Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Measurement Invariance of Test Anxiety Across Four School Subjects

Published Online:November 10, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000676

Abstract

Abstract. School-subject-specific test anxieties have been widely examined, but there is a lack of analyses of measurement invariance of test anxiety across subjects. In order to preclude a mixture of test anxiety construct differences across school subjects with actual test anxiety differences and to ensure meaningful comparisons of test anxiety across school subjects, we examined such measurement invariance. Two test anxiety factors (worry and emotionality) were inspected across four school subjects (mathematics, physics, German, and English) in a sample of secondary school students (N = 1,280). Strict measurement invariance was ascertained (i.e., comparable factor loadings, intercepts, and residual variances of the items of worry and emotionality factors across school subjects). The correlations of subject-specific test anxiety factors with subject-specific academic self-concepts and grades showed a convergent/divergent correlation pattern, thereby supporting criterion-related validity. The results of this study provide insights into the comparability of test anxiety assessments across school subjects.

References

  • Arens, A. K., Becker, M., & Möller, J. (2017). Social and dimensional comparisons in math and verbal test anxiety: Within- and cross-domain relations with achievement and the mediating role of academic self-concept. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baudson, T. G., Jung, N., & Freund, P. A. (2017). Measurement invariance in a grid-based measure of academic self-concept. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 467–470. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000298 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bauer, D. J. (2017). A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000077 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gaspard, H., Wigfield, A., Jiang, Y., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Marsh, H. W. (2018). Dimensional comparisons: How academic track students’ achievements are related to their expectancy and value beliefs across multiple domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.10.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goetz, T., Cronjaeger, H., Frenzel, A. C., Lüdtke, O., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Academic self-concept and emotion relations: Domain specificity and age effects. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Between- and within domain relations of students’ academic emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.715 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Preckel, F., Goetz, T., & Martin, R. (2016). Developmental dynamics of general and school-subject-specific components of academic self-concept, academic interest, and academic anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00356 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greiff, S., & Scherer, R. (2018). Still comparing apples with oranges? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(3), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000487 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Haag, L., & Goetz, T. (2012). Mathe ist schwierig und Deutsch aktuell: Vergleichende Studie zur Charakterisierung von Schulfächern aus Schülersicht.[Math is difficult and German up to date: A study on the characterization of subject domains from students’ perspective]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 59(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2012.art03d First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 47–77. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hodapp, V. (1991). Das Prüfungsängstlichkeitsinventar TAI-G: Eine erweiterte und modifizierte Version mit vier Komponenten [The Test Anxiety Inventory: An expanded and modified version with four components]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 5(2), 121–130. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hodapp, V., Rohrmann, S., & Ringeisen, T. (2011). Prüfungsangstfragebogen [German Test Anxiety Questionnaire]. Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Keith, N., Hodapp, V., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the German Test Anxiety Inventory: A construct validation. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 16(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/1061580031000095416 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Liebert, R. M., & Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety. Psychological Reports, 20(3), 975–978. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1967.20.3.975 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 439–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1996). The distinctiveness of affects in specific school subjects: An application of confirmatory factor analysis with the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988. American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 665–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033003665 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2019). MPlus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rost, D. H., & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2002). Facetten des schulischen Selbstkonzepts. Ein Verfahren zur Messung des differentiellen Selbstkonzepts schulischer Leistungen und Fähigkeiten (DISK-Gitter) [Facets of academic self-concept. Development of a self-concept grid: Psychometric properties and some validity data]. Diagnostica, 48(3), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.48.3.130 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schilling, S. R., Sparfeldt, J. R., & John, M. (2005). Besser in Mathe, besorgter in Deutsch? – Beziehungen zwischen Schulleistungen, Selbstkonzepten und Prüfungsängsten im Rahmen des I/E-Modells [Better in math, more worried in German? Relationships between academic achievement, academic self-concepts, and test anxieties in the context of the I/E model]. In S. R. SchillingJ. R. SparfeldtC. PruiskenEds., Aktuelle Aspekte pädagogisch-psychologischer Forschung (pp. 159–178). Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Seipp, B., & Schwarzer, C. (1991). Angst und Leistung – Eine Meta-Analyse empirischer Befunde [Anxiety and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of empirical results]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 5(2), 85–97. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sparfeldt, J. R., Buch, S. R., Rost, D. H., & Lehmann, G. (2008). Akkuratesse selbstberichteter Zensuren [Accuracy of self-reported school grades]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 55(1), 68–75. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sparfeldt, J. R., Rost, D. H., Baumeister, U. M., & Christ, O. (2013). Test anxiety in written and oral exams. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sparfeldt, J. R., Schilling, S. R., Rost, D. H., Stelzl, I., & Peipert, D. (2005). Leistungsängstlichkeit: Facetten, Fächer, Fachfacetten? [Test anxiety: The relevance of anxiety factors as well as school subjects]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.19.4.225 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Sparfeldt, J. R., Schilling, S. R., Rost, D. H., & Thiel, A. (2006). Blocked versus randomized format of questionnaires – A confirmatory multigroup analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 961–974. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405285906 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 43(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. Plenum Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2011). Anxiety 101. Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar