Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.53.4.163

Das Konzept der Romantisierung von Führung (Romance of Leadership) besagt, dass der Einfluss von Führungskräften auf den Unternehmenserfolg überschätzt und der Bedeutung wichtiger Kontextfaktoren zu wenig Beachtung geschenkt wird (Meindl et al., 1985). Als Weiterführung dieses Ansatzes wird in dieser Studie untersucht, inwieweit Romance of Leadership die Qualität von Managemententscheidungen negativ beeinflussen kann. Dazu wurden 124 Führungskräften standardisierte Managementszenarien vorgelegt, bei denen es um die Befürwortung oder Ablehnung von Projekten ging. In den Szenarien wurden die Erfolgsaussichten der Projektleiter systematisch variiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Personen, die stärker zur Romantisierung von Führung neigen, weniger rationale und angemessene Entscheidungen treffen. Obwohl explizit darauf hingewiesen wurde, dass der Erfolg eines bestimmten Projekts nicht von dem Projektleiter abhängig ist, machen Personen, die stärker zur Romantisierung von Führung neigen, ihre Entscheidung dennoch von den Erfolgsaussichten der Führungskraft abhängig. Die theoretischen und praktischen Implikationen z. B. für Führungskräftetrainings werden diskutiert.


Romance of Leadership and the quality of management decision-making

It is a basic assumption of the concept of Romance of Leadership that the influence of leaders on success or failure of organizations is overestimated, while the influence of context factors is underestimated (Meindl et al., 1985). Extending this approach, in this study the potential negative impact of Romance of Leadership on management decision-making was examined. Therefore in an experimental setting, 124 leaders were presented several standardized managerial decision scenarios dealing with the approval or disapproval of projects. In the scenarios the probability of success of the leader was systematically varied. Results revealed that persons with a higher level of Romance of Leadership make less rational decision. Though the participants were informed that the success of a specific project did not depend on the project manager, persons higher on Romance of Leadership based their decision on the leaderʼs probability of success. The theoretical and practical implications, e. g., for executive training, are discussed.

Literatur

  • Bazerman, M. H. (2005). Judgement in managerial decision making. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar

  • Calder, B. J. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw, G. R. Salancik (Eds.) , New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 179 – 204). Chicago: St. Clair. Google Scholar

  • Chugh, D. (2004). Societal and managerial implications of implicit social cognition: Why milliseconds matter. Social Justice Research, 17, 203 – 222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Day, D.. V , Lord, R. G. (1988). Executive leadership and organizational performance: Suggestions for a new theory and methodology. Journal of Management, 14, 453 – 464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eden, D. , Leviatan, U. (1975). Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 736 – 741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eden, D. , Leviatan, U. (2005). From implicit personality theory to implicit leadership theory: A side-trip on the way to implicit organization theory. In B. Schyns, J. R. Meindl (Eds.) , The leadership horizon series: Implicit leadership theories – essays and explorations (Vol. 3, pp. 3 – 14). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Google Scholar

  • Epitropaki, O. , Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of implicit leadership theories, leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659 – 676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. (2005). Personality and romance of leadership. In B. Schyns, J. R. Meindl (Eds.) , Implicit leadership theories: Essays and exploration (pp. 199 – 226). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Google Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Goihl, K. (2002). Transformational leadership and commitment. In J. Felfe (Ed.) , Organizational development and leadership. Frankfurt/Main: Verlag Peter Lang. Google Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Petersen, L.-E. (2007). Romance of leadership and management decision making. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 1 – 24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Schyns, B. (2006). Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of extraversion, neuroticism, personal need for structure, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 708 – 739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleishman, E. A. (1973). Twenty years of consideration and structure. In E. A. Fleishman, J. G. Hunt (Eds.) , Current developments in the study of leadership (pp. 1 – 37). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar

  • Hollander, E. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar

  • House, R. J. , Hanges, P. J. , Javidan, M. , Dorfman, P. , Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. , Bono, J. E. , Ilies, R. , Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765 – 780. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahneman, D. , Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237 – 251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keller, T. (1999). Images of the familiar: Individual differences and implicit leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 589 – 607. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenney, R. A. , Schwartz-Kenney, B. M. , Blascovich, J. (1996). Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1128 – 1143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kerr, S. , Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375 – 403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W. , Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “Freesing”. Psychological Review, 103, 263 – 283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lock, M. , Wheeler, R. (2005). LJI – Leadership judgement indicator. Oxford: Hogrefe. Google Scholar

  • Lord, R. G. , Emrich, C. G. (2000). Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 551 – 579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lord, R. G. , Maher, K. J. (1990). Alternative information-processing models and their implications for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 15, 9 – 28. Google Scholar

  • Lord, R. G. , Maher, K. J. (1993). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. London: Routledge. Google Scholar

  • Meindl, J. R. (1990). On leadership: An alternative to the conventional wisdom. In B. M. Shaw, L. L. Cummings (Eds.) , Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 12, pp. 159 – 203). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar

  • Meindl, J. R. (1993). Reinventing leadership: A radical, social psychological approach. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.) , Social psychology in organizations (pp. 89 – 118). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar

  • Meindl, J. R. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social-constructionist approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 329 – 341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meindl, J. R. (1998). Appendix: Measures and assessments for the romance of leadership approach. In F. Dansereau, F. J. Yammarino (Eds.) , Leadership: The multiple-level approaches, Part B: Contemporary and alternative (pp. 299 – 302). Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar

  • Meindl, J. R. , Ehrlich, S. B. (1988). Developing a “romance of leadership” scale. Proceedings of the Eastern Academy of Management, 30, 133 – 135. Google Scholar

  • Meindl, J. R. , Ehrlich, S. B. , Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78 – 102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nye, J. L. , Forsyth, D. R. (1991). The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals: A test of leadership categorization theory. Small Group Research, 22, 360 – 379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Offermann, L. R. , Kennedy, J. K. , Wirtz, P. W. (1994). Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 43 – 58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pfeffer, J. (1977). The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2, 104 – 112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L. L. Cummings, B. M. Staw (Eds.) , Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, S. 1 – 52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Bommer, W. H. (1996). Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermierʼs substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 380 – 399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, D. J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 294 – 309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schyns, B. (2008). Einflussfaktoren auf die Wahrnehmung von Führung. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52, 182 – 190. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schyns, B. , Meindl, J. R. (2005). An overview of implicit leadership theories and their application in organization practice. In B. Schyns, J. R. Meindl (Eds.) , The leadership horizon series: Implicit leadership theories – essays and explorations (Vol. 3, pp. 15 – 36). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Google Scholar

  • Schyns, B. , Meindl, J. R. , Croon, M. A. (2007). The romance of leadership scale: Cross-cultural testing and refinement, Leadership, 3, 29 – 46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shamir, B. (2007). From passive recipients to active co-producers: Followersʼ role in the leadership process. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. C. Bligh, M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.) , Follower-centered perspectives on leadership – A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl (pp. ix – xxxix). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Google Scholar

  • Tversky, A. , Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124 – 1131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar