Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Editorial

Gewissheit und Skepsis: Wissenschaftskommunikation als Forschungsthema der Psychologie

Published Online:July 03, 2017https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000359
Free first page

Literatur

  • acatech (Hrsg.). (2012). ACATECH Position: Perspektiven der Biotechnologie-Kommunikation. Kontroversen – Randbedingungen – Formate (acatech POSITION). Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar

  • Bauer, J., Berthold, K., Hefter, M., Prenzel, M. & Renkl, A. (2017). Wie können Lehrkräfte und ihre Schülerinnen und Schüler lernen, fragile Evidenz zu verstehen und zu nutzen? Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 188 – 192. Abstract, Google Scholar

  • Besley, J. C. (2014). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. In National Science Board, Ed., Science and Engineering Indicators 2014 (pp. 1 – 53). Arlington VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 14 – 01). Google Scholar

  • Bodmer, W. (1985). The Public Understanding of Science. London: Royal Society. Google Scholar

  • Bromme, R. & Beelmann, A. (2016). Transfer entails communication: The Public Understanding of (social) science as a Stage and a Play for implementing evidence based prevention knowledge and programs. Prevention Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0686-8 Google Scholar

  • Bromme, R. & Goldman, S. (Guest Eds.). (2014a). Understanding the Public Understanding of Science: Psychological Approaches (Special Issue). Educational Psychologist.49 (2). Google Scholar

  • Bromme, R. & Goldman, S. (2014b). The Public’s Bounded Understanding of Science. Educational Psychologist, 49 (2), 59 – 69. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.921572 Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Bromme, R. & Kienhues, D. (2014). Wissenschaftsverständnis und Wissenschaftskommunikation. In T. SeidelA. KrappHrsg., Pädagogische Psychologie (6. Aufl., S. 55 – 81). Weinheim: Beltz. Google Scholar

  • Collins, H. (2014). Are we all scientific experts now? Cambridge UK: Polity Press. Google Scholar

  • Dunwoody, S. & Peters, H.-P. (Guest Eds.). (2016). Scientific Uncertainty in Mediated Communication (Special Issue). Public Understanding of Science. 25 (8). Google Scholar

  • Feinstein, N. R. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education. 95 (1), 168 – 185. doi: 10.1002/sce.20414 Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Groot, J. M. de, Steg, L. & Poortinga, W. (2013). Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis, 33, 307 – 317. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01845.x Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D. & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in Science and the Science of Trust. In B. BlöbaumEd.. Trust and Communication in a Digitalized World. Models and Concepts of Trust Research (pp. 143 – 159). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar

  • Jucks, R. & Mayweg-Paus, E. (Guest Eds.). (2016). Learning Through Communication: How Arguing About Scientific Information Contributes to Learning (Special Issue). Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/German Journal of Educational Psychology, 30 (2/3). Google Scholar

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93, 1449 – 1475. doi: 10.2307/3132137 Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Keil, F. C. (2010). The feasibility of folk science. Cognitive Science, 34, 826 – 862. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01108.x Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Knuth-Herzig, K., Horz, H. & Isberner, M.-B. (2017). Der Einfluss von Abbildungen auf das Verstehen von und Vertrauen in wissenschaftsbasierte Informationen. Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 198 – 202. Abstract, Google Scholar

  • Maier, M. & Post, S. (Guest Eds). (2016). Scientific uncertainty in the public discourse. How scientists, media and audiences present und process scientific evidence (Special Issue). Communications – the European Journal of Communication Research, 41 (3). Google Scholar

  • Maier, M. & Taddicken, M. (Guest Eds.). (2013). Audience Perspectives on Science Communication (Special Issue). Journal of Media Psychology, 25 (1). Link, Google Scholar

  • Lewalter, D. & Schwan, S. (2017). Wissenschaftskommunikation in naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Museen aus psychologischer Sicht. Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 182 – 187. Abstract, Google Scholar

  • Nestler, S., Leckelt, M., Back, M.D., Beck, I. von der, Cress, U. & Oeberst, A. (2017). Produktion von naturwissenschaftlichen Informationen im Internet am Beispiel von Wikipedia. Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 172 – 176. Abstract, Google Scholar

  • Pew Research Center. (2015). A Look at what the public knows and does not know about science. Washington, D.C.: PEW. Google Scholar

  • Pfister, H.-P., Böhm, G. & Bassarak, C. (2017). Modi der Verständlichkeit und die Magie des Unverständlichen. Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 203 – 207. Abstract, Google Scholar

  • Richter, T. & Maier, J. (im Druck). Verstehen konfligierender wissenschaftlicher Informationen durch Laien: Probleme, zugrundeliegende kognitive Prozesse und psychologische Interventionen. Psychologische Rundschau. Google Scholar

  • Richter, T. & Rapp, D.N. (Guest Eds.). (2014). Comprehension and Validation of Text Information (Special Issue). Discourse Processes, 51 (1 – 2). Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Rothmund, T., Gollwitzer, M., Nauroth, P. & Bender, J. (2017). Motivierte Wissenschaftsrezeption. Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 193 – 197. Abstract, Google Scholar

  • Schäfer, M.S., Kristiansen, S. & Bonfadelli, H. (Hrsg.). (2015). Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag. Google Scholar

  • Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D. & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic Cognition, Motivated Reasoning, and Conceptual Change. Educational Psychologist, 49 (2), 123 – 138. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.916216. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (Guest Eds.). (2013). Multiple Document Comprehension (Special Issue). Cognition and Instruction, 3. Google Scholar

  • Stadtler, M., Winter, S., Scharrer, L., Thomm, E., Krämer, N. & Bromme, R. (2017). Selektion, Integration und Evaluation: Wie wir das Internet nutzen, wenn wir uns über Wissenschaft informieren wollen. Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 177 – 181. Abstract, Google Scholar

  • Suldovsky, B. (2016). In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences. Public Understanding of Science, 25, 415 – 426. DOI: 10.1177/0963662516629750 Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Tabak, I. (2015). Functional scientific literacy: Seeing the science within the words and across the web. In L. CornoE. M. AndermanEds., Handbook of educational psychology: 3rd edition (pp. 269 – 280). London: Routledge. Google Scholar

  • Weingart, P. (2005). Die Wissenschaft der Öffentlichkeit. Essays zum Verhältnis von Wissenschaft, Medien und Öffentlichkeit. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. Google Scholar

  • Weitze, M.-D. & Heckl, W. M. (2016). Wissenschaftskommunikation – Schlüsselideen, Akteure, Fallbeispiele. Berlin: Springer. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilson, K., Barakat, M., Vohra, S., Ritvo, P. & Boon, H. (2008). Parental views on pediatric vaccination: the impact of competing advocacy coalitions. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 231 – 243. doi: 10.1177/0963662506067662 Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Wood, M. J. & Douglas, K. (2015). Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836 Crossref, Google Scholar