Facilitating Health-Oriented Leadership from a Leader’s Perspective
Antecedents at the Organizational, Workplace, and Individual Level
Abstract
Abstract. Health-oriented leadership (HoL) is vital for the improvement of health and an essential part of psychological risk management. However, the relevance of different antecedent factors is unknown. We used data from a Germany-wide online survey with N = 738 leaders. Referring to the JD-R model, we analyzed leaders’ demands and resources that facilitate or impede health-oriented leadership from a leader’s perspective. Moreover, we examined the relevance of contextual factors like branch, company size, and management span. Whereas results show only small differences for contextual factors, we found positive relationships between leaders’ resources, like autonomy and social support, and negative relationships with workplace demands (availability, multitasking) and HoL from a leader’s perspective. At the organizational level, HoL is positively linked to high-performance work practices and health-oriented HRM strategies. From a leader’s perspective, the findings provide evidence for the relevance of favorable working conditions and human resources practices for improving HoL as part of psychological risk management.
Zusammenfassung. Gesundheitsorientierte Führung ist wichtig für den Erhalt der Gesundheit und Bestandteil des psychologischen Risikomanagements. Es gibt jedoch nur wenige Studien zu relevanten Einflussfaktoren. Für die Studie wurden Daten aus einer deutschlandweiten Online-Umfrage mit N = 738 Führungskräften genutzt. In Anlehnung an das JD-R Modell wurden die Anforderungen und Ressourcen von Führungskräften analysiert, die eine gesundheitsorientierte Führung aus Sicht der Führungskräfte erleichtern oder erschweren. Zusätzlich wird die Relevanz weiterer Kontextfaktoren wie Branche, Unternehmensgröße und Führungsspanne untersucht. Während die Ergebnisse nur geringe Unterschiede bezüglich der Kontextfaktoren zeigen, zeigen sich aus Sicht der Führungskräfte positive Zusammenhänge zwischen Ressourcen wie Autonomie und sozialer Unterstützung sowie negative Zusammenhänge mit Stressoren am Arbeitsplatz (Erreichbarkeit, Multitasking) und gesundheitsorientierter Führung. Auf der Organisationsebene zeigen sich positive Zusammenhänge mit high-performance work practices und gesundheitsorientierten Personalmanagementstrategien. Die Befunde belegen aus Sicht der Führungskräfte die Relevanz günstiger Arbeitsbedingungen und personalwirtschaftlicher Praktiken für die Verbesserung gesundheitsorientierter Führung als Teil des psychologischen Risikomanagements.
Literatur
2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
(2020). The leader in the spotlight: Health-oriented leadership and its antecedents and outcomes. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020 (1), 16724 https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.16724abstract
(2010). Arbeitsunterbrechungen und Multitasking: Ein umfassender Überblick zu Theorien und Empirie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Altersdifferenzen. Forschung Projekt F 2220 [Work interruptions and multitasking: a comprehensive review of theories and empirics with special attention to age differences. Research Project F 2220]. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA). Retrieved form http://www.baua.de/de/Publikationen/Fachbeitraege/F2220.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4
(2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22 (3), 309 – 328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
(2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (1), 65 – 74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
(2012). Perceived information and communication technology (ICT) demands on employee outcomes: The moderating effect of organizational ICT support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17 (4), 473 – 491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029837
(2020). Der Fragebogen zur Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastungen (FGBU) [Questionnaire for the risk assessment of mental stress]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 64 (2), 99 – 119. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000318
(2016).
(Gesundheitsförderliche Führung diagnostizieren und umsetzen [Assessing and implementing health-oriented leadership ]. In J. FelfeR. van Dick (Eds.), Handbuch Mitarbeiterführung: Wirtschaftspsychologisches Praxiswissen für Fach- und Führungskräfte (pp. 143 – 156). Springer.2015). European Working Conditions Surveys (EWCS, 2015). Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/de/surveys/european-working-conditions-surveys/sixth-european-working-conditions-survey-2015/ewcs-2015-questionnaire/ewcs-2015-questionnaire-translation/ewcs-2015-questionnaire-translation-language-versions
(Ed.). (2015). Trends der psychologischen Führungsforschung: Neue Konzepte, Methoden und Erkenntnisse [
(Trends in psychological leadership research: New concepts, methods, and insights ]. Hogrefe.2015).
(Gesundheitsförderliche Führung [Health-oriented leadership ]. In J. Felfe (Ed.), Trends der psychologischen Führungsforschung: Neue Konzepte, Methoden und Erkenntnisse (pp. 253 – 264). Hogrefe.2014). The impact of health-oriented leadership on follower health: Development and test of a new instrument measuring health-promoting leadership. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 28(1 – 2), 139 – 161. https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022140280010
(2016). Leadership in extreme contexts. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23 (3), 234 – 247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815627359
(2018). Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 85, 161 – 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.07.004
(2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Toward a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27 (1), 22 – 38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139
(2009). A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. Leadership Quarterly, 20 (6), 897 – 919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.006
(2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. Leadership Quarterly, 28 (1), 178 – 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.006
(2022). High-performance work practices, employee well-being, and supportive leadership: Spillover mechanisms and boundary conditions between HRM and leadership behavior. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33 (10), 2109 – 2137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1841819
(2020). Well-being-oriented HRM configurations: Diffusion, contingencies, and outcomes. Evidence-Based HRM. A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 8 (3), 253 – 271. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-09-2019-0080
(2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5 (1), 103 – 128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
(2016).
(Health at work through health-promoting leadership . In M. WienckeM. CacaceS. Fischer (Eds.), Healthy at work: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 115 – 125). Springer International Publishing.2018). Enhancing employee self-care. European Journal of Health Psychology, 25 (3), 96 – 106. https://doi.org/10.1027/2512-8442/a000014
(2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (5), 1332 – 1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
(2014). An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. The Academy of Management Annals, 8 (1), 1 – 56. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.872335
(2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55 (6), 1264 – 1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088
(2020). Leadership behaviour and leader self-reported well-being: A review, integration and meta-analytic examination. Work & Stress, 26, 1 – 23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2019.1617369
(2021). When and how health‐oriented leadership relates to employee well‐being: The role of expectations, self‐care, and LMX. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51 (4), 404 – 424. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12744
(2020). An expanded conceptualization of line managers’ involvement in human resource management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105 (2), 111 – 129. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000426
(2021). Healthy leadership in turbulent times: The effectiveness of health‐oriented leadership in crisis. British Journal of Management, 32 (4), 1203 – 1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12498
(2021). The show must go on: The effects of crisis on health-oriented leadership and follower exhaustion during Covid-19 pandemic. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 65(4), 231 – 243. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000369
(2022). Mission impossible? Effects of crisis, leader and follower strain on health-oriented leadership. European Management Journal, 40 (3), 384 – 392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.001
(2019). Caring for oneself or for others? How consistent and inconsistent profiles of health-oriented leadership are related to follower strain and health. Frontiers in Psychology, 10 Article 2456 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02456
(2022). Health-oriented leadership as a job resource: Can staff care buffer the effects of job demands on employee health and job satisfaction? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37 (2), 139 – 152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2021-0067
(2021).
(Gesundheitsförderliche Führungskompetenz entwickeln [Developing health-oriented leadership skills ]. In A. MichelA. Hoppe (Eds.), Handbuch Gesundheitsförderung bei der Arbeit. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28654-5_14-11984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
(2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (5), 764 – 775. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
(2018). Managing people in organizations: Integrating the study of HRM and leadership. Human Resource Management Review, 28 (3), 249 – 257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.002
(2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 114 – 121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
(2005). Irritation Scale: A tool to assess psychological strain in the work context; scale and item parameters from 15 studies. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 49 (1), 44 – 48. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.49.1.44
(2017). Leadership, followers’ mental health and job performance in organizations: A comprehensive meta-analysis from an occupational health perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38 (3), 327 – 350. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2124
(2011). Social support and employee well-being: The conditioning effect of perceived patterns of supportive exchange. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52 (1), 123 – 139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395024
(2021). A stress perspective on antecedents of abusive supervision: Blaming the organisation when exhausted supervisors abuse. Journal of Management & Organization, 27 (2), 361 – 381. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.71
(2019). Employee performance, well‐being, and differential effects of human resource management subdimensions: Mutual gains or conflicting outcomes? Human Resource Management Journal, 29 (3), 509 – 526. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12203
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879 – 903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
(2013). A high performance work practices taxonomy. Journal of Management, 39 (5), 1184 – 1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478184
(2017). HOL: An instrument to assess health-oriented leadership. Hogrefe.
(2020). A systematic review and critique of research on ”healthy leadership.” Leadership Quarterly, 31 (1), 101335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101335
(2019). The impact of health-oriented leadership on police officers’ physical health, burnout, depression and well-being. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 13 (2), 186 – 200. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pay067
(2017). Exploring the relationship between HRM and firm performance: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Human Resource Management Review, 27 (1), 87 – 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.005
(2010). Der Work Design Questionnaire [The Work Design Questionnaire]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 54 (1), 1 – 28. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000002
(2021). The effectiveness of health-oriented leadership interventions for the improvement of mental health of employees in the health care sector: A systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 94 (2), 203 – 220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01583-w
(2017). Individual differences as antecedents of leader behavior: Toward an understanding of multi-level outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 28 (1), 40 – 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.011
(2020). Health-oriented leadership and mental health from supervisor and employee perspectives: A multilevel and multisource approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 614803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614803
(2022). Feeling anxious and abusing low performers: A multilevel model of high performance work system and abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43 (1), 91 – 111. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2558
(2018). How do high-performance work systems affect individual outcomes: A multilevel perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00586
(