Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Originalia

Entwicklung und Validierung einer Skala der Bereitschaft zu verzeihen (SBV)

Eine vergleichende Evaluation von Cut-Off-Werten

Published Online:April 11, 2008https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.54.2.71

Abstract

Zusammenfassung. Verzeihen dient der Bewältigung von Kränkungen und zwischenmenschlichen Konflikten. Es werden Definitionen und Operationalisierungen aus dem englischen Sprachraum vorgestellt. Die Entwicklung eines deutschsprachigen szenarienbasierten Instruments zur Erhebung der Bereitschaft zu verzeihen wird beschrieben. Es wird eine Differenzierung des Konstruktes in zwei Komponenten vorgeschlagen: (a) die Bereitschaft, anderen Menschen zu verzeihen, wenn diese ihre Tat bedauern, (b) die Bereitschaft, anderen Menschen zu verzeihen, wenn diese ihre Tat nicht bedauern. Die Messeigenschaften der neu entwickelten Skala wurden in fünf Studien an insgesamt 1824 Probanden untersucht. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass das Instrument gute psychometrische Eigenschaften besitzt. Die theoretische Differenzierung des Konstrukts wird empirisch bestätigt. Hinweise auf die Konstruktvalidität der Skala ergeben sich aus Zusammenhängen mit theoretisch einschlägigen Referenzkonstrukten: der habituellen Ärgerneigung, der Wahrnehmung und Klarheit über eigene und fremde Gefühle, positiver und negativer Affektivität, den fünf Persönlichkeitsfaktoren und sozialer Erwünschtheit. Für die Konstruktvalidität der Skala sprechen ferner konvergente Korrelationen mit anderen Maßen der Bereitschaft zu verzeihen.


Development and validation of a measure of willingness to forgive

Abstract. Forgiveness contributes to coping with interpersonal hurts and transgressions. Definitions and measures of the construct are provided. The development and validation of a new, scenario­based scale for measuring willingness to forgive is described. A conceptual distinction is proposed between (a) willingness to forgive a transgressor who regrets his behavior, and (b) willingness to forgive a transgressor who does not regret his fault. Data from five studies with a total sample of 1,824 participants affirm the psychometric quality of the scale and support the conceptual distinction of the construct with regard to the transgressor’s behavior (repentance versus nonrepentance). Evidence on the construct validity of the scale was obtained from its correlation with measures for theoretically related and unrelated constructs, i.e., trait anger, attention to and clarity of one’s own and other’s feelings, positive and negative affectivity, the five personality factors, and social desirability. The scale converges well with other measures of the same construct.

Literatur

  • Allemand, M. , Amberg, I. , Zimprich, D. , Fincham, F. D. (2007). The role of trait forgiveness and relationship satisfaction in episodic forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 199– 217. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Al–Mabuk, R. H. , Enright, R. D. , Cardis, P. A. (1995). Forgiveness education with parentally lovedeprived late adolescents. Journal of Moral Education, 24, 427– 444. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531– 1544. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C. , Paunonen, S. V. , Helmes, E. , Jackson, D. N. (1998). Kin altruism, reciprocal altruism, and the Big Five personality factors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 243– 255. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berry, J. W. , Worthington, E. L., Jr. , O’Connor, L. E. , Parrott, L. , Wade, N. E. (2005). Forgivingness, vengeful rumination, and affective traits. Journal of Personality, 73, 1– 43. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berry, J. W. , Worthington, E. L., Jr. , Parrott, L. , O’Connor, L. E. , Wade, N. E. (2001). Dispositional forgivingness: Development and construct validity of the transgression narrative test of forgivingness (TNTF). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1277– 1290. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, R. P. (2003). Measuring individual differences in the tendency to forgive: Construct validity and links with depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 759– 771. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Darby, B. W. , Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Children’s reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 742– 753. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeShea, L. (2003). A scenario–based scale of willingness to forgive. Individual Differences Research, 1, 201– 217. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dodge, K. A. (1980). Social cognition and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Development, 51, 162– 170. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eaton, J. , Struthers, C. W. , Santelli, A. G. (2006). The mediating role of perceptual validation in the repentance–forgiveness process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1389– 1401. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Emmons, R. A. (2000). Personality and forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough , K. I. Pargament , C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 156– 175). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Enright, R. , Fitzgibbons, R. (2000). Helping clients forgive: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Enright, R. D. , Gassin, E. A. , Wu, C. (1992). Forgiveness: A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 21, 99– 114. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Enright, R. D. , North, J. (1998). Exploring forgiveness. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fincham, F. D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7, 1– 23. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harris, A. H. S. , Thoresen, C. E. (2005). Forgiveness, unforgiveness, health, and disease. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 321– 333). New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hebl, J. H. , Enright, R. D. (1993). Forgiveness as a psychotherapeutic goal with elderly females. Psychotherapy, 30, 658– 667. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoyt, W. T. , McCullough, M. E. (2005). Issues in the multimodal measurement of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 109– 123). New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. , Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424– 453. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huang, S. T. , Enright, R. D. (2000). Forgiveness and anger–related emotions in Taiwan: Implications for therapy. Psychotherapy, 37, 71– 79. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • John, O. P. , Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102– 138). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kanz, J. E. (2000). How do people conceptualize and use forgiveness? The Forgiveness Attitudes Questionnaire. Counseling and Values, 44, 174– 188. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kearns, J. N. , Fincham, F. D. (2004). A protype analysis of forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 838– 855. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krohne, H. W. , Egloff, B. , Kohlmann, C.–W. , Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der „Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 139– 156. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lischetzke, T. , Eid, M. , Wittig, F. , Trierweiler, L. (2001). Die Wahrnehmung eigener und fremder Gefühle: Konstruktion und Validierung von Skalen zur Erhebung der emotionalen Selbst– und Fremdaufmerksamkeit sowie der Klarheit über Gefühle. Diagnostica, 47, 167– 177. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Macaskill, A. , Maltby, J. , Day, L. (2002). Forgiveness of self and others and emotional empathy. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 663– 665. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R. , Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five–factor theory perspective. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCullough, M. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well–being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 43– 55. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCullough, M. E. (2004). Forgiveness. In C. Peterson, M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (pp. 445– 459). New York: Oxford/American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCullough, M. E. , Bellah, C. G. , Kilpatrick, S. D. , Johnson, J. L. (2001). Vengefulness: Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well–being, and the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 601– 610. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCullough, M. E. , Hoyt, W. T. , Rachal, K. C. (2000). What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs. In M. E. McCullough , K. I. Pargament , C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 65– 88). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCullough, M. E. , Pargament, K. I. , Thoresen, C. E. (2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCullough, M. E. , Rachal, F. C. , Sandage, S. J. , Worthington, E. L., Jr. , Brown, S. W. , Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiveness in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–– 1603. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCullough, M. E. , Root, L. M. (2005). Forgiveness as change. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 91– 107). New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCullough, M. E. , Witvliet, C. V. (2002). The psychology of forgiveness. In C. R. Snyder, S. L. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 446– 458). New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCullough, M. E. , Worthington, E. L., Jr. , Rachal, F. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meng, X.–L. , Rosenthal, R. & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172– 175. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mullet, E. , Houdbine, A. , Laumonier, S. , Girard, M. (1998). „Forgivingness”: Factor structure in a sample of young, middle–aged, and elderly adults. European Psychologist, 3, 289– 297. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Mullet, E. , Neto, F. , Rivière, S. (2005). Personality and its effects on resentment, revenge, forgiveness, and self–forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 159– 181). New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muñoz Sastre, M. T. , Vinsonneau, G. , Neto, F. , Girard, M. , Mullet, E. (2003). Forgivingness and satisfaction with life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 323– 335. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. , Muthén, B. (2004). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neto, F. , Mullet, E. (2004). Personality, self–esteem, and self–construal as correlates of forgivingness. European Journal of Personality, 18, 15– 30. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur. Zur Validität des Fünf–Faktoren–Modells der Persönlichkeit. Regensburg: Roderer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, C. , Park, N. (2004). Classification and measurement of character strengths: Implications for practice. In P. A. Linley, S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 433– 466). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roberts, R. C. (1995). Forgivingness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 289– 306. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rye, M. S. , Loiacono, D. M. , Folck, C. D. , Olszewski, B. T. , Heim, T. A. , Madia, B. P. (2001). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales. Current Psychology, 20, 260– 277. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schallberger, U. , Venetz, M. (1999). Kurzversionen des MRS–Inventars von Ostendorf (1990) zur Erhebung der fünf „großen” Persönlichkeitsfaktoren. Forschungsbericht, Nr. 30. Psychologisches Institut, Universität Zürich. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. , Eid, M. , Maes, J. (2003). Synergistic person x situation interaction in distributive justice behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 141– 147. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. , Gollwitzer, M. , Förster, N. , Montada, L. (2004). Effects of objective and subjective account components on forgiving. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 465– 485. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwenkmezger, P. , Hodapp, V. , Spielberger, C. D. (1992). Das State–Trait–Ärgerausdrucks–Inventar (STAXI). Handbuch. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwennen, C. (2004). Verzeihen. In A. E. Auhagen (Hrsg.), Positive Psychologie. Anleitung zum „besseren” Leben (S. 139– 153). Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R. , Schmitt, M. , Eid, M. (1999). Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389– 408. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stocké, V. (2003). Deutsche Kurzsskala zur Erhebung des Bedürfnisses nach sozialer Anerkennung. In A. Glöckner–Rist (Hrsg.), ZUMA–Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente. Version 7.00. Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Takaku, S. (2001). The effects of apology and perspective taking on interpersonal forgiveness: A dissonance–attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 494– 508. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thompson, L. Y. , Snyder, C. R. (2003). Measuring forgiveness. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 301–312). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, L. Y. , Snyder, C. R. , Hoffman, L. , Michael, S. T. , Rasmussen, H. N. , Billings, L. S. , Heinze, L. , Neufeld, J. E. , Shorey, H. S. , Roberts, J. C. , Roberts, D. E. (2005). Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73, 313– 359. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Walsh, W. , Betz, N. (2000). Tests and assessment. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D. , Clark, L. A. (1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five–factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 441– 476. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D. , Clark, L. A. , Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063– 1070. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weiner, B. , Graham, S. , Peter, O. , Zmuidinas, M. (1991). Public confession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59, 281– 312. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Werner, R. , Appel, C. (2004). Deutscher Vergebungsfragebogen nach McCullough et al. (1998). In A. Glöckner–Rist (Hrsg.), ZUMA–Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente. Version 8.00. Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Worthington, E. L., Jr. (1998). Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2005). Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Worthington, E. L., Jr. , Scherer, M. (2004). Forgiveness is an emotion–focused coping strategy that can reduce health risks and promote health resilience: Theory, review, and hypotheses. Psychology and Health, 19, 385– 405. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Worthington, E. L., Jr. , Wade, N. G. (1999). The social psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385– 418. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar