My Share Is Fair, So I Don’t Care
The Moderating Role of Distributive Justice in the Perception of Leaders’ Self-Serving Behavior
Abstract
In the present research we argue that despite leaders’ self-serving actions, followers can still perceive them as being fair and thus ethical. First, we developed a scale to capture followers’ perceptions of their leaders’ self-serving behavior. Second, in a field study we showed that even though leaders may act self-servingly, if employees perceive their own outcomes as fair (i.e., ethical), they will not see much harm in the leader’s behavior. Finally, in a third study (a scenario study) we replicated the findings of our second study and examined the process underlying the proposed relationships. More specifically, we revealed that people experience increased uncertainty in the face of a self-serving leader and that distributive justice helps them deal with the emotional consequences of these feelings of uncertainty. In sum, our findings indicate that people care less about a self-serving leader as long as their share is fair.
References
(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In , Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1991). Multiple regressions: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York, NY: Sage.
(2000). Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26, 171–193.
(2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.
(2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747–758.
(2003). High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 51–68.
(1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189–206.
(2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
(2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.
(2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
(2004). The influence of accuracy as a function of leader’s bias: The role of trustworthiness in the psychology of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 293–304.
(2006). When authorities influence followers’ affect: The interactive effect of procedural justice and transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 322–351.
(2007). Emotional effects of distributive justice as a function of autocratic leader behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1385–1404.
(2007). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 639–649.
(2010). On being the leader and acting fairly: A contingency approach. In , Social psychology and organizations (pp. 39–65). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
(1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305–323.
(2012). No harm, no foul: Explaining the outcome bias in ethical judgments. Manuscript in preparation.
(1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.
(1961). Social behaviour: Its elementary forms. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
(2004). LISREL 8.5: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
(2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 923–947.
(1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657–669.
(1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In , Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
(2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In , Research in organizational behavior, (Vol. 24, pp. 181–223). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
(2005). The allure of toxic leaders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.
(2002). Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 545–559.
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
(1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
(2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
(2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337.
(1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434–443.
(2003). Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review. Social Justice Research, 16, 309–341.
(2005). All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 767–783.
(2006). Violating equality in social dilemmas: Emotional and retributive reactions as a function of trust, attribution, and sincerity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 894–906.
(2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.
(2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289.
(2010). Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1009–1031.
(1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22, 103–136.
(2001). Procedural strategies for gaining deference: Increasing social harmony or creating false consciousness?. In , Social influences on ethical behavior in organizations (pp. 69–87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In , Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 769–780.
(2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In , Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 34, pp. 1–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449–1458.
(2007). Leadership and fairness: Taking stock and looking ahead. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 113–140.
