Social Judgment Norms and Social Utility: When It Is More Valuable to Be Useful Than Desirable
Abstract
The idea of social norm is often associated with the idea of value. However, such a simple association has often been criticized. The criticism seems to lie in the polysemy and the vagueness associated with the idea of value. The present study was based on the distinction drawn between two dimensions of value that people or objects can have, and its experimental operationalization in personality traits: (1) social desirability (SD), which refers to affective valence or motivation and covers traits such as sympathetic and nice, and (2) social utility (SU), which corresponds to how well a person meets the requirements of a given society, and covers traits like dynamic and competent. The desirability-utility distinction was used here to investigate what kind of value a norm can activate. Our hypothesis was that SU would be more elicited by normativity than SD. This hypothesis was tested in three studies in which participants were asked to describe target people (with traits pertaining either to SD or to SU) whose answers on a questionnaire varied in degree of normativeness (judge paradigm). The results support the hypothesis; the more normative targets are, the more they are described in SU terms.
References
(1981). Foundations on information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
(1994). Traité de la servitude libérale. Paris: Dunod.
(1995). La connaissance des utilités sociales. Psychologie Française, 40, 375–387.
(2005). Les illusions libérales, individualisme et pouvoir social. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires.
(1988). The norm of internality in the explanation of psychological events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 299–316.
(2001). Normativity and self-presentation: Theoretical bases of self-presentation training for evaluation situations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16, 490–508.
(1998). Internality attribution in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 123–140.
(1986). Norme d’internalité et pouvoir social en psychologie quotidienne. Psychologie Française, 31, 100–108.
(2000). Désirabilité et utilité sociale, deux dimensions de la valeur: Une exemplification dans l’analyse des professions. Unpublished Dissertation. Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France
(2005). Social utility and social desirability: Two dimensions of the value construct. Manuscript submitted for publication
(2006). Rapports entre groupes et dimensions de la valeur. Manuscript submitted for publication
(1998). When social role salience leads to social roles rejection: Modest self-presentation among women and men in two cultures. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 24, 473–481.
(1984). Social differentiation and non-differentiation. In , The social dimension. London: Cambridge University Press
(1970). Norms and normative behavior: Field studies of social interdependences. In J. Macaulay & L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior. New York: Academic Press
(2000). Jugements de responsabilité et registres de connaissance. In , Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales, (Vol. . 7.) Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes
(2001). Social norms, social value and judgments of responsibility. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 60, 35–46.
(1994). La norme d’internalité et le libéralisme. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires.
(2000). Self-presentation strategies and social judgments – desirability and social utility of causal explanation. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59, 170–182.
(2003). A Sociocognitive approach to social norms. London: Routledge.
(2001). Désirabilité et utilité: Deux composantes de la valeur des personnes dans l’évaluation sociale. Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 16, 490–508.
(2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146.
(2000). Attribution d’internalité dans des contextes intergroupes minimaux. In , Perspectives Cognitives et Conduites Sociales, (Vol. 7) Fribourg: DelVal.
(1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(1956). The sane society. London: Routledge.
(2003). Paradigms of the sociocognitive approach. In , A sociocognitive approach to social norms London: Routledge.
(1999). Le rôle des explications causales dans l’internalisation des valeurs. In , La construction sociale de la personne Grenoble: Presses Universitaires.
(1981). A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: The norm of internality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 643–649.
(1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.
(1970). Altruism – An examination of the concept and a review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 258–302.
(1985). Altruism and aggression. In , The Handbook of social psychology. New York: Random House
(1954). A theory of social control. New York: McGraw Hill.
(1999). Un critère d’évaluation des énoncés explicatifs: La plausibilité. Lilles: Presses du Septentrion.
(1984). Age and sequencing norms in the transition to adulthood. Social Forces. 63. pp. 229–244.
(1973). Measures of internal-external control. In , Measures of social psychological attitudes Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
(2002). Applying the affordance concept of traits: A person perception study. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 28, 1327–1334.
(1978). Distortion in person perception as a consequence of the need for effective control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 598–602.
(1957). The Measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
(1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptative concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211–231.
(2003). Approach-avoidance values of target-directed behaviors elicited by target-traits: The role of evaluative trait dimensions. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain, Cognition, 11.
(1981). A model of the self as an aspect of the human information-processing system. In , Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1973). The Nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
(1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In , Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 6) New York: Academic Press.
(1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In , The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium, (Vol. 8) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1977). Internal locus of control as a value. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 237–242.
(1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371–394.
(1997). Sociology in focus. Lancs., UK: Causeway Press.
(1997). Parallels between competence – versus morality – related traits and individualistic versus collectivistic values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 245–256.
(1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245–287.
