Skip to main content
Originalarbeit

Co-Rumination im Kontext des sozio-interpersonellen Modells der PTBS

Eine Studie mit Einsatzkräften

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000359

Zusammenfassung.Theoretischer Hintergrund: Die Arbeit der Einsatzkräfte verschiedener Berufsgruppen (Feuerwehrleute, Polizei und Rettungspersonal) kann zu einer sekundären Traumatisierung führen. Das sozio-interpersonelle Model der PTBS von Maercker und Horn (2013) unterstreicht die Wichtigkeit des sozio-interpersonellen Kontexts für Traumafolgephänomene. In der vorliegenden Studie wurden entsprechend die Zusammenhänge zwischen sekundärer PTBS und erlebter gesellschaftlicher Wertschätzung, dysfunktionalen Mustern beim Offenlegen von traumatischen Inhalten (Disclosure) sowie Co-Rumination in einer russischsprachigen Population untersucht. Co-Rumination, das parallel zum intrapsychischen Ruminieren für das Wiederholen negativer Inhalte im Dialog mit anderen steht, wurde bisher noch nicht im Kontext von Traumaverarbeitung erforscht. Fragestellung: Ziel der Studie ist es zu untersuchen, ob Co-Rumination als interpersoneller Prozess zusätzlich zu den bekannten sozio-interpersonellen Variablen Disclosure und gesellschaftlicher Wertschätzung mit erhöhter post-traumatische Symptomatik assoziiert ist. Methode: Es wurden N = 168 Einsatzkräften in Weißrussland mit Hilfe von Fragebögen zu ihrer Symptomatik sowie den interessierenden sozio-interpersonellen Variablen befragt. Ergebnisse: Die in die Regressionsanalyse einbezogenen Prädiktorvariablen klärten insgesamt bis zu 50.4 % Varianz der sekundären Traumatisierung auf. Die Variable Co-Rumination klärte zusätzlich 2 % der Gesamtvarianz auf. Schlussfolgerung: Extensiver und wiederkehrender sozialer Austausch von negativen Inhalten, sogenannte Co-Rumination, ist in der Verarbeitung von traumatischen Erlebnissen mit erhöhter Symptomatik assoziiert und erweist sich dabei als von Disclosure und erlebter gesellschaftlicher Wertschätzung empirisch unterscheidbar.


Corumination in the Context of the Socio-Interpersonal Model of PTSD: A Study With Rescue Workers

Abstract.Background: The work of rescue workers (firefighters, police, and emergency medical workers) may lead to secondary traumatization. Following the socio-interpersonal model of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by Maercker and Horn (2013), the association of secondary PTSD symptoms with social acknowledgment, dysfunctional disclosure, and corumination was investigated in a Russian-speaking population. Corumination is the repetitive focus on negative content in dialogue, which so far has not been studied in the context of posttraumatic symptoms. Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate whether corumination, as a maladaptive interpersonal process, predicts symptoms of PTSD additionally to the known relevant socio-interpersonal variables such as dysfunctional disclosure and social acknowledgment. Method: In all, N = 168 rescue workers in Belarus filled out questionnaires on socio-interpersonal variables and secondary PTSD symptoms. Results: Corumination was significantly associated with secondary traumatization. All the socio-interpersonal risk factors together explained up to 50 % of the variance for secondary traumatization, while 2 % of variance was explained by corumination. Conclusion: The disclosure of traumatic events and the excessive discussion as well as extensive and recurrent speculation about problems between colleagues, along with a focus on negative feelings – so-called corumination – are associated with maladaptive processing of traumatic experiences.

Literatur

  • Abresch, K. & Bering, R. (2009, June). PTSD following a terrorist attack – a meta-analysis on possible risk factors. Poster presented at the XI European Conference on Traumatic Stress, Oslo. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Belsher, B. E., Ruzek, J. I., Bongar, B. & Cordova, M. J. (2012). Social constraints, posttraumatic cognitions, and posttraumatic stress disorder in treatment-seeking trauma survivors: Evidence for a social-cognitive processing model. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4, 386 – 391. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bering, R. (2005). Verlauf der Posttraumatischen Belastungsstörung. Grundlagenforschung, Prävention, Behandlung. Aachen: Schaker. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B. & Valentine, J. D. (2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 748 – 766. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Calmes, C. A. & Roberts, J. E. (2008). Rumination in interpersonal relationships: Does Co-Rumination explain gender differences in emotional distress and relationship satisfaction among college students? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 577 – 590. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Capraro, R. M. & Capraro, M. M. (2001). Commonality Analysis: Understanding Variance Contributions to Overall Canonical Correlation Effects of Attitude Toward Mathematics on Geometry Achievement. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 27 (2), 17 – 23. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ciesla, J. A., Dickson, K. S., Anderson, N. L. & Neal, D. J. (2011). Negative Repetitive Thought and College Drinking: Angry Rumination, Depressive Rumination, Co-Rumination, and Worry. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35, 142 – 150. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corneil, W., Beaton, R., Murphy, S., Johnson, C. & Pike, K. (1999). Exposure to traumatic incidents and prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptomatology in urban firefighters in two countries. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 131 – 141. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Curci, A. & Rime, B. (2012). The temporal evolution of social sharing of emotions and its consequences on emotional recovery: a longitudinal study. Emotion, 12, 1404 – 1414. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davidson, A. C. & Moss, S. A. (2008). Examining the trauma disclosure of police officers to their partners and officers’ subsequent adjustment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27 (1), 51 – 70. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dekel, R. & Solomon, Z. (2006). Secondary traumatization among wives of Israeli POWs: The role of POWs’ distress. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41 (1), 27 – 33. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dindia, K. & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dyregrov, A. (1998). Psychological Debriefing – An Effective Method? Traumatology, 4 (2), 6 – 15. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eriksson, C.B., Vande Kemp, H., Gorsuch, R., Hoke, S. & Foy, D.W. (2001). Trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms in international relief and development personnel. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 205 – 212. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frattaroli, J. (2006). Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 823 – 865. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fullerton, C. S., Ursano, R. J., Vance, K. & Wang, L. (2000). Debriefing following trauma. Psychiatric Quarterly, 71, 259 – 276. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoyt, T., Pasupathi, M., Smith, B. W., Yeater, E. A., Kay, V. S. & Tooley, E. (2010). Disclosure of emotional events in groups at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder. International Journal of Stress Management, 17 (1), 78 – 95. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maercker, A. (Hrsg.). (2009). Posttraumatische Belastungsstörungen. Heidelberg: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maercker, A. & Horn, A. (2013). A socio-interpersonal perspective on PTBS: the case for environments and interpersonal processes. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 20, 465 – 481. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maercker, A. & Müller, J. (2004). Social acknowledgment as a victim or survivor: a scale to measure a recovery factor of PTSD. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 345 – 351. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maercker, A., Povilonyte, M., Lianova, R. & Pohlmann, K. (2009). Is acknowledgment of trauma a protective factor? The sample case of refugees from Chechnya. European Psychologist, 14, 249 – 254. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Mitchell, J. T. & Everly, G. S. J. (1995). The critical incident stress debriefing (CISD) and the prevention of work-related traumatic stress among high risk occupational groups. In G. S. J. EverlyJ. M. LatingHrsg., Psychotraumatology: Key papers and core concepts in posttraumatic stress (S. 267 – 280). New York: Plenum Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mitte, K., Steil, R. & Nachtigall, C. (2005). Eine Meta-Analyse unter Einsatz des Random-Effects-Modells zur Effektivität kurzfristiger psychologischer Interventionen nach akuter Traumatisierung. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 34, 1 – 9. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Motta, R. W. & Joseph, J. M. (1998). The Secondary Trauma Questionnaire. Unpublished Scale. New York: Hofstra University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Motta, R. W., Newman, C. L., Lombardo, K. L. & Silverman, M. A. (2004). Objective Assessment of Secondary Trauma. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 6 (2), 67 – 74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, J., Beauducel, A., Raschka, J. & Maercker, A. (2000). Kommunikationsverhalten nach politischer Haft in der DDR – Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zum Offenlegen der Traumaerfahrungen [Communication after political imprisonment: disclosure of the traumatic experiences]. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 8, 413 – 427. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, J. & Maercker, A. (2006). Disclosure und wahrgenommene gesellschaftliche Wertschätzung als Opfer als Prädiktoren von PTB bei Kriminalitätsopfern. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 35, 49 – 58. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, J., Mörgeli, H. & Maercker, A. (2008). Disclosure and social acknowledgement as predictors of recovery from posttraumatic stress: A longitudinal study in crime victims. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 160 – 168. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nachtigall, C., Mitte, K. & Steil, R. (2003). Zur Vorbeugung posttraumatischer Symptomatik nach einer Traumatisierung: Eine Meta-Analyse zur Wirksamkeit kurzfristiger Interventionen. Verhaltenstherapie und psychosoziale Praxis, 35, 273 – 281. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L. & Weiss, D. S. (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129 (1), 52 – 73. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction (second edition). Forth Worth, TX: Наrcourt Brace Jovanovich. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 539 – 548. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pielmaier, L. & Maercker, A. (2011). Psychological adaptation to life-threatening injury in dyads: The role of dysfunctional disclosure of trauma. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 2, 1 – 12. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ploeg, E. van der & Kleber, R. J. (2003). Acute and chronic job stressors among ambulance personnel: predictors of health symptoms. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60 (1), 40 – 46. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Purves, D. G. & Erwin, P. G. (2004). Post-traumatic stress and self-disclosure. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 138 (1), 23 – 33. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Regehr, C., Hill, J. A. & Glancy, G. (2000) Individual Predictors of Traumatic Reactions in Firefighters. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 188, 333 – 339. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rose, A. J. (2002). Co-Rumination in the Friendships of Girls and Boys. Child Development, 73, 1830 – 1843. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rose, A. J., Carlson, W. & Waller, E. M. (2007). Prospective associations of Co-Rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: Considering the socioemotional trade-offs of Co-Rumination. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1019 – 1031. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruggiero, K. J., Smith, D. W., Hanson, R. F., Resnick, H. S., Saunders, B. E. & Kilpatrick, D. G. et al. (2004). Is disclosure of childhood rape associated with mental health outcome? Results from the National Women’s Study. Child Maltreatment, 9 (1), 62 – 77. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sloan, D. M., Marx, B. P. & Epstein, E. M. (2005). Further examination of the exposure model underlying the efficacy of written emotional disclosure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 549 – 554. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, T. C., Ryan, A. K., Wingard, D. L., Slymen, D. J., Sallis, J. F. & Kritz-Silverstein, D. (2008). New onset and persistent symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder self reported after deployment and combat exposures: Prospective population based US military cohort study. British Medical Journal, 336, 366 – 371. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smyth, J. M., Hockemeyer, J. R. & Tulloch, H. (2008). Expressive writing and post-traumatic stress disorder: Effects on trauma symptoms, mood states, and cortisol reactivity. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 85 – 93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stephens, C. & Long, N. (1999). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the New Zealand police: The moderating role of social support following traumatic stress. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 12, 247 – 264. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teegen, F. & Yasui, Y. (2000). Traumaexposition und posttraumatische Belastungsstörungen bei dem Personal von Rettungsdiensten. Verhaltenstherapie und Verhaltensmedizin, 21 (1), 65 – 83. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ullman, S. E. (2003). Social reactions to child sexual abuse disclosures: A critical review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 12, 89 – 121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ullman, S. E. & Filipas, H. H. (2005). Gender differences in social reactions to abuse disclosure, post-abuse coping, disclosure, social reactions, and PTBS symptoms in child sexual abuse survivors. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29, 767 – 782. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, D., Heinrichs, M. & Ehlert, U. (1998). Prevalence of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in German professional firefighters. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1727 – 1732. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, D., Heinrichs, M. & Ehlert, U. (1999). Primare und sekundäre Posttraumatische Belastungsstörung: Untersuchungsbefunde bei Hochrisikopopulationen und Implikationen für die Prävention. Psychomed, 1, 31 – 39. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weiss, D. S. & Marmar, C. R. (1997). The Impact of Event Scale – Revised. In J. P. WilsonT. M. KeaneEd., Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 399 – 411). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar