Skip to main content
Studie

Retrospektive Evaluation eines interdisziplinären Nachsorgeangebots für suchtmittelexponierte Neugeborene

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0942-5403/a000312

Zusammenfassung. Pränatale Suchtmittelexposition ist ein großer Risikofaktor für organische, neurologische und psychische Entwicklungsstörungen. In der Gesamtstichprobe (N = 84) erfolgte auf Grund der Schwere der Störung bei fast der Hälfte der Kinder eine medikamentöse Behandlung des Neonatalen Entzugssyndroms. 56 Familien nahmen das Nachsorgeangebot im Rahmen einer Kooperation zwischen Geburtsmedizin, Neonatologie und Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie wahr (BK-Gruppe) und 28 erschienen nicht (N-Gruppe). In der N-Gruppe nahmen die Mütter präpartal häufiger Substitutionsmittel ein (p=0,02). Kinder aus der BK-Gruppe erhielten häufiger Unterstützung durch Jugendhilfe (22 %) und wurden seltener (46 %) in den elterlichen Haushalt entlassen (p<0,05). Bei über 80 % der Säuglinge wurde eine Regulationsstörung diagnostiziert. Nach unseren Erfahrungen besteht aufgrund der Vielzahl von Entwicklungsrisiken und psychosozialen Belastungen eine dringliche Indikation zur interdisziplinären Diagnostik und Behandlung aller dieser Neugeborenen.


Retrospective Evaluation of Interdisciplinary Follow-Up Care for Prenatally Drug-Exposed Infants

Abstract. Prenatal drug exposure is a risk factor for organic, neurological, mental, and developmental disorders. It is an important public health issue that comes with many negative short- and long-term consequences. The associated psychosocial burdens and often low adherence to care call for interdisciplinary and intensive follow-up care programs. Such an interdisciplinary monitoring program was implemented for the first time in Germany and exists as a close collaboration between the obstetrics, neonatology, and child and adolescent psychiatric departments of a university hospital. The aim of the current retrospective observation study is to give a descriptive evaluation of this newly established follow-up care program. A total of 84 women were monitored during pregnancy by the obstetrics department, gave birth in the collaborating neonatology unit, and were offered a follow-up appointment in the infant psychiatric unit. Almost two thirds of the families (n = 56) showed up for the follow-up care appointment (BI sample) and 28 families did not (N sample). Of the overall sample, 98 % of the infants were diagnosed with neonatal abstinence syndrome at birth. Subsequently, almost half (49 %) were treated pharmaceutically for their withdrawal symptoms; 4 % of infants immediately received a diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. A retrospective comparison between the BI and N sample revealed that the mothers of the N sample significantly more often took pharmaceutical replacement therapy prepartum (p = .016). Support by child services was needed significantly more often in the BI sample (22 %) and 45.5 % of cases were not discharged into parental care (p < .50). Over 80 % of infants in the BI sample were diagnosed with a regulation disorder of sensory processing. On average the families in the BI sample participated in two follow-up appointments. Overall, these results show for the first time in Germany the value and practical feasibility of an interdisciplinary follow-up care program for prenatally drug-exposed infants. At the same time, clinical professionals have to adjust the care to the often reduced time management skills, limited insight, low concentration levels, and heightened psychosocial burdens of these families. Moreover, it is vital to include all the different parties during the follow-up process, for example, child services and/or pediatrician. Due to the high variety and cumulative nature of the associated developmental risks of prenatal drug exposure, a clear indication for interdisciplinary diagnostics, counseling, and treatment of these vulnerable infants is given. Further longitudinal studies are required to identify the effects of single as well as poly drug use on the different developmental stages in order to adjust follow-up care programs to the specific needs over the entire course of a child’s development well into adulthood.

Literatur

  • Ahn, R. R., Miller, L. J., Milberger, S. & McIntosh, D. N. (2004). Prevalence of parents’ perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 287 – 293. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). – Steuergruppe A. von Gontard, E. Möhler, C. Bindt (2015). Leitlinien zu psychischen Störungen im Säuglings-, Kleinkind- und Vorschulalter (S2k). Verfügbar unter: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/028-041l_S2k_Psychische_Stoerungen_Saeugling_Kleinkind_Vorschulalter_2017-10.pdf [06.08.2018]. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Behnke, M. & Smith, V. C. (2013). Prenatal substance abuse: Short- and long-term effects on the exposed fetus. Pediatrics, 131 – 1024., e1009. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bergmann, K. E., Bergmann, R. L., Ellert, U. & Dudenhausen, J. W. (2007). Perinatale Einflussfaktoren auf die spätere Gesundheit. Ergebnisse des Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurveys (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz, 50, 670 – 676. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Biringen, Z. (2000). Emotional availability: Conceptualization and research findings. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70, 104 – 14. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drogenbeauftragte der Bundesregierung (2015). Drogen- und Suchtbericht. Mai 2015. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, W. (2007). Supporting children to participate successfully in everyday life by using sensory processing knowledge. Infants & Young Children, 20, 84 – 101. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elstner, T., Fiala-Preinsperger, S. & Berger, E. (2006). Entwicklungsbegleitung von Kindern substanzabhängiger Mütter – das Wiener Comprehensive Care Modell. Neuropsychiatrie, 20, 109 – 17. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Emde, R. N. & Easterbrooks, M. (1985). Assessing emotional availability in early development. In W. K. FrankenburgR. N. EmdeJ. W. Sullivan (Eds.), Early identification of children at risk. Topics in developmental psychobiology (pp. 79 – 101). Boston, MA: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (2018). Preventing later substance use disorders in at-risk children and adolescents: A review of the theory and evidence base of indicated prevention. Verfügbar unter: www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/thematic-papers/indicated-prevention [06. 08. 2018]. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Equit, M., Paulus, F., Fuhrmann, P., Niemczyk, J. & Gontard, A. von (2011). Comparison of ICD-10 and DC: 0 – 3R Diagnoses in infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 42, 623 – 33. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Finnegan, L., Connaughton, J., Kron, R. & Emich, J. (1975). Neonatal abstinence syndrome: Assessment and management. Addictive diseases, 2, 141 – 58. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Glaas, A., Rudolph, S., Ludwig, J., Pietzner, D., Lubowicka, M., Cook, M. et al. (2017). Developmental testing with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III. Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, 17, 178 – 84. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gortner, L. (2017). Langzeitkonsequenzen der intrauterinen Drogenexposition. In L. GortnerJ. W. Dudenhausen (Hrsg.), Betreuung drogenabhängiger Schwangerer und ihrer Neugeborenen (S. 9 – 20). München: Springer Medizin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gortner, L. & Meyer, S. (2018). Langzeitkonsequenzen der intrauterinen Drogenexposition. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe & Neonatologie, 222 (1), 13 – 18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kooperationsvereinbarung über vernetzte Fallarbeit vom 05.06.2009 (Version 2) zwischen den Berliner Bezirken Mitte, Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf, Reinickendorf und der Charité. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kraus, L., Pabst, A., Gomes de Matos, E. & Piontek, D. (2014). Kurzbericht Epidemiologischer Suchtsurvey 2012. München: IFT Institut für Therapieforschung. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lester, B. M., Andreozzi, L. & Appiah, L. (2004). Substance use during pregnancy: Time for policy to catch up with research. Harm Reduction Journal, 1, 5. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Levy, M. & Spino, M. (1993). Neonatal withdrawal syndrome: Associated drugs and pharmacologic management. Pharmacotherapy, 13, 202 – 211. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McGlone, L. & Mactier, H. (2015). Infants of opioid-dependent mothers: Neurodevelopment at six months. Early Human Development, 91, 19 – 21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McQueen, K. A., Murphy-Oikonen, J. & Desaulniers, L. (2015). Maternal substance use and neonatal abstinence syndrome: A descriptive study. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19, 1756 – 1765. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Minnes, S., Min, M. O., Kim, J., Francis M. W., Lang, A., Wu, M. et al. (2017). The association of prenatal cocaine exposure, externalizing behavior and adolescent substance use. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 176, 33 – 43. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mohandes, A., Herman, A., Nabil El-Khorazaty, M., Katta, P., White, D. & Grylack, L. (2003). Prenatal care reduces the impact of illicit drug use on perinatal outcomes. Journal of Perinatology, 23, 354 – 360. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mücke, S. (2017). Diagnostik und Therapie bei Kindern drogenabhängiger Mütter. In L. GortnerJ. W. Dudenhausen (Hrsg.), Betreuung drogenabhängiger Schwangerer und ihrer Neugeborenen (S. 66 – 82). München: Springer Medizin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nagel, M. (2017). Interprofessionelle und interdisziplinäre Betreuung drogenabhängiger Schwangerer. In L. GortnerJ. W. Dudenhausen (Hrsg.), Betreuung drogenabhängiger Schwangerer und ihrer Neugeborenen (S. 55 – 65). München: Springer Medizin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Narkowicz, S., Plotka, J., Polkowska, Z., Biziuk, M. & Namiesnik, J. (2013). Prenatal exposure to substance of abuse: A worldwide problem. Environment, 54, 141 – 163. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Papousek, M., Schieche, M. & Wurmser, M. (2004). Regulationsstörungen der frühen Kindheit – Frühe Risiken und Hilfen im Entwicklungskontext der Eltern-Kind-Beziehungen. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reuner, G., Rosenkranz, J., Pietz, J. & Horn, R. (2007). Deutsche Adaptation der Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (6th ed.). Frankfurt: Pearson Assessment. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Römer, P., Reinelt, T., Petermann, F. & Teickner, C. (2019). Alkoholkonsum während der Schwangerschaft. Welche Auswirkungen auf die frühkindliche Entwicklung sind bekannt? Kindheit und Entwicklung, 28, 6 – 18. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rushton, L. (2004). Health impact of environmental tobacco smoke in the home. Reviews on Environmental Health, 19, 291 – 309. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Siedentopf, J. P. & Nagel, M. (2017). Versorgung suchtmittelkonsumierender Schwangerer in Berlin. Thüringer Ärzteblatt, 10, 563 – 6. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spohr, H. L. & Steinhausen, H. C. (2008). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and their persisting sequelae in adult life. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 105, 693 – 698. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steinhausen, H. C., Mas, S., Ledermann, C. & Metzke, C. (2006). Risk factors for the development of emotional and behavioural problems in children born to drug-dependent mothers. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 15, 460 – 466. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vasquez, E., Pitts, K. & Mejia, N. (2008). A model program: Neonatal nurse practitioners providing community health care for high-risk infants. Neonatal Network, 27, 163 – 169. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Viteri, O., Soto, E., Bahado-Singh, R., Christensen, C., Chauhan, S. & Sibai, B. (2015). Fetal anomalies and long-term effects associated with substance abuse in pregnancy: A literature review. American Journal of Perinatology, 32, 405 – 416. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Voigt, M., Fusch, C., Olbertz, D., Hartmann, K., Rochow, N., Renken, C. et al. (2006). Analyse des Neugeborenenkollektivs der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 12. Mitteilung: Vorstellung engmaschiger Perzentilwerte (–kurven) für die Körpermaße Neugeborener. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 66, 956 – 970. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiefel, A., Titze, K., Kuntze, L., Winter, M., Seither, C., Witte, B. et al. (2007). Diagnostik und Klassifikation von Verhaltensauffälligkeiten bei Säuglingen und Kleinkindern von 0 – 5 Jahren. Praxis für Kinderpsychologie & Kinderpsychiatrie, 56, 59 – 81. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • World Medical Association (WMA). (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310, 2191 – 2194. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zero To Three (2005). Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood: Revised Edition (DC:0 – 3R). Washington, DC: Zero To Three Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmermann-Baer, U., Notzli, U., Rentsch, K. & Bucher, H. (2010). Finnegan neonatal abstinence scoring system: Normal values for first 3 days and weeks 5 – 6 in non-addicted infants. Addiction, 105, 524 – 528. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar