Cyber-Mobbing: Eine Bestandsaufnahme
Abstract
Die Nutzung der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie (IKT) hat der Menschheit nicht nur Vorteile gebracht. Ein Nachteil liegt in der Entstehung und der Zunahme von Cyber-Mobbing. Diese besondere Form des Mobbings hat Auswirkungen auf Kinder und Jugendliche aller Altersstufen, Eltern und Lehrkräfte und stellt eine zunehmende Herausforderung für Schulen dar. Dieser Artikel bietet einen Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der Forschung in Bezug auf die Prävalenz und Formen des Cyber-Mobbings, die psychosozialen Korrelate bei Opfern, Tätern und Täter-Opfern sowie Auswirkungen auf Täter und Opfer. Mögliche Wege für Präventionsmaßnahmen und Implikationen für die zukünftige Forschung werden aufgezeigt.
Utilization of information and communication technology (ICT) has not only had positive effects on humankind. One disadvantage is the development and proliferation of cyber-bullying. This special form of bullying is an increasing challenge for schools, affecting children and adolescents of all ages, their parents, and educators. This article is an overview of the current state of research on the prevalence and forms of cyber-bullying. Possible psychosocial correlates in victims, bullies, and bully-victims are described, as well as implications for victims. For school practitioners, avenues for prevention approaches are explored and implications for future research are discussed.
Literatur
2010). Normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator of narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2619 – 2634.
(2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212 – 230.
(2012). Cyberbullying among primary school students in Turkey: Self-reported prevalence and associations with home and school life. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 527 – 533.
(2009). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 803 – 833.
(2010). Short-term longitudinal relationships between children’s peer victimization/bullying experiences and self-perceptions. Evidence for reciprocity. School Psychology International, 31, 296 – 311.
(2012). ‘Under the radar’: Educators and cyberbullying in schools. School Psychology International, 33, 520 – 532.
(2009). Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me?: Students’ experiences with cyber-bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 383 – 402.
(2012). Bullying and cyberbullying: Overlapping and predictive value of the co-occurrence. Psicothema, 24, 608 – 613.
(2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bulling: A theoretical and conceptual review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 182 – 188.
(2012). Spinning our wheels: Improving our ability to respond to bullying and cyberbullying. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 21, 43 – 55.
(2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media Society, 12, 109 – 125.
(2012). Cross-contextual stability of bullying victimization: A person-oriented analysis of cyber and traditional bullying experiences among adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 181 – 190.
(2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 168 – 181.
(2012). Cyber-victimization and popularity in early adolescence: Stability and predictive associations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 228 – 243.
(2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 205 – 213.
(2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 59 – 65.
(2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema, 24, 614 – 620.
(2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
(2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 206 – 221.
(2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 711 – 722.
(2010). Analysis of experts’ and trainers’ views on cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 169 – 181.
(2012). Opfer von Bullying in der Schule. Depressivität, Suizidalität und selbstverletzendes Verhalten bei deutschen Jugendlichen. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 21, 40 – 46.
(2011). Ganging up or sticking together? Group processes and children’s responses to text-message bullying. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 71 – 96.
(2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in internet chat rooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 21, 25 – 36.
(2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 22 – 30.
(2012). Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. School Psychology International, 33, 505 – 519.
(2012). Cyberbullying: The challenge to define. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 285 – 289.
(2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157 – 169.
(2012). Mobbing und Gewalt an Schulen. Entwicklungstrends von 2002 bis 2010. Das Gesundheitswesen, 74, 76-S83.
(2012). Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 455 – 463.
(2012). Online Bullying Among Youth 8 – 17 Worldwide. Retrieved February 22, 2013, from http://www.microsoft.com
(2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 63 – 70.
(2012). The emergence of cyberbullying; a survey of primary school pupils’ perceptions and experiences. School Psychology International, 33, 477 – 491.
(2012). Anonymity and roles associated with aggressive posts in an online forum. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 861 – 867.
(2012). Children’s cyberbullying victimization: associations with social anxiety and social competence in a Spanish sample. Child Indicators Research, 5, 281 – 295.
(2013). Not sticks and stones but tweets and texts: findings from a national cyberbullying project. Pastoral Care in Education, 31, 53 – 65.
(1996). The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Center for Health Promotion, University of Bergen.
(2006). Gewalt in der Schule. Was Lehrer und Eltern wissen sollten–und tun können (4. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.
(2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 520 – 538.
(2010). Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 124 – 134.
(2007). Cuestionario de cyberbullying. Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba (unveröffentlichter Fragebogen).
(2009). The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: A study of Spanish adolescents. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 197 – 204.
(2012). The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: A European cross-national study. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 342 – 356.
(2011). High school students’ perceptions of coping with cyberbullying. Youth Society, 44, 284 – 306.
(2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 80, 614 – 21.
(2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth & Society, 43, 727 – 751.
(2012a). Revisiting cyberbullying in schools using the quality circle approach. School Psychology International, 33, 492 – 504.
(2012b). Investigating legal aspects of cyberbullying. Psicothema, 24, 640 – 645.
(2013). Keyboard gangsters: Analysis of incidence and correlates of cyberbullying in a large urban student population. Deviant Behavior, 34, 68 – 84.
(2006). Social behavior and peer relationships of victims, bully–victims, and bullies in kindergarten. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 45 – 57.
(2002). Klinische Kinderpsychologie: Das Konzept der sozialen Kompetenz. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 210, 175 – 185.
(2011). Prävention. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 20, 197 – 200.
(2013). Störungen des Sozialverhaltens. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 22, 123 – 126.
(2012). Schluss mit Cyber-Mobbing! Das Trainings- und Präventionsprogramm „Surf-Fair”. Weinheim: Beltz.
(2011). The prevalence of cyberbullying among adolescents: A case study of middle schools in Serbia. School Psychology International, 32, 412 – 424.
(2012). Rates of cyber victimization and bullying among male Australian primary and high school students. School Psychology International, 33, 533 – 549.
(2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 171 – 177.
(2012). Cyberbullying bei Schülern und Schülerinnen. Ergebnisbericht einer Online-Studie. Bielefeld: Institut für Interdisziplinäre Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung, Universität Bielefeld.
(2011). School bullying by one or more ways: Does it matter and how do students cope. School Psychology International, 32, 288 – 311.
(2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147 – 154.
(2012). Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by bullies: A pilot study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 244 – 259.
(2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376 – 385.
(2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents. A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 720 – 728.
(2009). Behind the scenes and screens: Insights into the human dimension of covert and cyberbullying. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 189 – 196.
(2012). How stressful is online victimization? Effects of victims personality and properties of the incident. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 260 – 274.
(2012). High school teachers perceptions of cyberbullying prevention and intervention strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 352 – 367.
(2011). Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents’ cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 643 – 648.
(2011). Coping strategies and perceived effectiveness in fourth through eighth grade victims of bullying. School Psychology International, 32, 263 – 287.
(2009). Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1 – 5.
(2012). Police actions with regard to cyberbullying: The Belgian case. Psicothema, 24, 646 – 652.
(2008). Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 499 – 503.
(2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles of bullies and victims. New Media and Society, 11, 1349 – 1371.
(2009a). Bullying an Grundschulen. Formen, Geschlechtsunterschiede und psychosoziale Korrelate. Psychologische Rundschau, 60, 152 – 162.
(2009b). Förderung sozial-emotionaler Kompetenzen im Grundschulalter. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 18, 244 – 253.
(2010). Bullying in German primary schools: Gender differences, age trends and influence of parents’ migration and educational backgrounds. School Psychology International, 31, 178 – 198.
(2012). Cyberbullying: An increasing challenge for schools. School Psychology International, 33, 467 – 476.
(2012). Heterosexual and nonheterosexual young university students’ involvement in traditional and cyber forms of bullying. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 649 – 654.
(2010). Involvement in internet aggression during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 607 – 619.
(2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
(2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 51 – 58.
(2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308 – 1316.
(