We Only Believe in News That We Doctored Ourselves

References

• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos (Version 22.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago, IL: SPSS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Barlai, M., & Sik, E. (2017). A Hungarian trademark (a “Hungarikum”): The moral panic button. In M. BarlaiB. FähnrichC. GriesslerM. RhombergEds., The migrant crisis: European perspectives and national discourses (pp. 147–169). Münster, Germany: LIT Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Bennett, S. E., Rhine, S. L., Flickinger, R. S., & Bennett, L. L. (1999). “Video malaise” revisited: Public trust in the media and government. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X9900400402 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K., & Muntele, D. (2007). Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 19–32. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Chang, E. P., & Pillai, R. (2014). The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Enyedi, Z. (2016). Paternalist populism and illiberal elitism in Central Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 21, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1105402 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Eurobarometer Data Service. (2016). The economic and financial situation compared to last year. Retrieved from http://www.gesis.org/eurobarometer-data-service/search-data-access/eb-trends-trend-files/list-of-trends/changes-last/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Fessler, D. M., Pisor, A. C., & Holbrook, C. (2017). Political orientation predicts credulity regarding putative hazards. Psychological Science, 28, 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617692108 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Gabielkov, M., Ramachandran, A., Chaintreau, A., & Legout, A. (2016). Social clicks: What and who gets read on Twitter? ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 44, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/2896377.2901462 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Greer, J. D. (2003). Evaluating the credibility of online information: A test of source and advertising influence. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0601_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Hayes, T., Lee, J. C., & Wood, W. (2018). Ideological group influence: central role of message meaning. Social Influence, 13, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2017.1402818 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Housholder, E. E., & LaMarre, H. L. (2014). Facebook politics: Toward a process model for achieving political source credibility through social media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11, 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.951753 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-) truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38, 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Juhász, A., & Szicherle, P. (2017). The political effects of migration-related fake news, disinformation and conspiracy theories in Europe. Retrieved from http://politicalcapital.hu/pc-admin/source/documents/FES_PC_FakeNewsMigrationStudy_EN_20170524.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2182588 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Keeley, B. L. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96, 109–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564659 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Knapp, R. H. (1944). A psychology of rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly, 8, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/265665 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Krekó, P. (2015). Conspiracy theory as collective motivated cognition. In M. BilewiczA. CichockaW. SoralEds., The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 60–67). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. HigginsA. W. KruglanskiEds., Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–520). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Kugler, M., Jost, J. T., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27, 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., … Schudson, M. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359, 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Lazer, D., Baum, M., Grinberg, N., Friedland, L., Joseph, K., Hobbs, W., & Mattsson, C. (2017). Combating fake news: An agenda for research and action. Retrieved from https://shorensteincenter.org/combating-fake-news-agenda-for-research/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G., Freund, A. M., Oberauer, K., & Krueger, J. I. (2013). Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: From Iraq and the “War on Terror” to future threats to peace. American Psychologist, 68, 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034515 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Lippmann, W. (1933). A new social order. New York, NY: John Day. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Little, A. T. (2017). Propaganda and credulity. Games and Economic Behavior, 102, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.12.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Macho, S., & Ledermann, T. (2011). Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: the phantom model approach. Psychological Methods, 16, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021763 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60, 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., & Tompson, T. (2015). What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-Black attitudes. Electoral Studies, 40, 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2017). Who falls for fake news? The roles of analytic thinking, motivated reasoning, political ideology, and bullshit receptivity. Retrieved November 16, 2017, from SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=3023545 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Pew Research Center. (2017). Globally, people point to ISIS and climate change as leading security threats. Retrieved from http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/08/01/globally-people-point-to-isis-and-climate-change-as-leading-security-threats/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Pivarnyik, B. (2017). Poll: Most voters do not believe in the existence of a “Soros plan”. Retrieved from https://budapestbeacon.com/poll-voters-not-believe-existence-soros-plan/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350–353. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Shnabel, N., Bar-Anan, Y., Kende, A., Bareket, O., & Lazar, Y. (2016). Help to perpetuate traditional gender roles: Benevolent sexism increases engagement in dependency-oriented cross-gender helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 55–75. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Silverman, C., & Singer-Vine, J. (2016). Most Americans who see fake news believe it, new survey says. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/fake-news-survey?utm_term=.ynOoWD3XPp#.ng0rg2R68Z First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Swire, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160802 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Treisman, D. (2011). Presidential popularity in a hybrid regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00500.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Washburn, A. N., & Skitka, L. J. (2017). Science denial across the political divide: Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to deny attitude-inconsistent science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 972–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731500 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65, 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12164 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar