Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000667

In the article entitled “The Pathological Narcissism Inventory: Measurement invariance across Serbian and USA samples and further validation” by Bojana M. Dinić and Aleksandar Vujić (European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(4), 670–680, https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000537), the Table 2 Notes on p. 673 contain some mistakes.

The correct Table Notes read as follows:

Notes. M1 = Seven-factor model. M2 = Hierarchical model from Wright et al. (2010) with NG = EXP + GF + ER and NV = CSE + SSSE + HS + DEV; M3 = Alternative hierarchical model from Wright et al. (2010) with NG = EXP + SSSE + GF and NV = CSE + HS + DEV + ER; M4 = The hierarchical model from Pincus et al. (2009) with NG = EXP + ER + GF + SSSE and NV = CSE + HS + DEV; CFI = Comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA = Root mean square error of approximation; CI = Confidence interval; SRMR = Standardized root mean square residual; AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion.

The authors regret any inconvenience or confusion this error might have caused.

References

  • Dinić, B. M., & Vujić, A. (2020). The Pathological Narcissism Inventory: Measurement invariance across Serbian and USA samples and further validation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(4), 670–680. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000537 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar