Skip to main content
Free AccessPosition paper

Exercise therapy for chronic symptomatic peripheral artery disease

A clinical consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases in collaboration with the European Society of Vascular Medicine and the European Society for Vascular Surgery

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001112

Abstract

Summary: All guidelines worldwide strongly recommend exercise as a pillar in the management of patients affected by lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). Exercise therapy in this setting presents different modalities, and a structured programme provides optimal results. This clinical consensus paper is intended to promote and assist the set up of comprehensive exercise programmes and best advice for patients with symptomatic chronic PAD. Different exercise training protocols specific for patients with PAD are presented. Data on patient assessment and outcome measures are described based on the current best evidence. The document ends by highlighting supervised exercise programme access disparities across Europe and the evidence gaps requiring further research.

Abbreviations

6MWD

Six-minute walking distance

6MWT

Six-minute walk test

ABI

Ankle brachial index

AMP

Adenosine monophosphate

CV

Cardiovascular

CVD

Cardiovascular disease

ESVS

European Society for Vascular Surgery

GPS

Global positioning system

HR

Heart rate

HRQoL

Health related quality of life

IC

Intermittent claudication

MWD

Maximum walking distance

NADPH

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

NO

Nitric oxide

PAD

Peripheral artery disease

PFWD

Pain free walking distance

RCT

Randomised controlled trial

RPE

Rate of perceived exertion

SET

Supervised exercise training

SF-36

Short Form Health 36

SMD

Standardised mean difference

VEGF

Vascular endothelial growth factor

WIQ

Walking Impairment Questionnaire

Introduction

Physical activity, including regular exercise, is one of the pillars of cardiovascular (CV) health and a major component in the management of patients with most CV diseases (CVDs). In 2020, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) issued a guideline document addressing the main aspects of exercise therapy and sports practice for cardiac diseases [1].

In this consensus document, the acronym PAD will be used to indicate lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Peripheral artery disease is one of the most prevalent clinical presentations of atherosclerotic disease, affecting ~237 million people worldwide [2] The first symptoms of PAD are usually related to walking impairment, and the 2017 European Society of Cardiology/European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines on the management of PAD underscore the importance of exercise therapy, preferably supervised, for the management of patients with intermittent claudication (IC) [3]. Similarly, the 2019 PAD guidelines of the European Society of Vascular Medicine encourage structured exercise for symptomatic PAD patients [4]. However, none of the aforementioned documents provided in depth guidance for exercise therapy in this specific setting.

To address this gap, the ESC Working Group on Aortic and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, the European Society of Vascular Medicine, and the ESVS joined in a collaborative effort aiming to provide a roadmap and guidance for the set up and implementation of exercise therapy programmes for patients with PAD (electronic supplementary material [ESM] 1).

Consensus statements

  1. 1.
    For patients with PAD and exercise induced limb symptoms of vascular origin, supervised exercise programmes should be the first line treatment modality.
  2. 2.
    For patients with PAD undergoing revascularisation, supervised exercise programmes should be included as adjuvant therapy.
  3. 3.
    Supervised exercise programmes should ideally be coordinated by vascular physicians, and sessions should ideally be supervised by clinical exercise physiologists or physiotherapists.
  4. 4.
    Prior to the initiation of exercise training, a complete medical history, examination, and screening for contraindications should be investigated.
  5. 5.
    Measures of walking ability, functional status, and quality of life should be assessed at the beginning and end of the programme to determine the patient’s response to exercise training. Clinical outcomes and patient experience should also be documented.
  6. 6.
    Walking training (overground, pole striding, treadmill) should be proposed as first line exercise modality. When walking is not an option, alternative training modalities (resistance and strength training, arm cranking, cycling, combinations of exercise) should be performed.
  7. 7.
    The training frequency should be at least three times per week.
  8. 8.
    The training session duration should last a minimum of 30 minutes.
  9. 9.
    The training programme duration should last a minimum of three months.
  10. 10.
    Both claudication pain (A) and exercise intensity (B, based on common training intensity measures such as heart rate [HR] or the rate of perceived exertion [RPE] on Borg’s scale) should be evaluated during training sessions:
    • a.
      The current consensus is that patients should exercise to moderate – high claudication pain based on strong evidence. However, some trials have recently demonstrated improvement in walking ability using a low or no pain approach. As claudication pain is a commonly cited barrier to exercise, the universal prescription of high pain exercise may lead to poor uptake of, and adherence to, exercise training programmes. A more flexible approach to exercise prescription may therefore be required, considering the patient’s needs and preferences and what might achieve a high level of (long term) adherence.
    • b.
      Following a lead in period of low to moderate exercise intensity, a gradual progression to vigorous exercise intensity may be proposed if well tolerated by the patient.
  11. 11.
    If supervised exercise is not available or feasible, a structured community or home-based exercise programme that includes behaviour change techniques should be proposed.
  12. 12.
    Supervised exercise programmes should include structured CVD and PAD risk factor reduction education and counselling. Smoking cessation should be a cornerstone of risk factor counselling.
  13. 13.
    Following initial exercise training (supervised or home based), patients are encouraged to sustain lifelong and high levels of regular physical activity.

Pathophysiology of intermittent claudication and functional impairment

IC is characterised by exertional leg pain limiting walking ability [5, 6, 7]. PAD induces a wide range of exercise related symptoms experienced by nearly half of the PAD population [8]. The classical IC symptomology was first defined as calf pain, discomfort, or fatigue appearing during exercise and forcing the patient to stop [9]. Typically, IC is relieved within two to five minutes of discontinuation of exertion [9]. Apart from this typical symptom, it is now admitted that some patients with PAD may present atypical exercise induced limb symptoms [10]. These may be localised in lower limb muscles other than the calf; may be present at rest; may be described by patients as burning, compressive feeling, or just fatigue without pain; and may mimic limb pain due to spinal stenosis. Exercise induced limb symptoms in PAD are caused by a metabolic mismatch between oxygen demand and supply [5]. The mismatch is linked to the reduction of the arterial lumen by the atherosclerotic process, but it also induces cellular and metabolic disorders that contribute to the functional impairment [11]. Mechanisms of exercise induced symptoms are multifactorial among which nociceptive pain [12], nerve dysfunction [13], and skeletal muscle abnormalities [11] are proposed.

Potential exertional limb symptom driving mechanisms in addition to arterial obstruction and reduced perfusion include inflammation, vascular dysfunction, reduced microvascular flow, impaired angiogenesis, and altered skeletal muscle function [14, 15, 16] (Figure 1). A healthy vascular endothelium produces several vasodilator substances, including nitric oxide (NO), which has pluripotent vascular benefits such as platelet inhibition, smooth muscle cell proliferation inhibition, leucocyte adhesion prevention, and angiogenesis induction. Diminished NO bioactivity in the lower limbs prevents increased blood flow with exercise [11]. Vascular dysfunction may also exacerbate the vasoconstrictive effects of catecholamines and limit flow mediated dilation [17, 18, 19, 20]. Inadequate angiogenesis and collateral vessel formation may potentiate limb ischaemia and serve as a mechanism driving functional impairment [21]. Skeletal muscle ischaemia may drive local inflammation, exacerbating symptoms and altering muscle metabolism [22, 23, 24].

Figure 1 Pathophysiology of limb symptoms in peripheral artery disease.

Patients with PAD present with impaired walking endurance [25], slower walking speed [26, 27, 28], gait abnormalities [26, 27, 29, 30, 31], poorer muscle strength [32], and poorer balance [33, 34] compared with individuals without PAD. They may also reduce their walking activity and total activity to avoid leg symptoms [35], and studies have shown a functional decline occurring over time [25, 28, 36].

Vascular and functional assessment in peripheral artery disease

Vascular assessment

General assessment of CV risk factors should be performed prior to exercise training rehabilitation to improve preventive measures and reach preventive goals. Ankle brachial index (ABI) should be assessed before starting a training programme to detect and diagnose PAD and assess disease severity (Figure 2) [3]. The measurement of ABI after exercise is also important to further detect ankle pressure drop, as some patients may have leg symptoms on exercise, with a resting ABI≥0.91. A post-exercise ankle systolic blood pressure drop >30 mmHg or a post-exercise ABI decrease >20% should be considered for a PAD diagnosis [37]. In patients with medial calcification (e.g., in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease) ABI measurement may not be possible because the arteries cannot be compressed by the cuff. In these cases, toe brachial index can be used as alternative assessment (the usual pathological threshold is <0.70) [3].

Figure 2 Algorithm of chronic symptomatic patients with PAD with indication for exercise treatment. Notes. BMT: best medical treatment (including pharmacological and non-pharmacological [lifestyle changes and exercise] approach); DUS: duplex ultrasound; PAD: peripheral artery disease; SF-36: Short form health 36 questionnaire; SPPB: short physical performance battery; Vascu-QoL6: Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire-6; WIQ: Walking Impairment Questionnaire.

Walking distance assessment

Walking distance is considered an important clinical outcome for both patients and clinicians. Standardised exercise testing should be used for the assessment of functional impairment in patients with PAD (Figure 2).

Treadmill assessment

Treadmill testing should be performed with patients familiar with the treadmill and under reproducible conditions (i.e., avoiding exercise and alcohol prior to assessment). Patients should be asked to walk until maximum levels of pain, lightly holding or not holding onto the treadmill. If the tests are stopped for reasons other than leg pain, then this should be recorded. Patients are asked to indicate the claudication pain score they reached during walking, especially the point at which pain begins, and recovery based on a five-point scale (0, no pain; 1, onset of pain; 2, mild pain; 3, moderate pain; 4, severe or maximum pain) [38]. Common treadmill protocols include constant load (single stage) or graded exercise testing [39, 40]. The latter is performed at constant speed varying the slope of the treadmill. Established graded protocols include the Gardner/Skinner (3.2 km/hour and a 2% slope increase every two minutes) or the Hiatt protocol (3.2 km/hour and a 3.5% slope increase every three minutes). Constant load treadmill tests are performed at a fixed speed of 2–4 km/hour and fixed gradient of 10–12%. Constant load protocols have less good reliability both for pain free walking distance (PFWD) and maximum walking distance (MWD) compared with graded protocols (coefficient of variance 30% and 45%, respectively) [41, 42]. Treadmill tests have limitations including learning effect during repeated evaluations. Also, some patients are unable or are unwilling to perform a treadmill test, mainly due to balance impairment or limited walking abilities.

Six-minute walk test

The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is performed along a flat corridor with a length of 30 m with turning points marked by a cone. Patients are asked to walk at their own pace for the full duration and may stop and rest at any point in the test [43]. The total distance walked is measured and reported as the six-minute walking distance (6MWD) [43]. Any encouragement given or phrases used should be the same for every test performed to ensure test–retest reliability [43]. Further, there may be a learning effect so it is recommended that the best of two walks is recorded or the first test discounted [44]. Although treadmill-based exercise tests can establish maximum walking capacity, there may be a poor correlation between treadmill outcomes, normal walking, and self-reported walking distance [45]. On the other hand, compared with the treadmill test, the 6MWT has been shown to better represent daily life walking in patients with PAD [46]. The 6MWT is a well validated and low-cost test. It has good reliability, with a correlation coefficient of 0.90 (p < .001) and a coefficient of variation of 8.9% with testing performed one to two weeks apart [47]. Changes in the 6MWT can be used to predict mortality and mobility loss in patients with PAD [7, 48]. The minimum detectable changes (i.e., the statistical detectability of change beyond measurement error) in the 6MWT are represented by a change >46 m [49]. The minimum clinically important difference (i.e., the clinical relevance or importance of the observed change from the patient’s perspective) in the 6MWT in patients with PAD is represented by an improvement of eight [50] or nine metres [51] for small changes and 20 [50] or 38 m [51] for large changes.

Connected devices

A measure of real-life walking performance may be performed using global positioning systems (GPSs) or commercially available devices such as activity trackers, smart watches, and phones [52]. Research has shown that GPS recorders have good accuracy and reliability compared with known distances walked [53, 54], and measurement of step counts with mobile phones has been shown to be highly reliable even at low walking speeds [55]. Further, GPS recorded walking distances correlate well with treadmill walking distances [56]. Patients should be able to note the initial onset of claudication pain and the MWD either in total or between bouts of walking using the GPS system.

Muscle strength assessment

The presence of PAD is associated with impaired lower extremity muscle strength and function [57], which is associated with a high prevalence of frailty and sarcopenia [58]. Muscle strength and function should therefore be assessed before and after supervised exercise training (SET; Figure 2). There is heterogeneity in how muscle strength and function are assessed. Muscle isokinetic strength and endurance can be assessed by isokinetic dynamometry, which is a chair device that the patient sits on and the specific joint is tested in an appropriate position with the dynamometer attached to the limb. Patients push against the dynamometer as it provides resistance to maintain a set speed. Isokinetic dynamometry has demonstrated good reliability at the ankle (reliability coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.96) [59]. Testing can be done in various joints, including the ankle, knee, and hip, in various planes such as extension and flexion. As isokinetic dynamometry assessment includes specialised equipment, it may not be practical or convenient to assess patients using this device. As an alternative, the short physical performance battery that includes a 4 m walk test, a sit to stand chair test, and a standing balance test should be used [60]. A recent study showed that the sit to stand is a validated test to estimate muscle power in patients with symptomatic PAD [61]. Interestingly, muscle power assessed by the sit to stand test was related to overall functional performance prior to and following SET [61].

Self-reported functional impairment and quality of life assessment

To provide a complete assessment of the functional status of the patient, a subjective (self-reported) evaluation of walking abilities and health related quality of life (HRQoL) should be incorporated in addition to the objective assessment of functional impairment (Figure 2) [62, 63, 64] Following exercise interventions, HRQoL assessment is usually used to determine if an objective improvement in functional performance is also perceived by the patient in his or her daily life. Table I reports the most used subjective tools for walking ability and HRQoL assessment in patients with PAD. Trials used a wide variety of patient reported outcome measurement questionnaires [62, 63, 64]. The most used are the Short Form Health 36 (SF-36), a generic questionnaire including physical and mental items related to health, and the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a PAD specific questionnaire focusing on PAD and functional limitations. Studies have shown that HRQoL burden is greater in magnitude in patients with both PAD and CVD than in those with CVD alone [65]. In the PARTNERS study, the SF-36 Physical Component Summary of the combined PAD and CVD group was 46.3±1.2 compared with 55.5±1.1 in the CVD alone group [65]. Cross sectional studies show that in patients with PAD the degree of difficulty in walking distance and stair climbing are significantly related to HRQoL [66]. The European Society for Vascular Surgery VASCUNET and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries consensus statement recommended the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire 6 for the primary assessment of patient reported outcome measurements in patients with symptomatic PAD [62].

Table I Self-reported evaluation of walking ability and health related quality of life (QoL) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD)

Greater amounts of physical activity are associated with higher ratings of both perceived health and HRQoL, correlating with objective health outcomes and life expectancy [67]. One of the most important factors linked to both subjective and objective health, across both cognitive and physical domains, is physical activity [68].

Exercise therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease

Screening prior to exercise training participation

All patients should be medically screened before SET programme initiation (Figure 2). A complete medical history and examination is suggested [38]. Patients with contraindications to exercise training (Table II) should be excluded from SET until the relevant condition stabilises or is successfully treated. For patients with current or prior symptomatic cardiac disease (Table III), referral for cardiology work up is recommended, including an exercise test to assess for evidence of exercise induced coronary ischaemia, to identify whether additional treatment for cardiac disease is required before proceeding with SET. Comorbidities (such as neurological and orthopaedic diseases leading to gait abnormalities) should be documented and how they may limit SET programme participation should be considered. After SET programme initiation, patients should continue to be closely monitored for changes in health status (e.g., any symptom or situation which may suggest an undiagnosed or incident cardiac condition, ischaemic limb pain at rest, and toe or foot wounds) that might necessitate interruption of the programme, at least temporarily.

Table II Absolute contraindications to exercise training
Table III Conditions requiring cardiological screening before exercise training participation

Supervised exercise training

Supervised exercise training is considered among first line therapies for patients with chronic and symptomatic PAD (Figure 2) [3, 64, 69, 70]. Supervised exercise training is safe and is usually conducted in the hospital setting [71]. Over the past 60 years, many trials have reported the effectiveness of SET on walking distances in these patients [72, 73]. The most recent Cochrane meta-analysis showed that SET improves PFWD (82 m; 95% confidence interval [CI] 72–92) and MWD (120 m, 95% CI 51–190) [74]. Similar findings were observed in another meta-analysis (PFWD 128 m, 95% CI 92–165; MWD 180 m, 95% CI 130–238 [75]. Although less well investigated or usually reported as a secondary outcome, SET also improved functional status, gait pattern, self-reported walking ability, and quality of life [64, 74, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82]. It is interesting to note that cardiac rehabilitation programmes also increase walking distance, HRQoL, and physical activity in patients with symptomatic PAD, suggesting that types of rehabilitation other than SET may also be useful [83]. Finally, some vasoactive drugs such as cilostazol (phosphodiesterase type 3 inhibitor), pentoxifylline (xanthine derivative), bosentan, sildenafil, and others are claimed to increase walking capacity in patients with PAD [84, 85, 86, 87]. However, the objective documentation of their effect to draw extensive conclusions is very limited [84, 88]. More studies are needed to confirm the additive effect of drug therapies to supervised exercise.

Training modalities

There are different types of exercise training for patients with PAD, but the common aim is to improve walking capacity and reduce symptoms. In addition, exercise should aim to improve balance and muscle strength to promote independence and a reduced risk of falling in the long term [33]. Treadmill and overground walking are the most common and recommended training modalities in patients with IC (Figure 2) [64, 70]. However, due to severe exercise induced ischaemia, low pain tolerance, the risk of falling, and or other comorbidities, some patients are unwilling or unable to perform walking sessions. In addition to walking training there are several other forms of training that are used, although much less frequently, in the rehabilitation of patients with PAD. A recent meta-analysis reported that other non-walking training modes are also as effective as traditional walking training in improving walking performance, whereas there was no clear evidence for changes in quality of life following exercise interventions. However, the authors concluded that the certainty of this evidence was judged to be low [89]. Different training modes include strength training of large muscle groups [90, 91]. Cycling [92], pole striding [93, 94], multimodal training [76, 77, 95, 96, 97, 98], and training with an arm crank ergometer [99, 100]. The beneficial effect of these training modalities can usually be described as large and even reach those of typical walking training [101]. However, the PFWD and the MWD tend to be higher with walking training than with strength training when all studies are considered [89]. In contrast, the self-reported ability to climb stairs (assessed by the WIQ) is more improved following strength training (29.2% vs. 43.8% after six months) compared with walking training on the treadmill (39.6% vs. 43.8% after six months) [102]. Therefore, when walking is not an option, alternative training modalities might also be effective. These training modalities also elicit lower or no pain during exertion compared with walking, which might lead to higher compliance rates.

Training frequency

Based on a previous meta-analysis, and shared by most of the studies and guidelines, the training frequency associated with greater improvements in walking distance is at least three times per week [103, 104].

Training duration

Identifying an optimal training duration is difficult, mainly due to differences in training modalities, frequencies, and intensities among studies. Current guidelines have reported that the optimal training duration ranges between 12 and 24 weeks [64, 70, 103]. The optimal training session duration has not been widely investigated. Additionally, in most studies, the total session duration is usually reported without specifying the actual time spent exercising. The literature shows that exercise sessions lasting 30–60 minutes were the most effective for improving walking performance [103, 104].

Training intensity

In most studies, no clear distinction is made between symptom intensity (claudication pain scale) and exercise training intensity (based on HR, oxygen uptake [VO2], or RPE on Borg’s scale: 6, very very light; 20, maximum effort) to monitor the exercise therapy. The Borg scale is a subjective assessment tool used to measure an individual’s perceived exertion or effort during physical activity. The scale assigns a numerical rating ranging from 6 to 20 to indicate the intensity of exertion experienced by the person [105].

First, the majority of trials used claudication pain severity to provide guidance during the training sessions. In PAD research, the claudication pain scale, an ordinal scale from 0 (no pain) to 4 (severe or maximum pain), is the most commonly used tool. A distinction is made between walking training with and without muscle pain caused by ischaemia. With regard to claudication pain intensity, international guidelines are heterogeneous [38, 64, 70]. The UK NICE guideline encourages patients to exercise to the point of maximum pain, the American Heart Association guideline recommends moderate to moderate or severe claudication pain as tolerated [64], while an international consensus and the Australian guideline does not specify pain intensity for exercise dose [106]. Based on strong evidence [64, 73, 74, 75, 104], the current consensus is that patients should exercise to moderate to high claudication pain to improve walking performance. Also, one year home based walking training performed at high intensity pain has been found to be more effective than walking training performed at low intensity for improving walking and functional performance in patients with PAD [107, 108]. These findings indicate that claudication pain intensity may be a key factor for walking improvement in these individuals. In contrast, others have reported that improvements in walking performance may be obtained with less severe claudication pain during exertion [101]. According to recent findings, walking training with pain is not clearly superior to walking training without pain regarding changes in walking distance [109, 110, 111, 112]. It may be assumed that walking training with moderate, low, or no pain is associated with higher compliance and possibly long-term maintenance of training or change in activity behaviour [112]. This indicates that a more flexible approach to exercise prescription may be required, considering the patient’s needs and preferences, and what might achieve a high level of (long term) compliance. Larger studies with a higher number of cases and longer duration, taking compliance into account, are needed for a conclusive statement [113].

Second, the optimal no or low pain-based exercise training intensity is under studied in this population. Indeed, it is interesting to note that the claudication pain severity does not necessarily rely on common measures of exercise intensity [78, 114]. For example, when performing vigorous intensity exercise, some patients may experience moderate to severe claudication pain, whereas others, suffer low levels of claudication only. Assuming that exercise intensity is a determinant of the physiological response to training [115], monitoring claudication pain only is limiting and prevents accurate comparison of exercise effectiveness in patients with PAD. This may also explain the large variability in the magnitude of improvements following exercise interventions [64, 103]. Fassora et al. [78] recently reported that both training modality and exercise intensity should be considered when looking for the best results in walking performance and cardiorespiratory fitness. Notably, these results showed that walking at vigorous intensity (%HRpeak 77–95, %VO2peak 64–90, RPE≥14 [115]) induced the greatest improvement in MWD, while cycling and other non-walking modalities performed at vigorous intensity elicited the greatest improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness [78]. These findings suggest that both walking and cardiorespiratory capacities are desirable outcomes but that they need different exercise programmes [78]. However, it is important to note that training programmes should start with a lead in period performed at low to moderate exercise intensity and, if tolerated, gradually progress to vigorous exercise intensity. This approach may allow determination the patient’s exercise response and tolerance, thereby reducing the risk of complications.

The monitoring of exercise intensity during a resistance training programme is mediated by the percentage of the one repetition maximum (1RM) [116]. The determination of the 1RM plays a key role in the objective setting of an individualised resistance-based programme [116]. Compared with direct assessment of the 1RM, the multiple RM assessments (such as 10RM, the maximum weight a person can lift for 10 repetitions) is considered to be a safe and well tolerated approach to evaluate muscle strength for a given muscle group in patients with CVD [116]. Following the multiple RM test, different prediction equations are available to estimate the 1RM [117]. As also used in the cardiac rehabilitation, a target exercise intensity of 30–70% of 1RM for the upper body and 40–80% of 1RM for the lower body should be considered [117]. Exercise intensity should be progressively increased to determine the patient’s exercise response and exercise tolerance. It has been shown that resistance training improves walking performance and muscular strength in patients with PAD.118 Notably, high intensity (i.e., 80% 1RM) induces the best improvements in walking performance compared with low to moderate (i.e., < 50% 1RM) strength training intensity [90, 118].

Table IV summarises the main exercise prescription recommendations with some practical applications.

Table IV Training specificity and practical applications

Home based exercise training

Compared with patients not undergoing exercise training, a home-based training (HBT) strategy resulted in a non-significant increase of MWD in a recent meta-analysis (mean difference: 136 m; 95% CI −2–273 m; p=.050) [119]. When comparing HBT with basic exercise advice, no improvement of MWD was observed in patients following an HBT strategy (mean difference 39 m; 95% CI −123.1–201.1 m; p=.64) [119]. Regarding PFWD, HBT led to a greater increase than exercise advice (mean difference 64.5 m; 95% CI 14.1–114.8 m; p=.010) [119]. Compared with HBT, SET was more effective in improving MWD (mean difference 139 m; 95% CI 45–232 m; p=.004) and PFWD (mean difference 84 m; 95% CI 25–143 m; p=.005) [119].

Considering the effect of monitoring in HBT, no difference in the change of MWD and PFWD was observed between monitored HBT and SET (mean difference in MWD 8 m; 95% CI −81–97 m; p=.86; mean difference in PFWD 43 m; 95% CI −29–114 m; p=.24) [119]. The equality in training efficacy of monitored HBT and SET emphasises the role of monitoring in HBT programmes. Apart from regular on-site visits or phone calls, activity diaries or logbooks have been used for HBT monitoring [119]. Additional tools for self monitoring, such as wrist worn activity trackers with smartwatch like functions or smartphone accelerometer applications, have been assessed, however which modality is most appropriate still requires clarification [55].

The effect of training on the patient’s daily physical activity was assessed by several studies implementing pedometer and accelerometer measurements. A network meta-analysis demonstrated improvements of daily physical activity in HBT to a similar extent as was observed in patients undergoing SET [120].

Focusing on quality of life, most studies reported improvements in patients undergoing HBT [119]. Compared with SET, improvements of individual SF-36 measures (pain and social functioning) and WIQ measures (distance) were less pronounced in patients undergoing HBT [119]. In addition, HBT improves measures of self efficacy for walking, satisfaction with functioning, pain acceptance, and social functioning in patients with claudication [121]. Follow up data of patients who had undergone HBT suggest sustained improvements in measures of quality of life and functional and walking capacity after termination of the active training intervention [122, 123].

HBT safety was analysed in a systematic review including 27 studies, which reported a cardiac event rate of 1 per 49 270 and a non-cardiac event rate of 1 per 147 810 [124]. HBT event rates were lower than event rates reported for SET (HBT vs. SET: cardiac 1:49 270 vs. 1:13 788; non-cardiac: 1:147 810 vs. 1:41 363) [124]. Regarding the overall mortality rate, retrospective data suggest a reduction of long-term mortality in patients undergoing HBT [125]. Overall mortality rates do not differ between patients undergoing HBT and patients following a SET programme [126]. The results of the reported meta-analyses and reviews should be viewed with caution because of the moderate to low quality of evidence [119, 126, 127]. Due to the limited availability and utilisation of SET programmes, HBT programmes can be used as a valid alternative training modality for patients with IC [128, 129, 130, 131].

Data on sex specific differences in the efficacy of HBT are inconsistent [132, 133]. In females, the efficacy of HBT appears to be more strongly related to the individual training intensity than in males [134]. Regarding comorbidities, HBT seems to be less effective in diabetic patients with respect to the potential increase in walking capacity [135]. In elderly patients, HBT potentially improves quality of life to a similar extent as revascularisation [136]. Considering the frequency of HBT training, three weekly sessions were the most common training strategy (range three weekly sessions to daily sessions) [119]. For initiation, patients should start with a duration of 20 minutes per session, progressively increasing to 60 minutes per session. Home based training can be performed outside, around a track, or in a hallway at a self-selected pace [51, 137].

Long term compliance with exercise therapy

In clinical practice, long term compliance with therapy is a major problem. Participating in SET programmes may help patients to acquire awareness of the disease and learn the importance of exercise and how to practice it. Supervised exercise training programmes can be regarded as a transition phase to improve self management and may serve as a bridge for those patients that need it to other forms of exercise approach such as community or home-based exercise. Telemedical monitoring through step counting with pedometers or activity monitors proved to be effective [138, 139], as did supervised structured walking exercise to improve PFWD and MWD [119]. In addition to monitoring, factors such as education, self efficacy, goal setting, feedback, and a training plan were critical to successful outcomes [119]. This should be used more frequently in clinical practice to increase long term compliance but needs to be confirmed in long term studies.

Mechanisms of response to exercise in peripheral artery disease

Exercise represents a major challenge to whole body homeostasis provoking widespread perturbations in numerous cells, tissues, and organs that are caused by or are in response to the increased bio-energetic activity of the contracting skeletal musculature [140]. The exercise training induced increase in functional capacity and the concomitant amelioration of diverse maladaptive responses that ultimately reduce claudication symptoms in patients with PAD are underpinned by several interdependent physiological, metabolic, and mechanical mechanisms. After several months of exercise training, there is extensive remodelling of the vascular system, and although direct sampling of the vasculature in humans in vivo is limited, the trained musculature provides a valid proxy, being the primary tissue involved in training adaptation [140]. The dynamic biochemical and mechanical environment around blood vessels arising from the forces provoked during skeletal muscle contractile activity (i.e., shear stress and passive stretch) and signals stimulated by the increases in muscle energetic demand (i.e., increases in adenosine monophosphate (AMP) concentration and reduced oxygen delivery) activate several intracellular signalling pathways responsible for promoting a regulatory network governing the transcriptional control of mitochondrial biogenesis and respiratory function along with enhanced expression of pro-angiogenic factors [141] (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Dynamic exercise training induces extensive remodelling of the vascular system. Skeletal muscle contraction is associated with several physiological, metabolic, and mechanical mechanisms that when repeated over several weeks and months result in mitochondrial biogenesis, angiogenesis, and increases in the functional capacity of individuals with peripheral arterial disease. Notes. AMPK: AMP activated protein kinase; CRP: C reactive protein; ERRα: oestrogen related receptor alpha; HIF-1α: hypoxia inducible factor 1-alpha; IL-6: interleukin 6; NO: nitric oxide; PGC-1α: peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma coactivator-1α; PGI2: prostacyclin; ROS: reactive oxygen species; slCAM-1: soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1; sVCAM-1: circulating vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor.

Over time, this results in the initiation of capillary growth and proliferation in the number of arterioles. Such structural remodelling is driven by a complex and often redundant sequence of events that include NO and prostaglandins. Indeed, mechanical, neural, and humoral factors, including those released from contracting skeletal muscle, have all been implicated in the remodelling response, with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling pathway and downstream targets ultimately driving skeletal muscle capillary expansion.141 Muscle activity increases VEGF in the muscle interstitium and subsequently acts on the VEGF receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, on the capillary endothelium, activating multiple downstream pathways via signalling intermediates such as mitogen activated protein kinases and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase [142]. The time course of remodelling varies and is largely a function of the blood vessel size, and while many of these adaptations are restricted to the vascular beds of the trained muscles, improved endothelial function appears to be a whole-body response to exercise training, even in individuals with PAD.

VEGF expression is partially regulated by the hypoxia inducible factor-1α, but recently, the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma co-activator-1α (PGC-1α) has emerged as an important candidate in the exercise induced angiogenic response. PGC-1α regulates the coordinated expression of mitochondrial proteins encoded in the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes and is rapidly induced after exercise. This protein has been called the master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis and controls various aspects of muscle oxidative phenotype while transducing and integrating physiological signals governing metabolism, differentiation, and cell growth, and suppressing a broad inflammatory response [143]. Thus, the PGC-1 co-activators serve as a central component of the transcriptional regulatory circuitry that coordinates the energy generating functions of the mitochondria in accordance with the metabolic demands imposed by exercise training undertaken by patients with PAD.

Exercise and revascularisation

Current guidelines recommend SET programmes as an initial treatment modality for patients with IC [3, 144]. Revascularisation is recommended for patients with IC when they do not respond to initial exercise and medical therapies [145]. However, the role of revascularisation as an initial treatment option alone or as an upstream adjunct to SET in patients with IC remains controversial.

Several trials have compared endovascular therapies with or without SET vs. SET alone as an initial treatment strategy for patients with PAD with IC and have reported inconsistent results [146, 147, 148, 149].

The relevant aspect of exercise training may be reduction of the inflammatory process in patients with PAD. In a recent trial, reactive oxygen species formation was measured using the luminol analogue L-012 for patients with IC, randomised either to HBT alone or in addition to endovascular therapy (EVT) [150]. Follow up was performed after three months. ROS production after nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAPDH) oxidase 2 stimulation showed a significant reduction in both groups at follow up (EVT group, p=.002; exercise group, p=.019), with a higher relative ROS reduction in the EVT group than in the exercise group (p=.014).

The data regarding the benefit of SET alone or in combination with EVT or EVT alone are rare. A robust evaluation of existing data comes from a meta-analysis comparing the different treatment approaches [151]. A total of 987 patients from seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (constituting nine total comparison arms) with a median follow up duration of 12.4 months (range 10–18 months) were enrolled. Of these, 530 patients were randomised to EVT vs. SET alone and 457 patients to EVT plus SET vs. SET alone [151]. For the effect of EVT alone vs. SET alone (five comparison arms), a random effects model showed no significant difference in the MWD (standardised mean difference [SMD] -0.11 95% CI −0.59–0.36; p=.64) on follow up between the two groups, either for the PFWD, need for revascularisation, or amputation. On pooled analysis, the ABI was significantly higher among participants who underwent EVT alone compared with SET only (SMD 0.64; 95% CI 0.38–0.90, p < .001; weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.15; 95% CI 0.10–0.19, p < .001).

On pooled analysis using random effects models, EVT plus SET (four comparison arms) was associated with significantly higher MWD on follow up compared with SET alone (SMD 0.79; 95% CI 0.18–1.39, p=.010), as well as significantly higher ABI on follow up compared with SET only (SMD 0.62; 95% CI 0.33–0.91; WMD 0.14; 95% CI 0.10–0.17, p < .001).

The combination of EVT plus SET was also associated with a significantly lower risk of revascularisation or amputation on follow up (3.5% vs. 17.3%, odds ratio [OR] 0.19; 95% CI 0.09–0.40, p < .001). The corresponding number needed to treat was eight (95% CI 6–12). Pain free walking distance was reported in two studies with no difference between the two groups in random effects pooled analysis [151]. However, EVT alone is not associated with better outcomes than SET [151, 152]. Among patients with stable PAD and IC, compared with SET alone, endovascular revascularisation in combination with SET is associated with improved outcomes.

Exercise training after surgical revascularisation also improves outcomes compared with revascularisation without exercise training. Although much less investigated, few publications exist on the impact of exercise on outcome after surgical revascularisation of symptomatic PAD patients. One small RCT compared patients after bypass surgery (n=14) [153]. Group I had standard pre-operative and post-operative care, and the intervention group (Group II) had SET 4–10 weeks post-operatively. Maximum walking distance, mean increase in ABI, and improvement in WIQ were significantly better in Group II. In another recent study, patients who underwent above knee femoropopliteal bypass were divided into two groups: those who continued regular exercise after the bypass operation and those who discontinued exercise after surgery [154]. After propensity score matching, five-year primary and secondary patency (primary patency 97% vs. 61%, p=.004; secondary patency 100% vs. 69%, p=.002) and freedom from major adverse CV events (61% vs. 24%, p=.007) were significantly better in patients who continued exercise. One systematic review included all RCTs with either surgical or endovascular revascularisation to evaluate the evidence for the efficacy of lower limb revascularisation combined with SET in patients with PAD [155]. Eight trials with 726 patients showed that combined therapy led to greater improvements in PFWD and MWD compared with revascularisation or supervised training alone. In two of eight studies, revascularisation was surgical and in six studies it was endovascular.

Effect of exercise on health-related quality of life and cognitive function

Poor HRQoL is associated with a higher mortality rate in patients with PAD [156]. RCTs have shown that exercise training vs. usual medical care in patients with PAD improves not only the perceived walking distance and speed but also the functional status as measured by specific impairment questionnaires, such as the WIQ. Compared with controls, patients who complete any form of exercise training significantly improve their WIQ speed (mean difference 9.60; 95% CI 6.98–12.23, p≤.001), WIQ distance (mean difference 7.41; 95% CI 4.49 – 10.33, p≤.001), and WIQ stair climbing (mean difference 5.07; 95% CI 3.16–6.99, p≤.001) [80]. In addition, more general HRQoL evaluation scores (Short Form Physical Component Summary) also showed significant improvement following exercise therapy (mean difference 1.24; 95% CI 0.48–2.01) [80]. Most of the studies showed that three [157, 158, 159] or six to 12 months [94, 102, 160] of exercise training improves the patient’s perception of physical HRQoL, with lesser effects on mental HRQoL. However, in the current literature, findings are inconsistent [74, 80, 161] and other studies did not find the same effects [162, 163, 164]. It is interesting to note that the improvement in general HRQoL scores (as SF-36) was mainly predicted by physical functional markers, such as the distance covered during a 6MWT (6MWD) and history of stumbling [165]. These data indicate that greater improvements in physical function following exercise therapy are expected to have greater improvements in self-perceived HRQoL [165]. It has recently been showed that improvements in 6MWD following SET are predictive of augmentations in general HRQoL in patients with PAD [96]. Interestingly, changes in treadmill performance, which are less representative of functional walking [46], were not related to improvements in HRQoL [96].

Regular physical activity is also known to improve cognitive function and brain health across the lifespan [166]. Cross sectional and experimental studies show that greater amounts of physical activity are linked to better cognitive function in adults, with the best performances for exercise programmes that are structured, individualised, higher intensity, longer duration, and multicomponent [167]. These results support a dose dependent neuroprotective relationship between physical exercise and cognitive performance. Physical exercise interventions aimed at improving brain health through neuroprotective mechanisms show promise for preserving cognitive performance [167]. Scientific evidence based on a functional and neuro-imaging approach has demonstrated that this relationship could be mediated by improved brain integrity, including adaptations in cerebral blood flow, volume, and white matter integrity [168].

Patient education

All patients with PAD should be offered oral and written information about their disease so they can share decision making and understand what they can do to help manage their condition. The role of exercise should be clearly explained, and patients should be supported to exercise regularly (assuming no contraindications). The impact of patient education regarding exercise is probably dependent on several factors, including the specific information that is provided, the timing and mode of delivery, and the nature of any interventions that are delivered concomitantly (e.g., SET). Patient education in the form of brief exercise advice, when delivered in isolation, confers little benefit and results in minimal improvement in the individual’s walking distances [169]. Structured education programmes, on the other hand, may have greater potential to improve exercise behaviour and walking distances by building the knowledge and skills of patients to enable them to successfully self-manage their condition [170]. Key programme features include a structured evidence-based curriculum that includes content on the nature of the condition and the role of exercise, delivery by trained educators, and embedded quality assurance processes [170].

A systematic review by Abaraogu et al. [170] identified six studies (1087 participants) that had investigated the effects of structured education for patients with PAD and IC. The interventions varied widely, but all included education sessions, exercise prescription, and behaviour change techniques. Four trials reported improvements in walking ability in intervention vs. control comparisons [170]. Effects on physical activity and quality of life were mixed. Overall, the evidence was inconclusive and more rigorous trials are needed that include a clear and complete description of the education intervention. Participant feedback from three studies highlighted intervention features that may be important for improving physical activity, providing information about PAD, IC and exercise, providing encouragement and support with self monitoring, and having group interaction while allowing space for individual discussion [170].

Three other trials have tested exercise programmes that had an educational component in patients with PAD [171, 172, 173]. The GOALS trial [172] randomised 194 participants either to a group mediated cognitive behavioural intervention or an attention control group. The intervention consisted of group meetings with a facilitator once weekly for six months. Discussion topics included effective behaviour change methods, self monitoring, exercising in cold weather, managing leg pain during exercise, and overcoming other obstacles to exercise compliance. At the six month follow up, the intervention group achieved a 53.5 m greater increase in 6MWD compared with the control group. The HONOR trial [173] tested the efficacy of telephone coaching combined with a wearable activity monitor and showed no improvement in 6MWD at the nine month follow up. Finally, the MOSAIC trial explored the effect of a physiotherapist delivered motivational interview intervention in 190 patients with PAD and IC [171]. A statistically significant mean difference of 16.7 m in 6MWD was observed at the three month follow up compared with usual care control [171]. The contrasting results of these trials indicate that exercise programmes that include education are more likely to be successful if they include periodic visits to a medical centre to meet with a coach or include tailored behaviour change components.

Sex and exercise

The prevalence of PAD in women is similar to men at all ages [174, 175]. However, women are more likely to have asymptomatic PAD and less likely to report IC [176]. Decreased detection and subsequent intervention may then result in a higher proportion of women with severe disease and chronic limb threatening ischaemia. Further, women who undergo revascularisation tend to be older and have more severe PAD than men, and these factors can affect procedure outcomes adversely [177]. There are contradictory mortality rates for women with PAD [178, 179, 180]. Population studies suggest a trend towards higher mortality rates in women with lower ABI [179].

Exercise performance has been used to suggest that women decline faster in terms of functional ability once PAD is established. However, this difference may be due to the smaller muscle size of women’s calves [181]. McDermott et al. [182] showed that at four years follow up, women were more likely to become unable to walk for six minutes continuously than men, more likely to develop mobility disability, and had faster declines in walking speed, and the distance achieved in the 6MWT was less. However, these apparent sex differences in functional decline were attenuated after additional adjustment for baseline calf muscle area and so may be attributable to smaller baseline calf muscle area in women. Interestingly, poorer leg strength is associated with an increased mortality rate in men, but not in women, with PAD [181].

Data on the efficacy of exercise rehabilitation in women with PAD compared with men are scarce. What is known, however, is that women with IC seem to have a poorer response to exercise rehabilitation, and smaller changes in PFWD and MWD following three months of exercise than men (Δ280 m for men vs. Δ220 m for women; p=.040) [183]. This is particularly so in those with diabetes [132]. Reduced blood volume expansion and slower oxygen kinetics occur in the calf musculature during exercise in women with PAD with IC [184]. Further, recent data showed that this poor response to exercise in women with IC and diabetes was not related to where the intervention was performed, being impaired in both a supervised exercise class and a home exercise setting [132]. This poorer response to exercise was also demonstrated in the EXITPAD study, which showed that women with IC, independent of confounding factors including diabetes, benefit less from supervised exercise and have a significantly lower MWD after 12 months. The higher level of metabolic syndrome present in post-menopausal women compared with similarly aged men may contribute to this [183]. Conversely, it has recently been shown that multimodal SET (combining strengthening of lower limbs and Nordic walking) significantly improves walking performance (treadmill and over ground) in women and men, with no difference between groups [98, 185]. Although not significant, it is interesting to note that women had greater improvements than men [98].

The clinical implication is that women with IC may respond less well to current exercise interventions and either need a greater dose of exercise or another intervention separate or in combination with exercise, to obtain similar improvements in IC to that seen in men with exercise alone.

Situation in Europe

Despite of the large body of evidence highlighting benefits, SET is under used, and its availability and compliance are low [128, 129, 130, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192]. The rate of clinicians referring a patient for SET is very low [128]. The reasons and barriers for not participating in SET programmes are lack of facilities, feeling worse, costs, time, lack of motivation, and comorbidities [128, 130, 187].

The situation with SET in Europe varies from country to country. A recent European survey showed that supervised exercise programmes exist in Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK [193]. However, SET is reimbursed by health insurance only in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland [193]. In the UK, SET programmes are funded by the National Health Service. In contrast, SET is not reimbursed in Czech Republic and Italy, and it does not even exist for patients with PAD in Denmark, Greece, Ireland, Poland, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, or Ukraine [193]. Similarly, the structured home-based exercise programme is not routinely present in European countries [193].

Importantly, there is heterogeneity in the form of SET in most individual countries, with existence of individual programmes or practices in each hospital or community [193]. They differ in respect of frequency, length, and duration of training, type of exercise, as well as by supervising professional [193]. Mostly, SET is coordinated by an angiologist or vascular physician, but sessions are predominantly supervised by clinical exercise physiologists or physiotherapists. SET for patients with PAD is sometimes offered in cardiac rehabilitation centres. Training programme duration is mostly 12 weeks or less, with session duration 30–60 minutes. The most frequently used training modalities are a combination of walking and resistance training or walking training alone [193].

To standardise SET programmes and provision across Europe, the following steps are required: (1) more widespread availability of SET programmes and standardised outcomes to assess their effectiveness; (2) more defined harmonisation of SET characteristics (establish process of referral, supervision, coordination, selection of patients, and SET protocols); (3) health insurance reimbursement of costs; and (4) action to improve the public knowledge about the benefits of SET [193].

Gaps in evidence and further studies

Awareness and access to supervised exercise programmes should be a field for further studies. Additionally, there are still many areas of insufficient or inconsistent evidence in the treatment of claudication with exercise therapy. The optimal therapy in terms of duration of the single walking session or intensity of training is not known. There are few studies on the impact of no or low pain-based exercise, and the data on sex differences are inconsistent. The combination of walking exercise with non-walking training has not been established. Also, more evidence is needed to better understand the potential role of wearable monitoring during exercise interventions and to evaluate the efficacy of supportive interventions that can be used together with exercise therapy. For example, the effect of different hydration strategies used during exercise training needs more evidence. In a non-randomised study, Parodi et al. [194] reported a mean increase in treadmill walking from 100 to 535 m in 131 patients who were treated with hydration, defined as drinking at least 2000 mL of water during 24 hours for a period of six months and ingesting albumin and salt (3.5 g/day).

Moreover, data on the interference of exercise training, as well as of individual training modalities, with medical treatment in patients with IC are scarce: one historical RCT suggested an augmentation of the beneficial effect of exercise training by antiplatelet therapy [195]. Another more recent RCT suggested an additive effect of cilostazol in addition to exercise treatment on absolute claudication distance [196]. However, it needs to be taken into account that both studies had very small sample sizes. Therefore, larger prospective trials are needed to further elucidate the interaction between exercise training and medication in PAD.

Another area of future research should be exploration of the best modalities to transition patients from supervised exercise programmes to everyday life while maintaining the beneficial effects. Finally, more research is needed on how to measure success in exercise training in an accurate and reproducible way.

Electronic supplementary material

The electronic supplementary material (ESM) is available with the online version of the article at https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001112

The authors would like to thank Vinko Boc (Department of Vascular Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia); Tristan Mirault (Université Paris Cité, Inserm, PARCC, F-75015, Paris, France; Service de médecine vasculaire, Hopital Européen G. Pompidou, Paris, France); Frederico Bastos Gonçalves (Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal); and Christian-Alexander Behrendt (Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Asklepios Clinic Wandsbek, Asklepios Medical School, Hamburg, Germany).

References

  • 1 Pelliccia A, Sharma S, Gati S, Back M, Borjesson M, Caselli S, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17–96. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 2 Song P, Rudan D, Zhu Y, Fowkes FJI, Rahimi K, Fowkes FGR, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2015: an updated systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:e1020–30. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 3 Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, Bjorck M, Brodmann M, Cohnert T, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries. Endorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO) The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:763–816. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 4 Frank U, Nikol S, Belch J, Boc V, Brodmann M, Carpentier PH, et al. ESVM guideline on peripheral arterial disease. Vasa. 2019;48:1–79. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • 5 McDermott MM. Lower extremity manifestations of peripheral artery disease: the pathophysiologic and functional implications of leg ischemia. Circ Res. 2015;116:1540–50. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 6 McDermott MM, Greenland P, Liu K, Guralnik JM, Celic L, Criqui MH, et al. The ankle brachial index is associated with leg function and physical activity: the Walking and Leg Circulation Study. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:873–83. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 7 McDermott MM, Liu K, Ferrucci L, Tian L, Guralnik JM, Liao Y, et al. Decline in functional performance predicts later increased mobility loss and mortality in peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:962–70. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 8 Weitz JI, Byrne J, Clagett GP, Farkouh ME, Porter JM, Sackett DL, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic arterial insufficiency of the lower extremities: a critical review. Circulation. 1996;94:3026–49. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 9 Rose GA. The diagnosis of ischaemic heart pain and intermittent claudication in field surveys. Bull World Health Organ. 1962;27:645–58. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 10 McDermott MM, Mehta S, Greenland P. Exertional leg symptoms other than intermittent claudication are common in peripheral arterial disease. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:387–92. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 11 Hiatt WR, Armstrong EJ, Larson CJ, Brass EP. Pathogenesis of the limb manifestations and exercise limitations in peripheral artery disease. Circ Res. 2015;116:1527–39. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 12 Seretny M, Colvin LA. Pain management in patients with vascular disease. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:ii95–ii106. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 13 Tew GA, Ouedraogo N, Nicolas G, Leftheriotis G, Copeland RJ, Abraham P. Impaired somatosensation in patients with isolated proximal-without-distal exercise-related lower-limb ischemia. Clin J Pain. 2012;28:404–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 14 Hammad TA, Strefling JA, Zellers PR, Reed GW, Venkatachalam S, Lowry AM, et al. The effect of post-exercise ankle-brachial index on lower extremity revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1238–44. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 15 McDermott MM, Dayanidhi S, Kosmac K, Saini S, Slysz J, Leeuwenburgh C, et al. Walking exercise therapy effects on lower extremity skeletal muscle in peripheral artery disease. Circ Res. 2021;128:1851–67. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 16 Sheikh MA, Bhatt DL, Li J, Lin S, Bartholomew JR. Usefulness of postexercise ankle-brachial index to predict all-cause mortality. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:778–82. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 17 Flammer AJ, Anderson T, Celermajer DS, Creager MA, Deanfield J, Ganz P, et al. The assessment of endothelial function: from research into clinical practice. Circulation. 2012;126:753–67. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 18 Gokce N, Vita JA, Bader DS, Sherman DL, Hunter LM, Holbrook M, et al. Effect of exercise on upper and lower extremity endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:124–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 19 Meredith IT, Currie KE, Anderson TJ, Roddy MA, Ganz P, Creager MA. Postischemic vasodilation in human forearm is dependent on endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Am J Physiol. 1996;270:H1435–40. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 20 Vita JA, Hamburg NM. Does endothelial dysfunction contribute to the clinical status of patients with peripheral arterial disease? Can J Cardiol. 2010;26:45A–50A. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 21 Robbins JL, Jones WS, Duscha BD, Allen JD, Kraus WE, Regensteiner JG, et al. Relationship between leg muscle capillary density and peak hyperemic blood flow with endurance capacity in peripheral artery disease. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;111:81–6. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 22 Beckman JA, Preis O, Ridker PM, Gerhard-Herman M. Comparison of usefulness of inflammatory markers in patients with versus without peripheral arterial disease in predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes (myocardial infarction, stroke, and death). Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:1374–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 23 Tzoulaki I, Murray GD, Lee AJ, Rumley A, Lowe GD, Fowkes FG. C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and soluble adhesion molecules as predictors of progressive peripheral atherosclerosis in the general population: Edinburgh Artery Study. Circulation. 2005;112:976–83. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 24 Vidula H, Tian L, Liu K, Criqui MH, Ferrucci L, Pearce WH, et al. Biomarkers of inflammation and thrombosis as predictors of near-term mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:85–93. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 25 McDermott MM, Ferrucci L, Liu K, Guralnik JM, Tian L, Liao Y, et al. Leg symptom categories and rates of mobility decline in peripheral arterial disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:1256–62. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 26 Gardner AW, Forrester L, Smith GV. Altered gait profile in subjects with peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Med. 2001;6:31–4. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 27 Gommans LNM, Smid AT, Scheltinga MRM, Cancrinus E, Brooijmans FAM, Meijer K, et al. Prolonged stance phase during walking in intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:515–22. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 28 McDermott MM, Liu K, Greenland P, Guralnik JM, Criqui MH, Chan C, et al. Functional decline in peripheral arterial disease: associations with the ankle brachial index and leg symptoms. JAMA. 2004;292:453–61. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 29 Gardner AW, Montgomery PS, Ritti-Dias RM, Forrester L. The effect of claudication pain on temporal and spatial gait measures during self-paced ambulation. Vasc Med. 2010;15:21–6. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 30 Koutakis P, Johanning JM, Haynatzki GR, Myers SA, Stergiou N, Longo GM, et al. Abnormal joint powers before and after the onset of claudication symptoms. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:340–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 31 Koutakis P, Pipinos II, Myers SA, Stergiou N, Lynch TG, Johanning JM. Joint torques and powers are reduced during ambulation for both limbs in patients with unilateral claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:80–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 32 Schieber MN, Hasenkamp RM, Pipinos II, Johanning JM, Stergiou N, DeSpiegelaere HK, et al. Muscle strength and control characteristics are altered by peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:178–86. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 33 Gardner AW, Montgomery PS. Impaired balance and higher prevalence of falls in subjects with intermittent claudication. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M454–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 34 Gohil RA, Mockford KA, Mazari F, Khan J, Vanicek N, Chetter IC, et al. Balance impairment, physical ability, and its link with disease severity in patients with intermittent claudication. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013;27:68–74. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 35 Chaudru S, Jehannin P, de Mullenheim PY, Klein H, Jaquinandi V, Mahe G, et al. Using wearable monitors to assess daily walking limitations induced by ischemic pain in peripheral artery disease. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29:1813–26. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 36 McDermott MM, Guralnik JM, Tian L, Liu K, Ferrucci L, Liao Y, et al. Associations of borderline and low normal ankle-brachial index values with functional decline at 5-year follow-up: the WALCS (Walking and Leg Circulation Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1056–62. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 37 Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, Allison MA, Creager MA, Diehm C, et al. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126:2890–909. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 38 Treat-Jacobson D, McDermott MM, Beckman JA, Burt MA, Creager MA, Ehrman JK, et al. Implementation of supervised exercise therapy for patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;140:e700–10. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 39 Gardner AW, Skinner JS, Cantwell BW, Smith LK. Progressive vs single-stage treadmill tests for evaluation of claudication. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:402–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 40 Hiatt WR, Hirsch AT, Regensteiner JG, Brass EP. Clinical trials for claudication. Assessment of exercise performance, functional status, and clinical end points. Vascular Clinical Trialists. Circulation. 1995;92:614–21. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 41 Hiatt WR, Rogers RK, Brass EP. The treadmill is a better functional test than the 6-minute walk test in therapeutic trials of patients with peripheral artery disease. Circulation. 2014;130:69–78. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 42 Nicolai SP, Viechtbauer W, Kruidenier LM, Candel MJ, Prins MH, Teijink JA. Reliability of treadmill testing in peripheral arterial disease: a meta-regression analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:322–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 43 ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:111–7. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • 44 Chandra D, Kulkarni HS, Sciurba F. Learning from the learning effect in the six-minute-walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:684. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 45 Tew G, Copeland R, Le Faucheur A, Gernigon M, Nawaz S, Abraham P. Feasibility and validity of self-reported walking capacity in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:1227–34. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 46 McDermott MM, Guralnik JM, Criqui MH, Liu K, Kibbe MR, Ferrucci L. Six-minute walk is a better outcome measure than treadmill walking tests in therapeutic trials of patients with peripheral artery disease. Circulation. 2014;130:61–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 47 McDermott MM, Ades PA, Dyer A, Guralnik JM, Kibbe M, Criqui MH. Corridor-based functional performance measures correlate better with physical activity during daily life than treadmill measures in persons with peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1231–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 48 McDermott MM, Guralnik JM, Tian L, Ferrucci L, Liu K, Liao Y, et al. Baseline functional performance predicts the rate of mobility loss in persons with peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:974–82. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 49 Sandberg A, Cider A, Jivegard L, Nordanstig J, Wittboldt S, Back M. Test-retest reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change in the 6-minute walk test in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71:197–203. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 50 McDermott MM, Tian L, Criqui MH, Ferrucci L, Conte MS, Zhao L, et al. Meaningful change in 6-minute walk in people with peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73:267–76. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 51 Gardner AW, Montgomery PS, Wang M. Minimal clinically important differences in treadmill, 6-minute walk, and patient-based outcomes following supervised and home-based exercise in peripheral artery disease. Vasc Med. 2018;23:349–57. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 52 de Mullenheim PY, Chaudru S, Mahe G, Prioux J, Le Faucheur A. Clinical interest of ambulatory assessment of physical activity and walking capacity in peripheral artery disease. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26:716–30. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 53 Abraham P, Noury-Desvaux B, Gernigon M, Mahe G, Sauvaget T, Leftheriotis G, et al. The inter- and intra-unit variability of a low-cost GPS data logger/receiver to study human outdoor walking in view of health and clinical studies. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31338. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 54 Taoum A, Chaudru S, DE Müllenheim PY, Congnard F, Emily M, Noury-Desvaux B, et al. Comparison of activity monitors accuracy in assessing intermittent outdoor walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53:1303–14. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 55 Hochsmann C, Knaier R, Eymann J, Hintermann J, Infanger D, Schmidt-Trucksass A. Validity of activity trackers, smartphones, and phone applications to measure steps in various walking conditions. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28:1818–27. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 56 Le Faucheur A, Abraham P, Jaquinandi V, Bouye P, Saumet JL, Noury-Desvaux B. Measurement of walking distance and speed in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a novel method using a global positioning system. Circulation. 2008;117:897–904. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 57 McDermott MM, Tian L, Ferrucci L, Liu K, Guralnik JM, Liao Y, et al. Associations between lower extremity ischemia, upper and lower extremity strength, and functional impairment with peripheral arterial disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:724–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 58 Pizzimenti M, Meyer A, Charles AL, Giannini M, Chakfe N, Lejay A, et al. Sarcopenia and peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11:866–86. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 59 Ritti-Dias RM, Basyches M, Camara L, Puech-Leao P, Battistella L, Wolosker N. Test-retest reliability of isokinetic strength and endurance tests in patients with intermittent claudication. Vasc Med. 2010;15:275–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 60 Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M85–94. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 61 Lanzi S, Pousaz A, Calanca L, Mazzolai L. Sit to stand muscle power is related to functional performance at baseline and after supervised exercise training in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023;65:521–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 62 Arndt H, Nordanstig J, Bertges DJ, Budtz-Lilly J, Venermo M, Espada CL, et al. A Delphi consensus on patient reported outcomes for registries and trials including patients with intermittent claudication: recommendations and reporting standard. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;64:526–33. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 63 Raja A, Spertus J, Yeh RW, Secemsky EA. Assessing health-related quality of life among patients with peripheral artery disease: a review of the literature and focus on patient-reported outcome measures. Vasc Med. 2021;26:317–25. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 64 Treat-Jacobson D, McDermott MM, Bronas UG, Campia U, Collins TC, Criqui MH, et al. Optimal exercise programs for patients with peripheral artery disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e10–33. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 65 Regensteiner JG, Hiatt WR, Coll JR, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, McDermott MM, et al. The impact of peripheral arterial disease on health-related quality of life in the Peripheral Arterial Disease Awareness, Risk, and Treatment: New Resources for Survival (PARTNERS) program. Vasc Med. 2008;13:15–24. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 66 Kim M, Kim Y, Ryu GW, Choi M. Functional status and health-related quality of life in patients with peripheral artery disease: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:10941. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 67 Franco OH, de Laet C, Peeters A, Jonker J, Mackenbach J, Nusselder W. Effects of physical activity on life expectancy with cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2355–60. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 68 Dostalova R, Stillman C, Erickson KI, Slepicka P, Mudrak J. The relationship between physical activity, self-perceived health, and cognitive function in older adults. Brain Sci. 2021;11:492. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 69 Frank U, Nikol S, Belch J. 5 Conservative treatment for PAD—risk factor management. Vasa. 2019;48:1–12. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • 70 Harwood A, Pymer S, Ingle L, Doherty P, Chetter I, Parmenter B, et al. Exercise training for intermittent claudication: a narrative review and summary of guidelines for practitioners. BMJ Open Sport Exercise Med. 2020;6:e000897. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 71 Gommans LN, Fokkenrood HJ, van Dalen HC, Scheltinga MR, Teijink JA, Peters RJ. Safety of supervised exercise therapy in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:512–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 72 Bronas UG, Regensteiner JG. Connecting the past to the present: a historical review of exercise training for peripheral artery disease. Vasc Med. 2022;27:174–85. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 73 Penin-Grandes S, Lopez-Ortiz S, Maroto-Izquierdo S, Menendez H, Pinto-Fraga J, Martin-Hernandez J, et al. Winners do what they fear: exercise and peripheral arterial disease-an umbrella review. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023:zwad261. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • 74 Lane R, Harwood A, Watson L, Leng GC. Exercise for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;12:CD000990. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 75 Fakhry F, van de Luijtgaarden KM, Bax L, den Hoed PT, Hunink MG, Rouwet EV, et al. Supervised walking therapy in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:1132–42. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 76 Lanzi S, Boichat J, Calanca L, Aubertin P, Malatesta D, Mazzolai L. Gait changes after supervised exercise training in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Vasc Med. 2021;26:259–66. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 77 Lanzi S, Boichat J, Calanca L, Mazzolai L, Malatesta D. Supervised exercise training improves 6 min walking distance and modifies gait pattern during pain-free walking condition in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21:7989. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 78 Fassora M, Calanca L, Jaques C, Mazzolai L, Kayser B, Lanzi S. Intensity-dependent effects of exercise therapy on walking performance and aerobic fitness in symptomatic patients with lower-extremity peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vasc Med. 2022;27:158–70. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 79 Lanzi S, Pousaz A, Calanca L, Mazzolai L. Time-course evolution of functional performance during a 3-month supervised exercise training program in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. Vasc Med. 2023;28:404–11. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 80 Parmenter BJ, Dieberg G, Phipps G, Smart NA. Exercise training for health-related quality of life in peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vasc Med. 2015;20:30–40. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 81 Parmenter BJ, Dieberg G, Smart NA. Exercise training for management of peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015;45:231–44. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 82 Schieber MN, Pipinos II, Johanning JM, Casale GP, Williams MA, DeSpiegelaere HK, et al. Supervised walking exercise therapy improves gait biomechanics in patients with peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2019;71:575–83. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 83 Siercke M, Jorgensen LP, Missel M, Thygesen LC, Moller SP, Sillesen H, et al. Cardiovascular rehabilitation increases walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication. Results of the CIPIC Rehab Study: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;62:768–76. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 84 Brown T, Forster RB, Cleanthis M, Mikhailidis DP, Stansby G, Stewart M. Cilostazol for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;6:CD003748. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 85 De Haro J, Bleda S, Varela C, Esparza L, Acin F, Bosentan Population-Based Randomized Trial for Clinical and Endothelial Function Assessment on Endothelin Antagonist Therapy in Patients With Intermittent Claudication CLAU Investigators. Effect of bosentan on claudication distance and endothelium-dependent vasodilation in Hispanic patients with peripheral arterial disease. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:295–301. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 86 Omarjee L, Le Pabic E, Custaud MA, Fontaine C, Locher C, Renault A, et al. Effects of sildenafil on maximum walking time in patients with arterial claudication: the ARTERIOFIL study. Vascul Pharmacol. 2019;118–119:106563. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 87 Suzuki J, Shimamura M, Suda H, Wakayama K, Kumagai H, Ikeda Y, et al. Current therapies and investigational drugs for peripheral arterial disease. Hypertens Res. 2016;39:183–91. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 88 Broderick C, Forster R, Abdel-Hadi M, Salhiyyah K. Pentoxifylline for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10:CD005262. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 89 Jansen SC, Abaraogu UO, Lauret GJ, Fakhry F, Fokkenrood HJ, Teijink JA. Modes of exercise training for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;8:CD009638. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 90 Parmenter BJ, Raymond J, Dinnen P, Lusby RJ, Fiatarone Singh MA. High-intensity progressive resistance training improves flat-ground walking in older adults with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:1964–70. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 91 Ritti-Dias RM, Wolosker N, de Moraes Forjaz CL, Carvalho CR, Cucato GG, Leao PP, et al. Strength training increases walking tolerance in intermittent claudication patients: randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:89–95. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 92 Sanderson B, Askew C, Stewart I, Walker P, Gibbs H, Green S. Short-term effects of cycle and treadmill training on exercise tolerance in peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:119–27. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 93 Collins EG, Edwin Langbein W, Orebaugh C, Bammert C, Hanson K, Reda D, et al. Polestriding exercise and vitamin E for management of peripheral vascular disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:384–93. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 94 Collins EG, Langbein WE, Orebaugh C, Bammert C, Hanson K, Reda D, et al. Cardiovascular training effect associated with polestriding exercise in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005;20:177–85. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 95 Calanca L, Lanzi S, Ney B, Berchtold A, Mazzolai L. Multimodal supervised exercise significantly improves walking performances without changing hemodynamic parameters in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2020;54:605–11. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 96 Lanzi S, Calanca L, Berchtold A, Mazzolai L. Improvement in 6-minute walking distance after supervised exercise training is related to changes in quality of life in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3330. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 97 Lanzi S, Calanca L, Borgeat Kaeser A, Mazzolai L. Walking performances and muscle oxygen desaturation are increased after supervised exercise training in Takayasu arteritis: a case report and a review of the literature. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2018;2:yty123. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 98 Ney B, Lanzi S, Calanca L, Mazzolai L. Multimodal supervised exercise training is effective in improving long term walking performance in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2057. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 99 Tew G, Nawaz S, Zwierska I, Saxton JM. Limb-specific and cross-transfer effects of arm-crank exercise training in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Clin Sci (Lond). 2009;117:405–13. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 100 Treat-Jacobson D, Bronas UG, Leon AS. Efficacy of arm-ergometry versus treadmill exercise training to improve walking distance in patients with claudication. Vasc Med. 2009;14:203–13. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 101 Parmenter BJ, Raymond J, Dinnen P, Singh MA. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials: walking versus alternative exercise prescription as treatment for intermittent claudication. Atherosclerosis. 2011;218:1–12. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 102 McDermott MM, Ades P, Guralnik JM, Dyer A, Ferrucci L, Liu K, et al. Treadmill exercise and resistance training in patients with peripheral arterial disease with and without intermittent claudication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301:165–74. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 103 Bulmer AC, Coombes JS. Optimising exercise training in peripheral arterial disease. Sports Med. 2004;34:983–1003. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 104 Gardner AW, Poehlman ET. Exercise rehabilitation programs for the treatment of claudication pain. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995;274:975–80. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 105 Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14:377–81. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 106 Au TB, Golledge J, Walker PJ, Haigh K, Nelson M. Peripheral arterial disease—diagnosis and management in general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2013;42:397–400. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 107 Hammond MM, Spring B, Rejeski WJ, Sufit R, Criqui MH, Tian L, et al. Effects of walking exercise at a pace with versus without ischemic leg symptoms on functional performance measures in people with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: the LITE randomized clinical trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e025063. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 108 McDermott MM, Spring B, Tian L, Treat-Jacobson D, Ferrucci L, Lloyd-Jones D, et al. Effect of low-intensity vs high-intensity home-based walking exercise on walk distance in patients with peripheral artery disease: the LITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325:1266–76. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 109 Mika P, Konik A, Januszek R, Petriczek T, Mika A, Nowobilski R, et al. Comparison of two treadmill training programs on walking ability and endothelial function in intermittent claudication. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:838–42. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 110 Novakovic M, Krevel B, Rajkovic U, Vizintin Cuderman T, Jansa Trontelj K, Fras Z, et al. Moderate-pain versus pain-free exercise, walking capacity, and cardiovascular health in patients with peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:148–56. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 111 Perks J, Zaccardi F, Paterson C, Houghton JSM, Nickinson ATO, Pepper CJ, et al. Effect of high-pain versus low-pain structured exercise on walking ability in people with intermittent claudication: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2022;109:686–94. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 112 Seed SA, Harwood AE, Sinclair J, Pymer S, Caldow E, Ingle L, et al. A systematic review of exercise prescription in patients with intermittent claudication: does pain matter? Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;77:315–23. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 113 Birkett ST, Sinclair J, Seed SA, Pymer S, Caldow E, Ingle L, et al. Effects of exercise prescribed at different levels of claudication pain on walking performance in patients with intermittent claudication: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;16:17539447221108817. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 114 Lanzi S, Mazzolai L. Commentary to Seed, et al. What is the correct level of claudication pain to prescribe? Universal inconsistency within guidelines, a painful issue. Vascular. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381231160931. [Epub 5 April 2023]. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 115 Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334–59. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 116 Hansen D, Abreu A, Ambrosetti M, Cornelissen V, Gevaert A, Kemps H, et al. Exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation and beyond: why and how: a position statement from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29:230–45. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 117 Wood TM, Maddalozzo GF, Harter RA. Accuracy of seven equations for predicting 1-RM performance of apparently healthy, sedentary older adults. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2002;6:67–94. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 118 Parmenter BJ, Mavros Y, Ritti Dias R, King S, Fiatarone Singh M. Resistance training as a treatment for older persons with peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2019;54:452–61. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 119 Pymer S, Ibeggazene S, Palmer J, Tew GA, Ingle L, Smith GE, et al. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of home-based exercise programs for individuals with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74:2076–85. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 120 van den Houten MML, Hageman D, Gommans LNM, Kleijnen J, Scheltinga MRM, Teijink JAW. The effect of supervised exercise, home based exercise and endovascular revascularisation on physical activity in patients with intermittent claudication: a network meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58:383–92. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 121 Rejeski WJ, Spring B, Domanchuk K, Tao H, Tian L, Zhao L, et al. A group-mediated, home-based physical activity intervention for patients with peripheral artery disease: effects on social and psychological function. J Transl Med. 2014;12:29. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 122 Fakhry F, Spronk S, de Ridder M, den Hoed PT, Hunink MG. Long-term effects of structured home-based exercise program on functional capacity and quality of life in patients with intermittent claudication. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1066–73. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 123 McDermott MM, Guralnik JM, Criqui MH, Ferrucci L, Zhao L, Liu K, et al. Home-based walking exercise in peripheral artery disease: 12-month follow-up of the GOALS randomized trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000711. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 124 Waddell A, Seed S, Broom DR, McGregor G, Birkett ST, Harwood AE. Safety of home-based exercise for people with intermittent claudication: a systematic review. Vasc Med. 2022;27:186–92. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 125 Lamberti N, Lopez-Soto PJ, Guerzoni F, Napoli N, Gasbarro V, Zamboni P, et al. Changes in exercise capacity and risk of all-cause mortality in patients with peripheral artery disease: a 10-year retrospective cohort study. Intern Emerg Med. 2020;15:289–98. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 126 Hageman D, Fokkenrood HJ, Gommans LN, van den Houten MM, Teijink JA. Supervised exercise therapy versus home-based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;4:CD005263. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 127 Al-Jundi W, Madbak K, Beard JD, Nawaz S, Tew GA. Systematic review of home-based exercise programmes for individuals with intermittent claudication. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46:690–706. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 128 Dua A, Gologorsky R, Savage D, Rens N, Gandhi N, Brooke B, et al. National assessment of availability, awareness, and utilization of supervised exercise therapy for peripheral artery disease patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71:1702–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 129 Haque A. Few UK vascular centres offer a fully NICE-compliant supervised exercise programme: a national audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022;104:130–7. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 130 Harwood AE, Pymer S, Ibeggazene S, Ingle L, Caldow E, Birkett ST. Provision of exercise services in patients with peripheral artery disease in the United Kingdom. Vascular. 2022;30:874–81. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 131 Makris GC, Lattimer CR, Lavida A, Geroulakos G. Availability of supervised exercise programs and the role of structured home-based exercise in peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:569–75.; discussion 76. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 132 Gardner AW, Parker DE, Montgomery PS, Blevins SM. Diabetic women are poor responders to exercise rehabilitation in the treatment of claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:1036–43. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 133 Manfredini R, Lamberti N, Manfredini F, Straudi S, Fabbian F, Rodriguez Borrego MA, et al. Gender differences in outcomes following a pain-free, home-based exercise program for claudication. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019;28:1313–21. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 134 Gardner AW, Parker DE, Montgomery PS. Sex-specific predictors of improved walking with step-monitored, home-based exercise in peripheral artery disease. Vasc Med. 2015;20:424–31. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 135 Collins TC, Lunos S, Carlson T, Henderson K, Lightbourne M, Nelson B, et al. Effects of a home-based walking intervention on mobility and quality of life in people with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2174–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 136 Lamberti N, Malagoni AM, Ficarra V, Basaglia N, Manfredini R, Zamboni P, et al. Structured home-based exercise versus invasive treatment: a mission impossible? A pilot randomized study in elderly patients with intermittent claudication. Angiology. 2016;67:772–80. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 137 McDermott MM, Polonsky TS. Home-based exercise: a therapeutic option for peripheral artery disease. Circulation. 2016;134:1127–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 138 Chan C, Sounderajah V, Normahani P, Acharya A, Markar SR, Darzi A, et al. Wearable activity monitors in home based exercise therapy for patients with intermittent claudication: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61:676–87. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 139 Kim M, Kim C, Kim E, Choi M. Effectiveness of mobile health-based exercise interventions for patients with peripheral artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9:e24080. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 140 Hawley JA, Hargreaves M, Joyner MJ, Zierath JR. Integrative biology of exercise. Cell. 2014;159:738–49. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 141 Hoier B, Hellsten Y. Exercise-induced capillary growth in human skeletal muscle and the dynamics of VEGF. Microcirculation. 2014;21:301–14. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 142 Egginton S. Invited review: activity-induced angiogenesis. Pflugers Arch. 2009;457:963–77. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 143 Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. The role of exercise and PGC1alpha in inflammation and chronic disease. Nature. 2008;454:463–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 144 Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1465–508. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 145 Heiss C, Olinic DM, Belch JJF, Brodmann M, Mazzolai L, Stanek A, et al. Management of chronic peripheral artery disease patients with indication for endovascular revascularization. Vasa. 2022;51:121–37. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • 146 Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH, et al. Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127:1425–43. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 147 Koelemay MJW, van Reijen NS, van Dieren S, Frans FA, Vermeulen EJG, Buscher H, et al. Editor’s Choice – Randomised clinical trial of supervised exercise therapy vs. endovascular revascularisation for intermittent claudication caused by iliac artery obstruction: the SUPER study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;63:421–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 148 Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, Regensteiner JG, Mohler ER, Cohen DJ, Reynolds MR, et al. Supervised exercise versus primary stenting for claudication resulting from aortoiliac peripheral artery disease: six-month outcomes from the Claudication: Exercise versus Endoluminal Revascularization (CLEVER) study. Circulationz. 2012;125:130–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 149 Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, Regensteiner JG, Mohler ER III, Cohen DJ, Reynolds MR, et al. Supervised exercise, stent revascularization, or medical therapy for claudication due to aortoiliac peripheral artery disease: the CLEVER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:999–1009. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 150 Koppe-Schmeisser F, Schwaderlapp M, Schmeisser J, Dopheide JF, Munzel T, Daiber A, et al. Influence of peripheral transluminal angioplasty alongside exercise training on oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5851. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 151 Pandey A, Banerjee S, Ngo C, Mody P, Marso SP, Brilakis ES, et al. Comparative efficacy of endovascular revascularization versus supervised exercise training in patients with intermittent claudication: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:712–24. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 152 Fakhry F, Fokkenrood HJ, Spronk S, Teijink JA, Rouwet EV, Hunink MGM. Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3:CD010512. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 153 Badger SA, Soong CV, O'Donnell ME, Boreham CA, McGuigan KE. Benefits of a supervised exercise program after lower limb bypass surgery. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2007;41:27–32. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 154 Kobayashi T, Hamamoto M, Okazaki T, Honma T, Iba K, Takakuwa T, et al. Effectiveness of continuous unsupervised exercise therapy after above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Vascular. 2021;29:387–95. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 155 Meneses AL, Ritti-Dias RM, Parmenter B, Golledge J, Askew CD. Combined lower limb revascularisation and supervised exercise training for patients with peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med 2017;47:987–1002. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 156 Issa SM, Hoeks SE, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Van Gestel YR, Lenzen MJ, Verhagen HJ, et al. Health-related quality of life predicts long-term survival in patients with peripheral artery disease. Vasc Med. 2010;15:163–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 157 Gardner AW, Parker DE, Montgomery PS, Scott KJ, Blevins SM. Efficacy of quantified home-based exercise and supervised exercise in patients with intermittent claudication: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2011;123:491–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 158 Patterson RB, Pinto B, Marcus B, Colucci A, Braun T, Roberts M. Value of a supervised exercise program for the therapy of arterial claudication. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:312–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 159 Tsai JC, Chan P, Wang CH, Jeng C, Hsieh MH, Kao PF, et al. The effects of exercise training on walking function and perception of health status in elderly patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Intern Med. 2002;252:448–55. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 160 Nicolai SP, Teijink JA, Prins MH. Exercise Therapy in Peripheral Arterial Disease Study G. Multicenter randomized clinical trial of supervised exercise therapy with or without feedback versus walking advice for intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:348–55. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 161 Guidon M, McGee H. Exercise-based interventions and health-related quality of life in intermittent claudication: a 20-year (1989–2008) review. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17:140–54. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 162 Guidon M, McGee H. One-year effect of a supervised exercise programme on functional capacity and quality of life in peripheral arterial disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:397–404. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 163 Kakkos SK, Geroulakos G, Nicolaides AN. Improvement of the walking ability in intermittent claudication due to superficial femoral artery occlusion with supervised exercise and pneumatic foot and calf compression: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:164–75. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 164 Savage P, Ricci MA, Lynn M, Gardner A, Knight S, Brochu M, et al. Effects of home versus supervised exercise for patients with intermittent claudication. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001;21:152–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 165 Gardner AW, Montgomery PS, Wang M, Xu C. Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:1126–34. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 166 Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, Ballard RM, Bloodgood B, Conroy DE, et al. Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: a review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:1242–51. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 167 Kirk-Sanchez NJ, McGough EL. Physical exercise and cognitive performance in the elderly: current perspectives. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:51–62. First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 168 Gomez-Pinilla F, Hillman C. The influence of exercise on cognitive abilities. Compr Physiol. 2013;3:403–28. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 169 Gommans LN, Saarloos R, Scheltinga MR, Houterman S, de Bie RA, Fokkenrood HJ, et al. Editor’s Choice – The effect of supervision on walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication: a meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:169–84. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 170 Abaraogu UO, Dall PM, Seenan CA. The effect of structured patient education on physical activity in patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:58–68. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 171 Bearne LM, Volkmer B, Peacock J, Sekhon M, Fisher G, Galea Holmes MN, et al. Effect of a home-based, walking exercise behavior change intervention vs usual care on walking in adults with peripheral artery disease: the MOSAIC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327:1344–55. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 172 McDermott MM, Liu K, Guralnik JM, Criqui MH, Spring B, Tian L, et al. Home-based walking exercise intervention in peripheral artery disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:57–65. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 173 McDermott MM, Spring B, Berger JS, Treat-Jacobson D, Conte MS, Creager MA, et al. Effect of a home-based exercise intervention of wearable technology and telephone coaching on walking performance in peripheral artery disease: the HONOR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:1665–76. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 174 Behrendt CA, Thomalla G, Rimmele DL, Petersen EL, Twerenbold R, Debus ES, et al. Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and risk factors in the Hamburg City Health Study: a cross-sectional analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023;65:590–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 175 Pabon M, Cheng S, Altin SE, Sethi SS, Nelson MD, Moreau KL, et al. Sex differences in peripheral artery disease. Circ Res. 2022;130:496–511. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 176 Behrendt CA, Sigvant B, Kuchenbecker J, Grima MJ, Schermerhorn M, Thomson IA, et al. Editor’s Choice – International variations and sex disparities in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a report from VASCUNET and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60:873–80. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 177 Detriche G, Guedon A, Mohamedi N, Sellami O, Cheng C, Galloula A, et al. Women specific characteristics and 1-year outcome among patients hospitalized for peripheral artery disease: a monocentric cohort analysis in a tertiary center. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:824466. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 178 Heidemann F, Kuchenbecker J, Peters F, Kotov A, Marschall U, L' Hoest H, et al. A health insurance claims analysis on the effect of female sex on long-term outcomes after peripheral endovascular interventions for symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74:780–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 179 Hirsch AT, Allison MA, Gomes AS, Corriere MA, Duval S, Ershow AG, et al. A call to action: women and peripheral artery disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:1449–72. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 180 Kotov A, Heidemann F, Kuchenbecker J, Peters F, Marschall U, Acar L, et al. Sex disparities in long term outcomes after open surgery for chronic limb threatening ischaemia: a propensity score matched analysis of health insurance claims. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61:423–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 181 Singh N, Liu K, Tian L, Criqui MH, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, et al. Leg strength predicts mortality in men but not in women with peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:624–31. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 182 McDermott MM, Ferrucci L, Liu K, Guralnik JM, Tian L, Kibbe M, et al. Women with peripheral arterial disease experience faster functional decline than men with peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:707–14. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 183 Gommans LN, Scheltinga MR, van Sambeek MR, Maas AH, Bendermacher BL, Teijink JA. Gender differences following supervised exercise therapy in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:681–8. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 184 Regensteiner JG, Bauer TA, Reusch JE, Brandenburg SL, Sippel JM, Vogelsong AM, et al. Abnormal oxygen uptake kinetic responses in women with type II diabetes mellitus. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998;85:310–7. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 185 Lanzi S, Pousaz A, Calanca L, Mazzolai L. Sex-based differences in supervised exercise therapy outcomes for symptomatic peripheral artery disease. Vasc Med. 2023;28:147–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 186 Cetlin MD, Polonsky T, Ho K, Zhang D, Tian L, Zhao L, et al. Barriers to participation in supervised exercise therapy reported by people with peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2023;77:506–14. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 187 Gupta T, Manning P, Kolte D, Smolderen KG, Stone N, Henry JG, et al. Exercise therapy referral and participation in patients with peripheral artery disease: insights from the PORTRAIT registry. Vasc Med. 2021;26:654–6. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 188 Harwood A, Smith G, Broadbent E, Cayton T, Carradice D, Chetter I. Access to supervised exercise services for peripheral vascular disease patients. Bull R Coll Surgeons Engl. 2017;99:207–11. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 189 Harwood AE, Smith GE, Cayton T, Broadbent E, Chetter IC. A systematic review of the uptake and adherence rates to supervised exercise programs in patients with intermittent claudication. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;34:280–9. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 190 Li Y, Rother U, Rosenberg Y, Hinterseher I, Uhl C, Mylonas S, et al. A prospective survey study on the education and awareness about walking exercise amongst inpatients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in Germany. Vasa. 2023;52:218–23. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • 191 Rother U, Dorr G, Malyar N, Muller OJ, Steinbauer M, Ito W, et al. How German vascular surgeons and angiologists judge walking exercise for patients with PAD. Vasa. 2023;52:224–9. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • 192 Saxon JT, Safley DM, Mena-Hurtado C, Heyligers J, Fitridge R, Shishehbor M, et al. Adherence to guideline-recommended therapy-including supervised exercise therapy referral-across peripheral artery disease specialty clinics: insights from the International PORTRAIT Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e012541. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 193 Lanzi S, Belch J, Brodmann M, Madaric J, Bura-Riviere A, Visona A, et al. Supervised exercise training in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Vasa. 2022;51:267–74. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • 194 Parodi JC, Fernandez S, Moscovich F, Pulmaria C. Hydration may reverse most symptoms of lower extremity intermittent claudication or rest pain. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72:1459–63. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 195 Mannarino E, Pasqualini L, Innocente S, Scricciolo V, Rignanese A, Ciuffetti G. Physical training and antiplatelet treatment in stage II peripheral arterial occlusive disease: alone or combined? Angiology. 1991;42:513–21. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 196 Hobbs SD, Marshall T, Fegan C, Adam DJ, Bradbury AW. The effect of supervised exercise and cilostazol on coagulation and fibrinolysis in intermittent claudication: a randomized controlled trial. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:65–70.; discussion 70. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar