stoop, R. & Schalk, R. (2007). Prejudice toward immigrant workers among Dutch employees: Integrated threat theory revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.331 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davies, K., Tropp, L. R., Aron, A., Pettigrew, T. F. & Wright, S. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411103 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. D. & Stephan, W. G. (2011). Electromyographic analyses of responses to intergroup threat. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00709.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **Debrosse, R., Cooper, M. E., Taylor, D. M., de la Sablonnière, R & Crush, J. (2016). Fundamental rights in the rainbow nation: Intergroup contact, threat, and support for newcomers’ rights in post-apartheid South Africa. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22, 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000186 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., Tredoux, C. G., Tropp, L. R., Clack, B., Eaton, L. & Quayle, M. (2010). Challenging the stubborn core of opposition to equality: Racial contact and policy attitudes. Political Psychology, 31, 831–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00792.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fisher, Z. & Tipton, E. (2015). robumeta: Robust variance meta-regression. R package version 1.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=robumeta First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Freitag, M. & Rapp, C. (2013). Intolerance toward immigrants in Switzerland: Diminished threat through social contacts. Swiss Political Science Review, 19, 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12049 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fritz, M. S. & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **Fujioka, Y. (2011). Perceived threats and Latino immigrant attitudes: How White and African American college students respond to news coverage of Latino immigrants. Howard Journal of Communications, 22, 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2011.546743 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gleser, L. J. & Olkin, I. (2009). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. CooperL.V. HedgesJ. C. ValentineEds., The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 357–376). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *González, K. V., Verkuyten, M., Weesie, J. & Poppe, E. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X284443 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *González, R., Sirlopú, D. & Kessler, T. (2010). Prejudice among Peruvians and Chileans as a function of identity, intergroup contact, acculturation preferences, and intergroup emotions. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 803–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01676.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Haji-Ghasemi, A. (2014). Predictors of Islamophobia among non-Muslim Americans, (Order No. AAI3578684). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.humboldt.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1629381607?accountid=11532 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E. & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Hermannsdóttir, B. S., Ægisdóttir, S. & Gerstein, L. H. (2012). Multicultural psychology in Iceland: Meeting the needs of a changing society. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 1, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028720 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Hindriks, P., Verkuyten, M. & Coenders, M. (2015). The evaluation of immigrants’ political acculturation strategies. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 47, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.04.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Hutchison, P., Chihade, R. & Puiu, A. A. (2018). Predictors of “the last acceptable racism”: Group threats and public attitudes toward gypsies and travellers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12508 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **Ionescu, M. (2011). Correlates of anti-immigrant prejudice in 1990s Spain (Order No. AAI3424437). Available from PsycINFO. (869836853; 2011-99070-142) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kanas, A., Scheepers, P. & Sterkens, C. (2015). Interreligious contact, perceived group threat, and perceived discrimination: Predicting negative attitudes among religious minorities and majorities in Indonesia. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 102–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514564790 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **Kanas, A., Scheepers, P. & Sterkens, C. (2017). Positive and negative contact and attitudes towards the religious out-group: Testing the contact hypothesis in conflict and non-conflict regions of Indonesia and the Philippines. Social Science Research, 63, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.019 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Katz, I. & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Khan, Z. & Bruschke, J. (2016). Media coverage of Muslims, perceived threats, ethnocentrism, and intercultural contact: Applying Cultivation Theory, Integrated Threat Theory, and the Contact Hypothesis. Northwest Journal of Communication, 44, 7–34. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Mähönen, T. A. & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2016). Ramifications of positive and negative contact experiences among remigrants from Russia to Finland. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000059 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **Madeira, A. F., Pereira, C. R., Gama, A. & Dias, S. (2018). Justifying treatment bias: The legitimizing role of threat perception and immigrant–provider contact in healthcare. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24, 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000187 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Mancini, T., Caricati, L. & Marletta, G. (2018). Does contact at work extend its influence beyond prejudice? Evidence from healthcare settings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1319792 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McShane, B. B., Böckenholt, U. & Hansen, K. T. (2016). Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis: An evaluation of selection methods and some cautionary notes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 730–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616662243 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Meeusen, C., Barlow, F. K. & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Generalized and specific components of prejudice: The decomposition of intergroup context effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2252 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Nshom, E. (2016). Predictors of Finnish adolescent’s prejudice towards Russian immigrants and the effect of intergroup contact. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2015.1136347 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Outten, H. R., Schmitt, M. T., Miller, D. A. & Garcia, A. L. (2012). Feeling threatened about the future: Whites’ emotional reactions to anticipated ethnic demographic changes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211418531 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Future directions for Intergroup Contact Theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.12.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Ridge, R. D. & Montoya, J. A. (2013). Favorable contact during volunteer service: Reducing prejudice toward Mexicans in the American southwest. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2144 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W. & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and the integrated threat theory: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Rohmann, A., Florack, A. & Piontkowski, U. (2006). The role of discordant acculturation attitudes in perceived threat: An analysis of host and immigrant attitudes in Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Ryan, D., Whitham, H. M. & Aberson, C. L. (2015, April). Threats mediate the relationship between contact and same-sex marriage attitudes. Poster presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Las Vegas, NV First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Schmid, K., Ramiah, A. A. & Hewstone, M. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508956 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Schmid, K., Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Hughes, J. & Cairns, E. (2008). The effects of living in segregated vs. mixed areas in Northern Ireland: A simultaneous analysis of contact and threat effects in the context of micro-level neighborhoods. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2, 56–71. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/ijcv.27 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schlueter, E., Schmidt, P. & Wagner, U. (2008). Disentangling the causal relations of perceived group threat and outgroup derogation: Cross-national evidence from German and Russian panel surveys. European Sociological Review, 24, 567–581. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **Shin, H., Leal, D. L. & Ellison, C. G. (2015). Sources of support for immigration restriction: Economics, politics, or anti-Latino bias? Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 37, 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986315604424 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D. & Simmons, J. P. (2014). p-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stanley, T. D. & Doucouliagos, H. (2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Stephan, C. W., Stephan, W. G., Demitrakis, K. M., Yamada, A. M. & Clason, D. L. (2000). Women’s attitudes toward men: An integrated threat theory approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01022.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., McNatt, P. S. & Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in racial attitudes of blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **Stephan, W. G., Diaz-Loving, R. & Duran, A. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031002006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G., Renfro, C. L., Esses, V. M., Stephan, C. W. & Martin, T. (2005). The effects of Feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (1993). Cognition and affect in stereotyping: Parallel interactive networks. In D. M. MackieD. L. HamiltonEds., Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 111–136). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O. & Morrison, K. R. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. In T. NelsonEd., Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 43–60). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tanner-Smith, E. E. & Tipton, E. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1091 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., Cairns, E. & Christ, O. (2007). Cross-community contact, perceived status differences, and intergroup attitudes in Northern Ireland: The mediating roles of individual-level versus group-level threats and the moderating role of social identification. Political Psychology, 28, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00551.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Tausch, N., Hewstone, M. & Roy, R. (2009). The relationships between contact, status and prejudice: An integrated threat theory analysis of Hindu-Muslim relations in India. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.984 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Tausch, N., Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. & Cairns, E. (2007). Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: The moderating role of social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X155150 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tropp, L. R. & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Differential relationships between intergroup: Contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205274854 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Van Assche, J., Asbrock, F. & Dhont, K. (2018). The diversity challenge for low and high authoritarians. Multilevel and longitudinal effects through intergroup contact and threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1163–1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218764653 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **van der Noll, J., Poppe, E. & Verkuyten, M. (2010). Political tolerance and prejudice: Differential reactions toward Muslims in the Netherlands. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903540067 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **Ward, C. & Berno, T. (2011). Beyond social exchange theory: Attitudes toward tourists. Annals of Tourism Research, 38, 1556–1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.02.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • **Ward, C. & Masgoret, A. (2006). An integrative model of attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *White, C., Duck, J. M. & Newcombe, P. A. (2012). The impact of media reliance on the role of perceived threat in predicting tolerance of Muslim cultural practice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 3051–3082. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00973.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar