“‘Cause We Are the Champions of the World”
National Narcissism and Group-Enhancing Historical Narratives
Abstract
Abstract. National narcissism is a defensive form of group identity that is contingent on external validation and involves unrealistic belief in the nation’s greatness. Those high in national narcissism are susceptible to ingroup-enhancing narratives. In two pre-registered studies, conducted in Poland (N = 1,134) and the United Kingdom (N = 501), we hypothesized and found that national narcissism predicts support for historical policies that emphasize the great achievements and past dominance of one’s own group. Furthermore, we found that the relationship between national narcissism and support for ingroup-enhancing historical policies can be accounted for by the perceived contribution of one’s own country to the world’s history. We discuss implications for research on collective narcissism and historical policies.
References
1963). Critical models: Interventions and catchwords. Columbia University Press.
(2021). Stand out of my sunlight: The mediating role of climate change conspiracy beliefs in the relationship between national collective narcissism and acceptance of climate science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 738–758. 10.1177/1368430221992114
(2022). Their own worst enemy? Collective narcissists are willing to conspire against their in-group. British Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 896–916. 10.1111/bjop.12569
(2018). Marzec w lutym? Studium stosunku Polaków do Żydów i historii Holokaustu w kontekście debaty wokół ustawy o IPN [March in February? A study of Poles’ attitudes towards Jews and the history of the Holocaust in the context of the debate surrounding the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance]. Nauka, 2, 7–41.
(2021). Moral tribalism: Moral judgments of actions supporting ingroup interests depend on collective narcissism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, Article 104098. 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104098
(2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3(3), 239–262. 10.1080/13576500444000047
(2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 283–317. 10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530
(2020). Nationalism as collective narcissism. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 69–74. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.12.013
(2021). Can ingroup love harm the ingroup? Collective narcissism and objectification of ingroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(7), 1718–1738. 10.1177/13684302211038058
(2017). On self-love and outgroup hate: Opposite effects of narcissism on prejudice via social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Narcissism, ideology, and prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 31(4), 366–384. 10.1002/per.2114
(2018). Personal control decreases narcissistic but increases non-narcissistic in-group positivity. Journal of Personality, 86(3), 465–480. 10.1111/jopy.12328
(2016). ‘They will not control us’: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 556–576. 10.1111/bjop.12158
(2022). Globalization is associated with lower levels of national narcissism: Evidence from 56 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. 10.1177/19485506221103326
(2021). Words not deeds: National narcissism, national identification, and support for greenwashing versus genuine proenvironmental campaigns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, Article 101576. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101576
(2021). National narcissism and support for voluntary vaccination policy: The mediating role of vaccination conspiracy beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 701–719. 10.1177/1368430220959451
(2020). Brexit and Polexit: Collective narcissism is associated with support for leaving the European Union. Social Psychological Bulletin, 15(1), 1–21. 10.32872/spb.2645
(2018). Cutting the forest down to save your face: Narcissistic national identification predicts support for anti-conservation policies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 65–73. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.009
(2009). How modernity forgets? Cambridge University Press.
(1989). How societies remember (Themes in the social sciences). Cambridge University Press.
(2019). Collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction predict different reactions to the past transgressions of the in-group. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 50(4), 316–325. 10.24425/ppb.2019.131004
(2022). Investigating motivations underlying collective narcissism and in-group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. 10.1177/13684302221081470
(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
(2018). Collective narcissism and the 2016 US presidential vote. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 110–121. 10.1093/poq/nfx048
(2019). Understanding populism: Collective narcissism and the collapse of democracy in Hungary. In J. P. ForgasK. FiedlerW. Crano (Eds.), Applications of social psychology (pp. 267–291). Psychology Press.
(1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
(2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
(2020). jAMM: jamovi Advanced Mediation Models [jamovi module]. https://jamovi-amm.github.io/
(1981). Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgments and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(5), 797–808. 10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.797
(2022). “Cause we are the champions of the World”: National narcissism and group-enhancing historical narratives. https://osf.io/nqymg
(2013). The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 16–28. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x
(2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096. 10.1037/a0016904
(2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1019–1039. 10.1037/a0032215
(2020). Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 741–764. d10.1037/pspp0000260
(2017). The relationship between the Brexit Vote and individual predictors of prejudice: Collective narcissism, right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2023. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02023
(2022). A vicious circle? Longitudinal relationships between different modes of in-group identity and COVID-19 conspiracy thinking. The Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1080/00224545.2022.2111250
(2022). Illiberal politics and group-based needs for recognition and dominance. In A. SajóS. HolmesR. Uitz (Eds.), Routledge handbook of illiberalism (pp. 655–673). Routledge.
(2022). A small price to pay: National narcissism predicts readiness to sacrifice in-group members to defend the in-group’s image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. 10.1177/01461672221074790
(1980). The collective memory. Harper & Row.
(2016). Czym jest dojrzała identyfikacja z grupą? W poszukiwaniu komponentów identyfikacji grupowej mających pozytywne konsekwencje dla grupy własnej i relacji międzygrupowych [What is secure in-group identification? Looking for in-group identification components that lead to in-group’s benefit and positive inter-group relations]. [Doctoral dissertation]. https://depotuw.ceon.pl/handle/item/1648
(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
(2012). Thinking the twentieth century. Penguin Press.
(2022). Too great to be guilty? Individuals high in collective narcissism demand closure regarding the past to attenuate collective guilt. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 748–771. 10.1002/ejsp.2850
(2017). From socially motivated lay historians to lay censors: Epistemic conformity and defensive group identification. Memory Studies, 10(3), 334–346. 10.1177/1750698017701616
(2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
(2005). Social representations of events and people in world history across 12 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(2), 171–191. 10.1177/0022022104272900
(1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge University Press.
(2022). Who respects the will of the people? Support for democracy is linked to high secure national identity but low national narcissism. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(2), 599–621. 10.1111/bjso.12499
(2020). Superficial in-group love? Collective narcissism predicts in-group image defense, outgroup prejudice and lower in-group loyalty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(4), 857–875. 10.1111/bjso.12367
(2018). Populism as identity politics: Perceived in-group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 151–162. 10.1177/1948550617732393
(1977). We are the champions [Song recorded by Queen]. News of the World. EMI/Parlophone.
(1989). Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24. 10.2307/2928520.
(J., PennebakerD., PaezB., Rim (Eds.) (1997). Collective memory of political events: Social psychological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2018). Collective narcissism: Americans exaggerate the role of their home state in appraising U.S. History. Psychological Science, 29(9), 1414–1422. 10.1177/0956797618772504
(2008). Making a past fit for the future: The political and ontological dimensions of historical continuity. In F. Sani (Ed.), Self continuity: Individual and collective perspectives (pp. 145–158). Psychology Press.
(2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 698–711. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
(1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 322–336. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.322
(2018). How fascism works: The politics of Us and Them. Random House.
(2021). National Narcissism predicts the belief in and the dissemination of conspiracy theories during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from 56 countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. 10.1177/01461672211054947
(2021). March 20). Łuk triumfalny w Tomaszowie. Sasin: Będzie przyczyniał się do tego, że nie roztopimy się w magmie europejskiej [Triumphal Arch in Tomaszów. Sasin: It will help us not to melt into European magma]. https://www.tokfm.pl/Tokfm/7,103087,26903432,luk-triumfalny-w-tomaszowie-sasin-bedzie-przyczynial-sie-do.html
(1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
(2022). Right-wing political orientation, national identification and the acceptance of immigrants and minorities. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, Article 111217. 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111217
(1997). Narrative tools of history and identity. Culture & Psychology, 3(1), 5–20. 10.1177/1354067X9700300101
(2014, April 18). Lepiej żyć w kraju, który nie potrzebuje bohaterów [Better to live in a country that doesn’t need heroes]. Wyborcza.pl. https://wyborcza.pl/magazyn/7,124059,15826445,lepiej-zyc-w-kraju-ktory-nie-potrzebuje-bohaterow.html
(in press). Between discovery and exploitation of history: Lay theories of history and their connections to national identity and interest in history. Memory Studies. 10.1177/17506980221134507
(2018). We made history: Citizens of 35 countries overestimate their nation’s role in world history. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(4), 521–528. 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.05.006
(