Skip to main content
Short Research Note

Appraisal of Musical Syntax Violations by Primary School Children

Effects of Age and Practice

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000084

In Western tonal music, musical phrases end with an explicit, highly expected, harmonic consequent. Primary school children were exposed to musical stimuli at two levels of complexity: children’s songs and polyphonic piano pieces. The endings (cadences) of all stimuli were either congruous or contained subtle or marked syntax violations, resulting in three levels of syntactic congruity. The children rated the endings of musical stimuli with respect to goodness of fit by drawing a crossbar through a continuous line stretching between a happy and a sad icon. All children, independent of age, rated the three levels of syntactic congruity hierarchically, for both levels of complexity. Compared to younger children, older children gave more extreme positive and negative ratings to congruous and markedly incongruous endings, respectively, but no developmental trend was found for the intermediate ratings of subtly incongruous endings. We conclude that, as a consequence of mere exposure, implicit learning of musical syntax manifests already in 6-year-old children and develops progressively with age. Moreover, we found indications of modulation of this perceptual development by musical training, an effect reminiscent of the interaction between long-term spontaneous developmental processes and deliberate learning in general cognitive functioning.

References

  • James, C. E., Britz, J., Vuilleumier, P., Hauert, C. A., Michel, C. M. (2008). Early neuronal responses in right limbic structures mediate harmony incongruity processing in musical experts. Neuroimage, 42, 1597–1608. doi 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.025 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jentschke, S., Koelsch, S. (2009). Musical training modulates the development of syntax processing in children. NeuroImage, 47, 735–744. doi 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.090 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katahira, K., Abla, D., Masuda, S., Okanoya, K. (2008). Feedback-based error monitoring processes during musical performance: An ERP study. Neuroscience Research, 61, 120–128. doi 10.1016/j.neures.2008.02.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koelsch, S., Jentschke, S. (2010). Differences in electric brain responses to melodies and chords. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2251–2262. doi 10.1162/jocn.2009.21338 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koelsch, S., Fritz, T., Schulze, K., Alsop, D., Schlaug, G. (2005). Adults and children processing music: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 25, 1068–1076. doi 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.050 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koelsch, S., Grossmann, T., Gunter, T. C., Hahne, A., Schroger, E., Friederici, A. D. (2003). Children processing music: Electric brain responses reveal musical competence and gender differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 683–693. doi 10.1162/089892903322307401 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koelsch, S., Jentschke, S., Sammler, D., Mietchen, D. (2007). Untangling syntactic and sensory processing: An ERP study of music perception. Psychophysiology, 44, 476–490. doi 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00517.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krumhansl, C. L., Keil, F. C. (1982). Acquisition of the hierarchy of tonal functions in music. Memory and Cognition, 10, 243–251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lynch, M. P., Eilers, R. E., Oller, D., Urbano, R. C. (1990). Innateness, experience, and music perception. Psychological Science, 1, 272–276. doi 10.3758/BF03197636 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Magne, C., Schon, D., Besson, M. (2006). Musician children detect pitch violations in both music and language better than nonmusician children: Behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 199–211. doi 10.1162/089892906775783660 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moreno, S., Marques, C., Santos, A., Santos, M., Castro, S. L., Besson, M. (2009). Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: More evidence for brain plasticity. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 712–723. doi 10.1093/cercor/bhn120 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oberauer, K., Kliegl, R. (2006). A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 601–626. doi 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patel, A. D. (2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 674–681. doi 10.1038/nn1082 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., The R Core Team . (2009). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–96. Retrieved from CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Plantinga, J., Trainor, L. J. T. (2009). Melody recognition by two-month-old infants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, EL58–EL62. doi 10.1121/1.3049583 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schellenberg, E. G., Bigand, E., Poulin-Charronnat, B., Garnier, C., Stevens, C. (2005). Children’s implicit knowledge of harmony in Western music. Developmental Science, 8, 551–566. doi 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00447.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siegler, R. S., Svetina, M. (2002). A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: Comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development, 73, 793–809. doi 10.1111/1467–8624.00439 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stalinski, S. M., Schellenberg, E. G., Trehub, S. E. (2008). Developmental changes in the perception of pitch contour: Distinguishing up from down. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 1759–1763. doi 10.1121/1.2956470 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strait, D. L., Kraus, N. (2011). Can you hear me now? Musical training shapes functional brain networks for selective auditory attention and hearing speech in noise. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 113. doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00113 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • The R Development Core Team . (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from www.R-project.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Trainor, L. J., Trehub, S. E. (1993). Musical context effects in infants and adults: Key distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 615–626. doi 10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.615 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trainor, L. J., Trehub, S. E. (1994). Key membership and implied harmony in Western tonal music: Developmental perspectives. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 125–132. doi 10.3758/BF03213891 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trainor, L. J., Shahin, A. J., Roberts, L. E. (2009). Understanding the benefits of musical training: Effects on oscillatory brain activity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 133–142. doi 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009. 04589.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trehub, S. E., Schellenberg, E. G., Kamenetsky, S. B. (1999). Infants’ and adults’ perception of scale structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 965–975. doi 10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.965 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zentner, M. R., Kagan, J. (1998). Infants’ perception of consonance and dissonance in music. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 483–492. doi 10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90021-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar