Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Commentary

Social and Personal Power: A Closer Examination

An Invited Commentary to Mayiwar and Lai (2019)

Published Online:August 14, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000389

Abstract

Abstract. We thank Mayiwar and Lai (2019) for conducting a replication of Study 1 in Lammers, Stoker, and Stapel (2009) but disagree with their conclusions. Instead, we conclude that their results largely support ours. The results replicate the theoretical distinction between social and personal power, replicate that recalling social versus personal power produces dissimilar levels of stereotyping, and replicate that they produce similar levels of behavioral approach orientation. We discuss the weaker results on stereotyping as the result of the use of an unreliable measure and conclude that despite this, the data are consistent with the possibility of medium-sized effects. We discuss the null-effects on behavioral approach (compared to control) as the result of a change in instructions. We end with a discussion on the implications for the social–personal power distinction and the power literature in general, with a particular focus on how future replication efforts may provide even greater insight.

References

  • Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.324 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, S. F., & Maxwell, S. E. (2016). There’s more than one way to conduct a replication study: Beyond statistical significance. Psychological Methods, 21, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boksem, M. A. S., Smolders, R., & Cremer, D. D. (2012). Social power and approach-related neural activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 516–520. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cesario, J. (2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613513470 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chance, M. R. A. (1967). Attention structure as the basis of primate rank order. Man, 2, 503–518. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Connolly, W. E. (1993). The terms of political discourse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fast, N. J., & Chen, S. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate: Power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological Science, 20, 1406–1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02452.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., & Berdahl, J. (2007). Social power. In A. W. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 678–692). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). Waterloo, Canada: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Magee, J. C. (2015). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In M. MikulincerP. R. ShaverJ. A. SimpsonJ. F. DovidioEds., APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 421–460). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-016 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guinote, A. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hirsh, J. B., Galinsky, A. D., & Zhong, C. B. (2011). Drunk, powerful, and in the dark: How general processes of disinhibition produce both prosocial and antisocial behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611416992 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huang, L., Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior. Psychological Science, 22, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610391912 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jordan, J., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Something to lose and nothing to gain. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 530–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212441928 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Joshi, P. D., & Fast, N. J. (2013). Power and reduced temporal discounting. Psychological Science, 24, 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457950 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). Ease of retrieval moderates the effects of power: Implications for the replicability of power recall effects. Social Cognition, 35, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19, 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02123.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543–1548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02479.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2010). Power and behavioral approach orientation in existing power relations and the mediating effect of income. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.702 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206297405 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean. American Psychologist, 70, 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mayiwar, L., & Lai, L. (2019). Replication of study 1 in “Differentiating Social and Personal Power” by Lammers, Stoker, and Stapel, 2009. Social Psychology, 50, 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000388 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar

  • Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.431 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ranehill, E., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Leiberg, S., Sul, S., & Weber, R. A. (2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effect on hormones and risk tolerance in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26, 653–656. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shepherd, S. V., Deaner, R. O., & Platt, M. L. (2006). Social status gates social attention in monkeys. Current Biology, 16, R119–R120. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, P. K., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Social Cognition, 26, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trafimow, D. (2016). The attenuation of correlation coefficients: A statistical literacy issue. Teaching Statistics, 38, 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12087 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.351 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology. (G. Roth, & C. Wittich, Eds. and Trans.). Original entitled: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Published 1914. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, M., & Smith, P. K. (2018). Does power reduce temporal discounting? Commentary on Joshi and Fast (2013). Psychological Science, 29, 1010–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617754219 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar