The Effect of Followers’ Belongingness Needs on Leaders’ Procedural Fairness Enactment
Mediation Through Interpersonal and Team Attraction
Abstract
An important component of ethical leadership entails leaders’ enactment of procedural fairness. The present two studies examined the role of followers’ relational motives as antecedents of leaders’ adherence to procedural fairness rules and explored the mediating role of attraction. In an experimental study, we demonstrated that followers’ belongingness needs influenced leaders’ inclination to grant them voice. This finding was corroborated in a multisource field study of organizational supervisors. Furthermore, these two studies demonstrated that the effect of followers’ belongingness needs on the enactment of fair procedures was mediated through a process of interpersonal and group attraction. We discuss the relevance of these findings for theories of procedural rule adherence as a dependent variable and for the literature on ethical leadership.
References
(1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 188–218.
(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
(2011). Fairness as social responsibility: A moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. British Journal of Management, 22, S47–S58.
(2009). Towards a “fairer” conception of process fairness: Why, when and how more may not always be better than less. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 183–216.
(2000). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
(2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.
(2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
(2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.
(2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.
(2006). Effects of procedural fairness and leader support on interpersonal relationships among group members. Group Dynamics, Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 309–328.
(2011). Birds of a feather: Leader-follower similarity and procedural fairness effects on cooperation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 388–415.
(2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In , Advances in organizational justice (pp. 119–151). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
(2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164–209.
(2009). Organizational justice and behavioral ethics: Promises and prospects. Behavioral Ethics Quarterly, 19, 193–233.
(2006). Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 211–228.
(2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 151–218.
(2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 858–866.
(2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297–311.
(2011). Social perception as induction and inference: An integrative model of intergroup differentiation, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 66–83.
(2004). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. London, UK: Wiley.
(1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.
(2001). Fairness as a dependent variable: Why tough times can lead to bad management. In , Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (pp. 97–118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2010). Attribute framing affects the perceived fairness of health care allocation principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 11–20.
(1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership – development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years – applying a multilevel multidomain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.
(1991). Social attraction, personal attraction and self-categorization: A field study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175–180.
(2003). Leader-member relations and social identity. In , Leadership and power – identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 18–33). London, CA: Sage.
(2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30, 96–112.
(1998). What motivates fairness? The role of subordinate assertive behavior on managers’ interactional fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 731–744.
(2001). Identity and trust in organizations: One anatomy of a productive but problematic relationship. In , Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 167–180). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
(
2005 ). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript, Wake Forest University.(1980). What should be done with equity theory?: New approaches to the fairness in social relationships. In , Social exchange theory (pp. 27–55). New York, NY: Plenum.
(1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 345–355.
(2009). Fairness at the group level: Justice climate and intraunit justice climate. Journal of Management, 35, 564–599.
(1995). Equity, equality, or need – the effects of organizational culture on the allocation of benefits and burdens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 276–286.
(2007). The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences. Personnel Psychology, 60, 929–963.
(2008). Toward a more complete understanding of the reciprocity of liking effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 477–498.
(1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127–137.
(1999). The manager giveth, the manager taketh away: Variation in distribution/recovery rules due to resource type and cultural orientation. Journal of Management, 25, 723–757.
(2010). Increasing interpersonal and informational justice when communicating negative news: The role of the manager’s empathic concern and moral development. Journal of Management, 36, 555–578.
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
(2009). An actor-focused model of justice rule adherence and violation: The role of managerial motives and discretion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 756–769.
(2007). Justice as a dependent variable: Subordinate charisma as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1597–1609.
(2009). Exploring the “lost and found” of justice theory and research. Social Justice Research, 22, 98–116.
(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In , The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
(2009). Ethics and rule adherence in groups. In , Psychological perspectives on ethical behaviour and decision making (pp. 215–232). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
(1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.
(2009). The influence of distributive justice on lying for and stealing from a supervisor. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 507–518.
(2007). Leadership and fairness: The state of the art. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 113–140.
(1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
(1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor subordinate interactions – a laboratory experiment and field-study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487–499.
(2010). Do unfair procedures predict employees’ ethical behavior by deactivating formal regulations? Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 411–425.
