Skip to main content
Research Report

Evidence of a Processing Advantage for Deservingness-Relevant Information

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000396

Abstract. We investigated processing speed for deservingness-relevant versus deservingness-irrelevant information. Female students read stories involving deserved, undeserved, or neutral outcomes. We recorded participants’ reaction time (RT) in processing the outcomes. We also measured individual differences in “belief in a just world” as a proxy for deservingness schematicity. RTs for deserved and undeserved outcomes were faster than for neutral outcomes, B = −8.45, p = .011, an effect that increased the stronger the belief in a just world (e.g., B = −3.18, p = .006). These findings provide novel evidence that the construct of deservingness is central in human social relations, and suggest both universal and particularistic schemas for deservingness.

References

  • Altabe, M., & Thompson, J. K. (1996). Body image: A cognitive self-schema construct? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228033 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., Staubach, M., & Schmitt, M. (2011). Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice-related information. European Journal of Personality, 25, 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.800 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.369 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Callan, M. J., Ferguson, H. J., & Bindemann, M. (2013). Eye movements to audiovisual scenes reveal expectations of a just world. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028261 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Davidenko, N., & Ellard, J. H. (2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Callan, M. J., Sutton, R. M., & Dovale, C. (2010). When deserving translates into causing: The effect of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1097–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carlsmith, K. M. (2008). On justifying punishment: The discrepancy between words and actions. Social Justice Research, 21, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0068-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Darley, J. M. (2009). Morality in the law: The psychological foundations of citizens’ desires to punish transgressions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172335 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drolet, C. E., Hafer, C. L., & Heuer, L. (2016). The role of perceived deservingness in the toleration of human rights violations. Social Justice Research, 29, 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-016-0273-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Epstein, S. (2013). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative theory of personality. In H. TennenJ. SulsEds., Handbook of psychology, Vol. 5: Personality and social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 93–118). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Feather, N. T. (2006). Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 38–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600662321 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gaucher, D., Hafer, C. L., Kay, A. C., & Davidenko, N. (2010). Compensatory rationalizations and the resolution of everyday undeserved outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351701 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hafer, C. L. (2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hafer, C. L. (2002). Why we reject innocent victims. In M. RossD. T. MillerEds., The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 109–126). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hafer, C. L. (2011). The psychology of deservingness and acceptance of human rights. In E. KalsJ. MaesEds., Justice and conflicts: Theoretical and empirical contributions (pp. 407–428). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hafer, C. L., Mantonakis, A., Fitzgerald, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (2018). The effectiveness of deservingness-based advertising messages: The role of product knowledge and belief in a just world. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 35, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/CJAS.1406 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hafer, C. L., & Sutton, R. (2016). Belief in a just world. In C. SabbaghM. SchmittEds., Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 145–160). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, D. L., & Carlston, D. E. (2013). The emergence of social cognition. In D. E. CarlstonEd., The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 16–32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0002 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7, 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.113 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jose, P. E., D’Anna, C. A., & Krieg, D. B. (2005). Development of the comprehension and appreciation of fables. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.1.5-37 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90081-L First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Long, G. T., & Lerner, M. J. (1974). Deserving, the “personal contract”, and altruistic behavior by children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036207 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Markus, H., Hamill, R., & Sentis, K. P. (1987). Thinking fat: Self-schemas for body weight and the processing of weight relevant information. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00292.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D. T., & McCann, C. D. (1979). Children’s reactions to the perpetrators and victims of injustices. Child Development, 50, 861–868. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128955 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Modesto, J. G., & Pilati, R. (2015). Implicit deservingness: Implicit association test for belief in a just world. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 49, 203–212. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Price, S. A., & Brosnan, S. F. (2012). To each according to his need? Variability in the responses to inequity in non-human primates. Social Justice Research, 25, 140–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0153-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, P. H., Kurzban, R., & Jones, O. (2007). The origins of shared intuitions of justice. Vanderbilt Law Review, 60, 1633–1688. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A., Phelan, J. E., & Heppen, J. B. (2007). Developmental sources of implicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1700–1713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207307487 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruble, D. N., & Stangor, C. (1986). Stalking the elusive schema: Insights from developmental and social-psychological analyses of gender schemas. Social Cognition, 4, 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1986.4.2.227 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factor validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23, 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2012). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1976). New directions in equity research. In L. BerkowitzE. WalsterEds., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 1–42). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar