Are There Gender Differences in Computer Performance? If So, Can Motivation Explain Them?
Abstract
Abstract. Building on previous research which suggests that females are at a disadvantage when working with computers, the current paper investigates possible explanations. We used the cognitive-motivational process model (Vollmeyer & Rheinberg, 1999, 2000) to explore if motivation can account for the performance differences between male and female students. The model assumes that initial motivation affects strategies and motivation during learning which then influence performance. Male and female students from an introductory statistics class (N = 40), had to solve four statistics tasks with SPSS in 30 minutes. Measurements included initial motivation, functional state (i.e., flow) during task performance, navigation style, and task performance. Results show that males outperform females in terms of time needed for task completion and performance level. Male students displayed more solution-oriented navigation traces than female students. In a tentative exploratory path model, flow-experience and navigation style could be identified as mediating variables. The findings are interpreted in terms of a more effective use of trial-and-error strategies and a preference for tinkering behavior by males.
Zusammenfassung. Bisherige Forschung ergab, dass Frauen bei der Arbeit am Computer benachteiligt sind. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht mögliche Erklärungen. Wir nutzten das kognitiv-motivationale Prozessmodell (Vollmeyer & Rheinberg, 1999, 2000) um zu testen, ob Motivation den Geschlechtsunterschied erklären kann. Das Modell nimmt an, dass die Eingangsmotivation die Strategien und die Motivation während des Lernens beeinflusst, die dann wiederum auf die Leistung wirken. Studenten und Studentinnen einer Einführungsvorlesung in Statistik (N = 40) mussten in 30 Minuten vier Statistikaufgaben mit dem SPSS-Programm bearbeiten. Gemessen wurden die Eingangsmotivation, der funktionale Zustand (i.e., Flow) während der Aufgabenbearbeitung, der Navigationsstil und die Leistung. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Studenten schneller und besser die Aufgaben bearbeiteten als die Studentinnen. Studenten zeigten einen stärker lösungsorientierten Navigationsstil als Studentinnen. In einer explorativen Pfadanalyse erwiesen sich Flow und der Navigationsstil als Mediatoren. Die Ergebnisse werden so interpretiert, dass Studenten effektivere Versuch-und-Irrtum-Strategien benutzen.
References
1993). Rules of the mind . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1957). Motivational determinants of risktaking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359– 372
(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
(2006). Tinkering and gender in end-user programmers' debugging. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'06), Montreal, Canada, April 2006, 231– 240
(2005). Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) Anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8, 21– 31
(2006). Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of internet-based learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1027– 1042
(2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) Scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 133– 153
(2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320– 334
(1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
(2002). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes toward the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 521– 535
(2000). Computer self-efficacy and gender: A cross cultural study of Scotland and Romania. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 1037– 1044
(2004). Les usages d'Internet des étudiants: Facteurs affectants l'intensité, l'orientation et la signification des pratiques. [Students internet use: Factors determining extent, scope and significance] Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 33, 429– 452
(2006). Screen Virtuoso Pro 2.50 . Miami: Author
(1998). Empfehlungen zur Hochschulentwicklung durch Multimedia in Studium und Lehre . [Recommendations for university development by multimedia in teaching and research]. Retrieved May 25, 2007, from www.wissenschaftsrat.de/texte/3536-98.pdf
(2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2823– 2837
(2001). Gender and the internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 4, 363– 379
(2003). Comparing self-reports to traces of studying behavior as representations of students' studying and achievement. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 159– 171
(1992). Interest, learning and development. In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1944). Level of aspiration. In J. McHunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 333-378). New York: Ronald Press
(2002). Computernutzung und Neue Medien im Studium . [Computer use and new media in higher education]. Bonn, Germany: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
(Ed. (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? - What PISA studies tell us . Paris: OECD Publications
2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: Challenging stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 149– 159
(2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen [A questionnaire to assess current motivation in learning situations]. Diagnostica, 47, 57– 66
(2003). Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens. [The assessment of flow]. In J. Stiensmeier-Pelster & F. Rheinberg (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept [Assessment of motivation and self-concept] (pp. 261-279). Göttingen: Hogrefe
(2004). Searching for information on-line and off-line: Gender differences among middle school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 229– 252
(1999). Computer-related success and failure: A longitudinal field study of the factors influencing computer-related performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 1– 10
(2000). Cognitive, motivation, and affective processes associated with computer-related performance: A path analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 199– 222
(2006). Exploring the influence of gender on the web usage via partial least squares. Behavior & Information Technology, 25, 19– 36
(2004). Laptops in der Schule - ein Weg zur Überwindung des Digital Divide zwischen Jungen und Mädchen. [Laptop computers in the classroom - A way to overcome the technological gender gap among students]? Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 16, 142– 154
(2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research - Online, 8(2), 23– 74 Retrieved December 21, 2006, from www.mpr-online.de/
(2002). Inhibited power motivation and persuasive communication: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality, 70, 553– 582
(2003). Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 319– 334
(2006). StatWin Pro 7.5.5 . Perm, Russia: Author
(in prep.). Vorgehensweisen von Novizen bei der Aufgabenbearbeitung mit SPSS . [Novices' task solving behavior with SPSS]. Unpublished master's thesis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt a. Main, Germany
(2004). Divides in succession: Possession, skills and use of New Media for societal participation. In E.P. Bucy (Ed.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use (pp. 233-254). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
(2006). Gender differences in learning the SPSS-software. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2323-2328). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1999). Motivation and metacognition when learning a complex system. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 541– 554
(2000). Does motivation affect performance via persistence?. Learning and Instruction, 10, 293– 309
(2006). Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 239– 253
(1996). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes: It depends on what you ask. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 275– 289
(1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1– 22
(2002). The development of competence beliefs. In A. Wigfield & J.S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91-122). San Diego: Academic Press
(