Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000018

Zusammenfassung. Freiwilliges Arbeitsengagement hat sich nach fast 50-jähriger Forschungsarbeit in der organisationspsychologischen Forschung zur beruflichen Leistung als bedeutsames Kriterium neben der aufgabenbezogenen Leistung etabliert. Übertragungen des Konzeptes auf andere Anwendungsbereiche sind bislang jedoch nur spärlich und größtenteils fragmentarisch erfolgt. In diesem Beitrag wird nach der Diskussion bisheriger Konzeptionen ein Ansatz vorgestellt, der die Vielzahl von Konzeptionen in diesem Feld (z.B. Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Contextual Performance, Extra-Rollenverhalten, Prosoziales organisationales Verhalten, Citizenship Performance) integriert. Erstmals werden die bislang häufig vernachlässigten konstruktiv-kritischen Formen freiwilligen Arbeitsengagements systematisch in einen übergreifenden Ansatz eingegliedert und es wird eine umfassende facettentheoretische Definition erarbeitet. Schließlich wird die Übertragung des Konzeptes freiwilligen Arbeitsengagements auf andere als klassische organisationspsychologische Anwendungsbereiche aufgezeigt, um seine Bedeutung als übergreifendes Rahmenkonzept darzustellen. Die Integration von Forschungsergebnissen zu entsprechenden Verhaltensweisen aus verschiedensten Kontexten (d.h. nicht nur am Arbeitsplatz, sondern auch in Schulen, Sportvereinen etc.) in einem gemeinsamen Rahmenkonzept eröffnet die Möglichkeit, Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede, z.B. bzgl. Häufigkeiten, Prädiktoren und der relativen Bedeutsamkeit der unterschiedlichen Formen freiwilligen Engagements in unterschiedlichen Kontexten zu untersuchen.


Citizenship performance: A review and theoretical integration

Abstract. After nearly 50 years of research, citizenship performance has been established as a relevant criterion alongside task performance in performance research in organizational psychology. Research transferring this concept to other fields of application is sparse and for the most part has only done so fragmentarily. After the discussion of prior conceptualizations, our article introduces an approach which integrates the various conceptualizations in this field (e.g., organizational citizenship behavior, contextual performance, extra-role behavior, prosocial organizational behavior). For the first time, challenging citizenship behaviors that have to date often been neglected are systematically incorporated into an integrative framework and a comprehensive facet theoretical definition is developed. Finally, the citizenship performance concept is transferred to applied contexts other than classic organizational psychology to demonstrate its relevance as an overall framework. Integrating findings concerning these behaviors from diverse contexts (i.e., not only at the workplace but also at schools, sports clubs, etc.) into a common framework allows analyses of similarities and differences, e.g., concerning frequencies, predictors, and the relative importance of the different forms of citizenship performance in varying contexts.

Literatur

  • Allen, T. D. , Barnard, S. , Rush, M. C. , Russell, J. E. A. (2000). Ratings of organizational citizenship behavior: Does the source make a difference? Human Resource Management Review, 10, 97–114. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aryee, S. , Chay, Y. W. (2001). Workplace justice, citizenship behavior, and turnover intentions in a union context: Examining the mediating role of perceived union support and union instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 154–160. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B. , Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 147–154. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bateman, T. S. , Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making? The Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232–244. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, T. E. , Vance, R. J. (1993). Construct validity of three types of organizational citizenship behavior: An illustration of the direct product model with refinements. Journal of Management, 19, 663–682. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bettencourt, L. A. (2004). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors: the direct and moderating influence of goal orientation. Journal of Retailing, 80, 165–180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bierhoff, H.-W. (2006). Prosoziales Verhalten in der Schule. In D. H. Rost (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (3. Aufl., S. 602–608). Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bierhoff, H.-W. (2007). Prosoziales Verhalten. In K. Jonas, W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie: Eine Einführung (5. Aufl., S. 295–327). Heidelberg: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bierhoff, H.-W. , Müller, G. (1999). Positive feelings and cooperative support in project groups. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 180–190. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bierhoff, H.-W. , Müller, G. (2000). Editorial: Freiwilliges Arbeitsengagement in Organisationen. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 31, 119–120. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bierhoff, H.-W. , Müller, G. , Küpper, B. (2000). Prosoziales Arbeitsverhalten: Entwicklung und Überprüfung eines Messinstruments zur Erfassung des freiwilligen Arbeitsengagements. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 31, 141–153. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bierhoff, H.-W. , Rohmann, E. , Herner, M. J. (2006). Freiwilliges Arbeitsengagement. In M. Ringlstetter, S. Kaiser, G. Müller-Seitz (Hrsg.), Positives Management: Zentrale Konzepte und Ideen des Positive Organizational Scholarship (S. 35–52). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bierhoff, H.-W. , Spanke, C. (2002). Altruistisches Verhalten am Arbeitsplatz und Führung. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 46, 222–226. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Borg, I. , Shye, S. (1995). Facet theory: Form and content. Newbury Park: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borman, W. C. (2004). The concept of organizational citizenship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 238–241. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borman, W. C. , Buck, D. E. , Hanson, M. A. , Motowidlo, S. J. , Stark, S. , Drasgow, F. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 955–973. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borman, W. C. , Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borman, W. C. , Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borman, W. C. , Penner, L. A. , Allen, T. D. , Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 52–69. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowen, F. , Blackmon, K. (2003). Spirals of silence: The dynamic effects of diversity on organizational voice. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1393–1417. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brief, A. P. , Buttram, R. T. , Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brief, A. P. , Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caldwell, S. D. , Farmer, S. M. , Fedor, D. B. (2008). The influence of age on volunteer contributions in a nonprofit organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 311–333. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, J. P. , McCloy, R. A. , Oppler, S. H. , Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In E. Schmitt, W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, J. P. , McHenry, J. J. , Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43, 313–575. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, C.-C. , Chiu, S.-F. (2008). An integrative model linking supervisor support and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 23, 1–10. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chiaburu, D. S. , Marinova, S. V. , Lim, A. S. (2007). Helping and proactive extra-role behaviors: The influence of motives, goal orientation, and social context. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2282–2293. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Choi, J. N. (2007). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 467–484. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christ, O. , van Dick, R. , Wagner, U. , Stellmacher, J. (2003). When teachers go the extra mile: Foci of organisational identification as determinants of different forms of organisational citizenship behaviour among schoolteachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 329–341. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coleman, V. I. , Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25–44. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conway, J. M. (1996). Additional construct validity evidence for the task/contextual performance distinction. Human Performance, 9, 309–329. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435–462. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1241–1255. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Den Hartog, D. N. , Belschak, F. D. (2007). Personal initiative, commitment and affect at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 601–622. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Detert, J. R. , Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869–884. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Donaldson, T. , Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. The Academy of Management Review, 19, 252–284. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Donaldson, T. , Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. (2007). Besonderes Engagement bei der Arbeit. In H. Schuler, K.-H. Sonntag (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (S. 246–253). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Six, B. , Schmook, R. (2005). Die Bedeutung der Arbeitszufriedenheit für Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB). Wirtschaftspsychologie, 7, 49–62. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Finkelstein, M. A. , Penner, L. A. (2004). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior: Integrating the functional and role identity approaches. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 383–398. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frese, M. , Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frese, M. , Kring, W. , Soose, A. , Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37–63. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fuller, J. B. , Marler, L. E. , Hester, K. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1089–1120. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • George, J. M. , Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310–329. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giardini, A. , Frese, M. (2006). Eigeninitiative als positives Verhalten in Organisationen. In M. Ringlstetter, S. Kaiser, G. Müller-Seitz (Hrsg.), Positives Management: Zentrale Konzepte und Ideen des Positive Organizational Scholarship (S. 53–70). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1–52. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 249–270. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harris, M. M. , Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43–62. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hertel, G. , Bretz, E. , Moser, K. (2000). Freiwilliges Arbeitsengagement: Begriffsklärung und Forschungsstand. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 31, 121–140. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffman, B. J. , Blair, C. A. , Meriac, J. P. , Woehr, D. J. (2007). Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 555–566. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kastenmüller, A. , Greitemeyer, T. , Fischer, P. , Frey, D. (2007). Das Münchner Zivilcourage-Instrument (MüZI): Entwicklung und Validierung. Diagnostica, 53, 205–217. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131–146. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kersting, M. , Gehring, F. (2006). Universitary Citizenship Behavior – Die andere Seite des Studienerfolgs. Vortrag auf dem 45. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), Nürnberg. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, J. W. , Choi, J. , Han, K. (2004). Relationship support activities, community commitment, and voluntary behaviour in online communities. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 1, 431–449. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Konovsky, M. A. , Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253–266. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laczo, R. M. (2002). An examination of the dimensionality of non-task-performance. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lam, S. S. K. , Hui, C. , Law, K. S. (1999). Organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing perspectives of supervisors and subordinates across four international samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 594–601. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lavelle, J. J. , Brockner, J. , Konovsky, M. A. , Price, K. H. , Henley, A. B. , Taneja, A. et al. (2009). Commitment, procedural fairness, and organizational citizenship behavior: a multifoci analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 337–357. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Law, K. S. , Wong, C.-S. , Mobley, W. H. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 741–755. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, C. (1995). Prosocial organizational behaviors: The roles of workplace justice, achievement striving, and pay satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 197–206. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LePine, J. A. , Erez, A. , Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52–65. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LePine, J. A. , Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853–868. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lievens, F. , Anseel, F. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis and invariance of an organizational citizenship behaviour measure across samples in a Dutch-speaking context. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 299–306. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lievens, F. , Conway, J. M. , De Corte, W. (2008). The relative importance of task, citizenship and counterproductive performance to job performance ratings: Do rater source and team-based culture matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 11–27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKenzie, S. B. , Podsakoff, P. M. , Fetter, R. (1991). Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons’ performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 123–150. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKenzie, S. B. , Podsakoff, P. M. , Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710–730. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacNab, B. , Brislin, R. , Worthley, R. , Galperin, B. L. , Jenner, S. , Lituchy, T. R. et al. (2007). Culture and Ethics Management: Whistle-blowing and Internal Reporting within a NAFTA Country Context. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7, 5–28. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marcus, B. , Schuler, H. (2006). Leistungsbeurteilung. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (2. Aufl., S. 433–469). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marcus, B. , Schuler, H. , Quell, P. , Hümpfner, G. (2002). Measuring counterproductivity: Development and initial validation of a German self-report questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 18–35. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McAllister, D. J. , Kamdar, D. , Morrison, E. W. , Turban, D. B. (2007). Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1200–1211. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McNeely, B. L. , Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836–844. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mersman, J. L. , Donaldson, S. I. (2000). Factors affecting the convergence of self-peer ratings on contextual and task performance. Human Performance, 13, 299–322. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miceli, M. P. , Near, J. P. (1985). Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions. Personnel Psychology, 38, 525–544. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miles, D. E. , Borman, W. C. , Spector, P. E. , Fox, S. (2002). Building an integrative model of extra role work behaviors: A comparison of counterproductive work behavior with organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 51–57. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moon, H. , Kamdar, D. , Mayer, D. M. , Takeuchi, R. (2008). Me or we? The role of personality and justice as other-centered antecedents to innovative citizenship behaviors within organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 84–94. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543–1567. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morrison, E. W. , Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25, 706–725. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morrison, E. W. , Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. The Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403–419. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Some basic issues related to contextual performance and organizational citizenship behavior in human resource msanagement. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 115–126. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Motowidlo, S. J. , Borman, W. C. , Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71–83. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Motowidlo, S. J. , Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muck, P. M. (2006). Persönlichkeit und berufsbezogenes Sozialverhalten. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (2. Aufl., S. 527–577). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Near, J. P. , Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nerdinger, F. W. (2004). Organizational Citizenship Behavior und Extra-Rollenverhalten. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Organisationspsychologie – Gruppe und Organisation (Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Wirtschafts-, Organisations- und Arbeitspsychologie, Bd. 4, 2. Aufl., S. 293–333). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Reilly, C. , Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ohly, S. , Sonnentag, S. , Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 257–279. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Organ, D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes-performance hypothesis. The Academy of Management Review, 2, 46–53. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85–97. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Passini, S. , Morselli, D. (2009). Authority relationships between obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 96–106. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, N. P. , Whiting, S. W. , Podsakoff, P. M. , Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , Ahearne, M. , MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262–270. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 351–363. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Fetter, R. (1993). Substitutes for leadership and the management of professionals. The Leadership Quarterly, 4, 1–44. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Moorman, R. H. , Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Paine, J. B. , Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poropat, A. E. (2004). An examination of the relationship between personality and citizenship performance in academic and workplace settings. Dissertation, University of Queensland, Brisbane. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rioux, S. M. , Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306–1314. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rotundo, M. , Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sackett, P. R. , DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In D. S. O. N. Anderson, H. K. Sinangil, C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Bd. 1: Personnel psychology, pp. 143–164). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scheele, B. , Kapp, F. (2002). Utopie Zivilcourage: Zur Integration von Fürsorgemoral und öffentlichem Handeln. In Kölner Psychologische Studien (Bd. VII/2002). Köln. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scheithauer, H. , Hayer, T. , Bull, H. D. (2007). Gewalt an Schulen am Beispiel von Bullying. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 141–152. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, R. J. , Goff, M. , Anderson, S. , Borman, W. C. (2003). Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 237–246. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Semmer, N. K. , Elfering, A. , Jacobshagen, N. , Perrot, T. , Beehr, T. A. , Boos, N. (2008). The emotional meaning of instrumental social support. International Journal of Stress Management, 15, 235–251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shapira, Z. , Zevulun, E. (1979). On the use of facet analysis in organizational behavior research: Some conceptual consideration and an example. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 411–428. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shye, S. (1998). Modern facet theory: Content design and measurement in behavioral research. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 160–171. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Skarlicki, D. P. , Latham, G. P. (1996). Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 161–169. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skarlicki, D. P. , Latham, G. P. (1997). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology, 50, 617–633. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, C. A. , Organ, D. W. , Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snape, E. , Redman, T. (2007). The nature and consequences of organization-employee and union-member exchange: An empirical analysis. Journal of Labor Research, 28, 359–374. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518–528. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. (2006). Feuer und Flamme für die Arbeit: Das Konzept des Arbeitsengagements. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 8, 81–86. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. , Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance: A handbook in the psychology of management in organizations (pp. 3–25). Chichester: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spreitzer, G. M. , Sonenshein, S. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 828–847. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Staufenbiel, T. (2000). Antezedentien und Konsequenzen freiwilligen Arbeitsengagements. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 31, 169–183. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Staufenbiel, T. , Hartz, C. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Entwicklung und erste Validierung eines Meßinstruments. Diagnostica, 46, 73–83. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Staw, B. M. , Boettger, R. D. (1990). Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 33, 534–559. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stone-Romero, E. F. , Alvarez, K. , Thompson, L. F. (2009). The construct validity of conceptual and operational definitions of contextual performance and related constructs. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 104–116. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stroebe, W. , Stroebe, M. (1996). The social psychology of social support. In E. T. Higgins, A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 597–621). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Subramani, M. R. , Peddibhotla, N. (2003). Contributing to document repositories: An examination of prosocial behavior (Research Paper). Minnesota: University of Minnesota. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tangirala, S. , Ramanujam, R. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61, 37–68. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turnipseed, D. L. , Wilson, G. L. (2009). From discretionary to required: The migration of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 201–216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Twigg, N. , Fuller, J. , Hester, K. (2008). Transformational leadership in labor organizations: The effects on union citizenship behaviors. Journal of Labor Research, 29, 27–41. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Dick, R. , Wagner, U. , Stellmacher, J. , Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dyne, L. , Ang, S. , Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1359–1392. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dyne, L. , Cummings, L. L. , McLean Parks, J. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215–285. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dyne, L. , Graham, J. W. , Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 765–802. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dyne, L. , LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dyne, L. , VandeWalle, D. , Kostova, T. , Latham, M. E. , Cummings, L. L. (2000). Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 3–23. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Scotter, J. R. , Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525–531. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Scotter, J. R. , Motowidlo, S. J. , Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526–535. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vey, M. A. , Campbell, J. P. (2004). In-role or extra-role organizational citizenship behavior: Which are we measuring? Human Performance, 17, 119–135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006). Compulsory Citizenship Behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 77–93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 377–405. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Viswesvaran, C. , Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216–226. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Viswesvaran, C. , Sanchez, J. I. , Fisher, J. (1999). The role of social support in the process of work stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 314–334. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warren, D. E. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 28, 622–632. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Werner, J. M. (2000). Implications of OCB and contextual performance for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 3–24. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wesche, J. S. , Muck, P. M. (2009, May 13th–16th 2009). Perceived work and organizational characteristics as predictors of three forms of citizenship performance. Paper presented at the 14th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, L. J. , Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, C.-P. , Chu, T.-H. (2007). Exploring knowledge contribution from an OCB perspective. Information & Management, 44, 321–331. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar