Emotion Regulation Flexibility
Challenges and Promise of Using Ecological Momentary Assessment
References
2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4
(2019). Mix it to fix it: Emotion regulation variability in daily life. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000566
(2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116
(2004). The importance of being flexible: The ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment. Psychological Science, 15, 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00705.x
(2013). The regulation of negative and positive affect in daily life. Emotion, 13, 926–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032400
(2017). A snapshot of the life as lived: Wearable cameras in social and personality psychological science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 592–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617703170
(2017). An experience sampling approach to emotion regulation: Situational suppression use and social hierarchy. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.004
(2001). Accessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: A multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 814–833. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.814
(2019). Complex affect dynamics add limited information to the prediction of psychological well-being. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0555-0
(2018). Another year older, another year wiser? Emotion regulation strategy selection and flexibility across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 33, 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000251
(2019). Regulating for a reason: Emotion regulation goals are linked to spontaneous strategy use. Journal of Personality, 87, 948–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12447
(2017). Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9597-z
(2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026
(2018). Context is everything (in emotion research). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12, e12393. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12393
(1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.224
(2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
(2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
(2016). The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being. Psychological Science, 27, 1651–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616669086
(2019). A comparison of signal- and event-contingent ambulatory assessment of interpersonal behavior and affect in social situation. Psychological Assessment, 31, 952–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000718
(2017). Emotion dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.004
(2001). The electronically activated recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 33, 517–523. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195410
(2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017915
(2015). Ultra-brief measures for the situational eight DIAMONDS domains. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000245
(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
(2014). Emotion regulation choice: A conceptual framework and supporting evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030831
(2018). Flexible, yet firm: A model of healthy emotion regulation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37, 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2018.37.4.231
(2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315586325
(2017). New frontiers in ambulatory assessment: Big data methods for capturing couples’ emotions, vocalizations, and physiology in daily life. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709115
(2010). A graphical vector autoregressive modelling approach to the analysis of electronic diary data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-28
(