Abstract
Abstract. We investigated processing speed for deservingness-relevant versus deservingness-irrelevant information. Female students read stories involving deserved, undeserved, or neutral outcomes. We recorded participants’ reaction time (RT) in processing the outcomes. We also measured individual differences in “belief in a just world” as a proxy for deservingness schematicity. RTs for deserved and undeserved outcomes were faster than for neutral outcomes, B = −8.45, p = .011, an effect that increased the stronger the belief in a just world (e.g., B = −3.18, p = .006). These findings provide novel evidence that the construct of deservingness is central in human social relations, and suggest both universal and particularistic schemas for deservingness.
References
1996). Body image: A cognitive self-schema construct? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228033
(2011). Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice-related information. European Journal of Personality, 25, 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.800
(1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.369
(2013). Eye movements to audiovisual scenes reveal expectations of a just world. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028261
(2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.013
(2010). When deserving translates into causing: The effect of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1097–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.024
(2008). On justifying punishment: The discrepancy between words and actions. Social Justice Research, 21, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0068-x
(2009). Morality in the law: The psychological foundations of citizens’ desires to punish transgressions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172335
(2016). The role of perceived deservingness in the toleration of human rights violations. Social Justice Research, 29, 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-016-0273-y
(2013).
(Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative theory of personality . In H. TennenJ. SulsEds., Handbook of psychology, Vol. 5: Personality and social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 93–118). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
(1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
(2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 38–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600662321
(2010). Compensatory rationalizations and the resolution of everyday undeserved outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351701
(2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611004
(2002).
(Why we reject innocent victims . In M. RossD. T. MillerEds., The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 109–126). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.2011).
(The psychology of deservingness and acceptance of human rights . In E. KalsJ. MaesEds., Justice and conflicts: Theoretical and empirical contributions (pp. 407–428). New York, NY: Springer.2018). The effectiveness of deservingness-based advertising messages: The role of product knowledge and belief in a just world. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 35, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/CJAS.1406
(2016).
(Belief in a just world . In C. SabbaghM. SchmittEds., Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 145–160). New York, NY: Springer.2013).
(The emergence of social cognition . In D. E. CarlstonEd., The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 16–32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.00021989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7, 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.113
(2005). Development of the comprehension and appreciation of fables. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.1.5-37
(2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
(1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x
(1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90081-L
(1974). Deserving, the “personal contract”, and altruistic behavior by children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036207
(1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63
(1987). Thinking fat: Self-schemas for body weight and the processing of weight relevant information. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00292.x
(1979). Children’s reactions to the perpetrators and victims of injustices. Child Development, 50, 861–868. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128955
(2015). Implicit deservingness: Implicit association test for belief in a just world. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 49, 203–212.
(2012). To each according to his need? Variability in the responses to inequity in non-human primates. Social Justice Research, 25, 140–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0153-z
(2007). The origins of shared intuitions of justice. Vanderbilt Law Review, 60, 1633–1688.
(2007). Developmental sources of implicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1700–1713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207307487
(1986). Stalking the elusive schema: Insights from developmental and social-psychological analyses of gender schemas. Social Cognition, 4, 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1986.4.2.227
(2010). The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factor validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23, 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2
(2012). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
(1976).
(New directions in equity research . In L. BerkowitzE. WalsterEds., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 1–42). New York, NY: Academic Press.