Abstract
Abstract. This study examines the usefulness of easy to obtain EEG measures to discriminate learning-disabled children (LD) from healthy control children. Here the spectral power in the delta, theta, alpha, and beta EEG bands and various power ratios (theta/alpha, theta/beta, beta/alpha, beta/theta, beta/[alpha+theta], [delta+theta]/alpha, alpha/delta, and [theta+alpha]/beta) are applied. These measures were subjected to a factor analysis with varimax rotation revealing four factors explaining 90 % of the entire variance. Factor 1 represents the power of the slow EEG frequency bands delta and theta, factor 2 the relationship between fast and slow frequency bands, factor 3 the slow to fast ratios, and factor 4 the absolute power of nearly all frequency bands. Group differences were found for three factor scores (1, 3, and 4). The linear discriminant analysis with the four factor scores as dependent and the group allocation as independent variables revealed a correct classification of 86 %. Although this classification is far from being perfect it is nevertheless reasonable high and statistically significant. Thus, EEG measures like the one used in this study might support the diagnosis of this difficult to diagnose disability. In addition, the EEG measures identified provide a deeper insight into the neural underpinnings of this disability. Based on this knowledge it might be possible to design new therapeutic strategies to treat LD.
Zusammenfassung. Im Rahmen dieser Studie wird untersucht, ob relativ einfach zu messende EEG-Kennwerte genutzt werden können, um lerngestörte von unauffälligen Kindern zu unterscheiden. Als EEG-Kennwerte werden die spektrale Dichten im delta-, theta-, alpha- und beta-Band sowie verschiedene Verhältnismaße (theta/alpha, theta/beta, beta/alpha, beta/theta, beta/[alpha+theta], [delta+theta]/alpha, alpha/delta, and [theta+alpha]/beta). Diese Kennwerte wurden einer Faktoranalyse mit Varimaxrotation zugeführt, die vier Faktoren identifizierte, die 90 % der Gesamtvarianz erklärten. Faktor 1 erklärt vor allem die Varianz der Spektraldichten der langsamen EEG-Bänder, Faktor 2 die der Verhältnisse der Spektraldichten schneller zu langsamen Frequenzbändern, Faktor 3 die der Verhältnisse der Spektraldichten von langsamen zu schnellen Frequenzbändern, während Faktor 4 die Varianz der absoluten Spektraldichten in allen Frequenzbändern erklärte. Für die Faktorwerte der Faktoren 1, 3 und 4 ergaben sich signifikante Gruppenunterschiede zwischen den lerngestörten und unauffälligen Kindern. Diese Faktorwerte dieser 4 Faktoren wurden dann genutzt, um mit Hilfe einer linearen Diskriminanzanalyse lerngestörte von unauffälligen Kindern zu unterscheiden. Die Klassifikationsgenauigkeit erreichte mit 86 % eine sehr gute Trefferquote. Obwohl diese Klassifikation nicht perfekt ist, offenbaren sich diese EEG-Kennwerte als nützliche Kennwerte für die objektive Klassifizierung lerngestörter Kinder. Insofern könnten diese Kennwerte als Hilfsmittel für die Diagnose von Lernstörungen herangezogen werden. Darüber hinaus könnten diese EEG-Kennwerte auch bei der Planung von und Durchführung von Therapiemaßnahmen hilfreich sein.
References
2013). A decade of EEG Theta/Beta Ratio Research in ADHD: a meta-analysis. Journal of Attention Disorders, 17, 374 – 383.
(1992). Electroencephalography during surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermia. Anesthesiology, 76, 878 – 891.
(2006). Follow-up study of learning-disabled children treated with neurofeedback or placebo. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 37, 198 – 203.
(2014). Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: a meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 2981 – 2990.
(2010). EEG-based vigilance analysis by using fisher score and PCA algorithm. Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, 1, 175 – 179.
(2013). Identification of learning disabilities: implications of proposed DSM-5 criteria for school-based assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(1), 52 – 57.
(2001). The clinical role of computerized EEG in the evaluation and treatment of learning and attention disorders in children and adolescents. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences, 13(2), 171 – 186.
(2002). EEG differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate and dexamphetamine in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 194 – 205.
(2007). Effects of stimulant medications on the EEG of girls with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2700 – 2708.
(2009).
(Applying real time physiological measures of cognitive load to improve training . In D.D. Schmorrow, I.V. EstabrookeM. GrootjenEds., Foundations of augmented cognition. Neuroergonomics and operational neuroscience (Vol. 5638, pp. 469– 478). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.2015). Bridging the Gap between Perceptual and Cognitive Perspectives on Absolute Pitch. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 366 – 371.
(2002). Sources of EEG activity in learning disabled children. Clinical Electroencephalography, 33, 160 – 164.
(2003). EEG and behavioral changes following neurofeedback treatment in learning disabled children. Clinical Electroencephalography, 34, 145 – 152.
(2012). Event-related EEG oscillations to semantically unrelated words in normal and learning disabled children. Brain and Cognition, 80, 74 – 82.
(2006). Quantitative EEG in children with learning disabilities: analysis of band power. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 64, 376 – 381.
(1999). Evaluation of an adaptive automation system using three EEG indices with a visual tracking task. Biological Psychology, 50(1), 61 – 76.
(1988). Development of the EEG of school-age children and adolescents. I. Analysis of band power. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 69(2), 91 – 99.
(2003). EEG power and coherence in children with educational problems. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society, 20, 273 – 282.
(2012). Intrinsic brain connectivity related to age in young and middle aged adults. PLoS One, 7(9), e44067.
(1990). Effect of sex, psychosocial disadvantages and biological risk factors on EEG maturation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 482 – 491.
(2014). Dynamic modulation of epileptic high frequency oscillations by the phase of slower cortical rhythms. Experimental Neurology, 251, 30 – 38.
(2011). A strong parietal hub in the small-world network of coloured-hearing synaesthetes during resting state EEG. Journal of Neuropsychology, 5, 178 – 202.
(2005). Identifying specific learning disability: is responsiveness to intervention the answer? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 553 – 562.
(2005). Decreased EEG synchronization in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiology of Aging, 26, 165 – 171.
(2012). Functional brain network efficiency predicts intelligence. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 1393 – 1406.
(2013). The effects of working memory training on functional brain network efficiency. Cortex, 49, 2424 – 2438.
(2012). Brain state regulation during normal development: Intrinsic activity fluctuations in simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Neuroimage, 60, 1426 – 1439.
(2006). The Cultural Work of Learning Disabilities. Educational Researcher, 35, 12 – 17.
(1999). Assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via quantitative electroencephalography: an initial validation study. Neuropsychology, 13, 424 – 433.
(2014). Group Independent Component Analysis (gICA) and Current Source Density (CSD) in the study of EEG in ADHD adults. Clinical Neurophysiology, 125(1), 83 – 97.
(2014). EEG theta/beta ratio as a potential biomarker for attentional control and resilience against deleterious effects of stress on attention. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 782 – 791.
(2009). Human performance evaluation based on EEG signal analysis: A prospective review. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 1879 – 1882.
(2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 676 – 682.
(2013). Shifted coupling of EEG driving frequencies and fMRI resting state networks in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. PLoS One, 8(10), e76604.
(2013). Specific learning disability and its newest definition: which is comprehensive? And which is insufficient? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(1), 26 – 33.
(2011). Niedermeyer’s Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields (6th revised ed.). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
(2005). Electrophysiological ratio markers for the balance between reward and punishment. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 685 – 690.
(2011). Brain circuitry model for mental illness will transform management, NIH mental health director says. British Medical Journal, 343, d5581.
(