Skip to main content
Schwerpunktbeitrag

Metaanalyse zur Wirksamkeit von Bildungs- und Förderaktivitäten mit digitalen Medien in Kindertageseinrichtungen

Welche Bedeutung kommt dem Ansatz des Medieneinsatzes, der Rolle der Fachkraft und der Unterstützung der Fachkraft bei der Implementierung zu?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/2191-9186/a000562

Zusammenfassung. Digitale Medien sind im Kindesalter allgegenwärtig und so ist auch ihr Einsatz in der frühkindlichen Bildung mittlerweile in Bildungs- und Orientierungsplänen für Praxis und Ausbildung verankert. Die Metaanalyse untersucht die Wirksamkeit von Bildungs- und Förderaktivitäten mit digitalen Medien in Kindertageseinrichtungen auf kindliche Lernprozesse. Dabei nimmt sie insbesondere den Ansatz des Medieneinsatzes (isolierte, eigenständige App-Nutzung vs. curricular eingebettete App-Nutzung), die Rolle der Fachkraft bei der Mediennutzung (nur organisatorisch vs. supervisorisch vs. aktiv begleitend) und die professionelle Unterstützung der Fachkräfte bei der Implementierung als potentielle Moderatoren in den Blick. Durch eine systematische Literatursuche wurden 21 Studien mit 24 verschiedenen Maßnahmen gefunden. In die Berechnung gingen Entwicklungsdaten von 3911 4- bis 6-Jährigen ein. Es fand sich ein klein- bis mittelgroßer positiver Gesamteffekt von g = 0.45 auf kindliches Lernen. Als ähnlich wirksam erwiesen sich (1) die isolierte eigenständige Nutzung von digitalen Lernmedien (z.B. Apps), die kognitions- und lernpsychologische Kriterien erfüllen, durch Kinder in der Kita (g = 0.44) sowie (2) die curricular eingebettete Nutzung digitaler Lernmedien zum gemeinsamen Lernen in der Kita (g = 0.44). Entscheidende Moderatoren waren die Rolle der Fachkräfte sowie ihre Unterstützung beim digitalen Medieneinsatz. Für die Praxis bedeuten diese Befunde, dass zwischen zwei unterschiedlichen Ansätzen des Medieneinsatzes gewählt werden kann. Die Wahl eines Ansatzes sollte sich nach der Rolle der Fachkraft, der Unterstützung der Fachkraft bei der Implementierung und dem Ziel des Medieneinsatzes richten. Die Befunde beziehen sich überwiegend auf nach lernpsychologischen Erkenntnissen entwickelten Apps (forscherbasierte Apps/Bildungsprogramme), nicht hingegen auf kommerziell erwerbbare Apps.


Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of ICT-Based Learning Activities in Early Childhood Education and Care. Impact of Classroom Implementation, Teacher Role, and Teacher Professional Development

Abstract. With digital media now ubiquitous in the daily life of young children, digital competence has become part of the curricula of both early childhood education and care (ECEC) and teacher training. This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of digital learning activities in preschool and kindergarten, using class implementation, role of the teacher, and teacher professional development as potential effect modifiers. In a systematic search, we found 21 studies with 24 different interventions and included overall data from 3,911 children. The research synthesis revealed a small-to-medium effect (g = 0.45) of learning activities with digital media in ECEC. Child development was effectively fostered in two ways: (1) isolated use of well-developed educational information and communication technology (ICT)-based activities (e.g., apps) for independent and self-paced learning and (2) interactive ICT-enriched activities integrated into the daily curriculum and implemented by well-qualified teachers. The impact was moderated by the teacher's role and by whether or not teachers had undergone individual training to support implementation. These findings offer practitioners the choice between two effective implementation methods for ICT in their classrooms. Teacher role, support for teacher implementation, and the learning goals need to be considered when selecting a method. The current state of the art is based mainly on apps that rely on cognitive psychology insights (researcher-developed/educational applications) rather than commercially available apps.

Literatur *In die Metaanalyse eingeschlossene Studien

  • Bastian, J., Aufenanger, S., & Daumann, H.-U. (2018). KiTab.rlp – Medienbildung mit Tablets in der Kita. merz (2), 21–27. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bitner, N., & Bitner, J. (2002). Integrating technology into the classroom: Eight keys to success. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 95–100. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper L. V. Hedges J. C. Valentine Eds., The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (S.221–235). New York: Russel Sage Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2014). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) Version 3. Englewood: Biostat. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Brown, M., & Towle Harmon, M. (2013). IPad intervention with at-risk preschoolers: Mobile technology in the classroom. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 14(2), 56–78. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Cassady, J. C., & Smith, L. L. (2003). The impact of a reading-focused integrated learning system on phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(4), 947–964. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3504_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, F., & Hemmerich, F. (2020). Nutzung digitaler Medien für die pädagogische Arbeit in der Kindertagesbetreuung. Kurzexpertise im Auftrag des BMFSFJ. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cordes, A.-K., Egert, F., & Hartig, F. (2020). Apps für Kindergartenkinder: Lernen oder Aufmerksamkeitsraub? Anforderungen an Lernapps aus kognitionspsychologischer Perspektive. Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung, 3, 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3224/diskurs.v15i3.02 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Cubelic, C., & Larwin, K. H. (2014). The use of ipad technology in the kindergarten classroom: A quasi-experimental investigation of the impact on early literacy skills. Comprehensive Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 47–59. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2012). Teachers enacting a technology-rich curriculum for emergent literacy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9208-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deutscher Bundestag (2018). Zu den Auswirkungen der Nutzung digitaler Medien auf Kleinkinder in Kindertageseinrichtungen. Sachstand. Aktzenzeichen WD9 -300-050/18. Deutscher Bundestag. Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Fernández-Molina, M., Trella, M., & Barros, B. (2015). Experiences with tasks supported by a cognitive e-learning system in preschool: Modelling and training on working memory and attentional control. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 75, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.11.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friedrichs-Liesenkötter, H. (2019). ‚Wo Medienbildung draufsteht, steckt nicht unbedingt Medienbildung drin‘ Eine Dokumentenanalyse von Bildungsplänen und curricula in Ausbildung und Studium zur frühkindlichen Medienbildung und -erziehung. Medienimpulse, 57(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.21243/mi-01-19-07 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Furman, M., De Angelis, S., Dominguez Prost, E., & Taylor, I. (2018). Tablets as an educational tool for enhancing preschool science. International Journal of Early Years Education, 27(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1439368 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hedges, L. V. (2009). Effect sizes in studies with nested designs. In H. Cooper L. V. Hedges J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Gómez, F., Nussbaum, M., Weitz, J. F., Lopez, X., Mena, J., & Torres, A. (2013). Co-located single display collaborative learning for early childhood education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9168-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Huffstetter, M., King, J. R., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Schneider, J. J., & Powell-Smith, K. A. (2010). Effects of a computer-based Early Reading Program on the early reading and oral language skills of at-risk preschool children. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 15(4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2010.532415 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Ihmeideh, F. M. (2014). The effect of electronic books on enhancing emergent literacy skills of pre-school children. Computers & Education, 79, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach (2015). Digitale Medien in Grundschule und Kindergarten. Online verfügbar unter: https://www.telekom-stiftung.de/sites/default/files/files/media/publications/ergebnisse_allensbach-umfrage_gesamt.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Klein, P. S., Nir-Gal, O., & Darom, E. (2000). The use of computers in kindergarten, with or without adult mediation; Effects on children›s cognitive performance and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(6), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00027-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Kocaman-Karoglu, A. (2015). Telling stories digitally: An experiment with preschool children. Educational Media International, 52(4), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1100391 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kultusministerkonferenz (2012). Länderübergreifender Lehrplan Erzieherin/Erzieher. https://www.boefae.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/laenderuebergr-Lehrplan-Endversion.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Llorente, C., Pasnik, S., Moorthy, S., Hupert, N., Rosenfeld, D., & Gerard, S. (2015). Preschool teachers can use a PBS KIDS Transmedia Curriculum Supplement to support young children›s mathematics learning: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Paper presented at the SREE Spring 2015 Conference, Washington, DC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562360.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Macaruso, P., & Rodman, A. (2011a). Benefits of computer-assisted instruction to support reading acquisition in English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.622829 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Macaruso, P., & Rodman, A. (2011b). Efficacy of computer-assisted instruction for the development of early literacy skills in young children. Reading Psychology, 32(2), 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711003608071 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Macaruso, P., & Walker, A. (2008). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction for advancing literacy skills in kindergarten children. Reading Psychology, 29(3), 266–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801982019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer Ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (Vol. 41, pp.31–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (2021). miniKIM 2020 – Kleinkinder und Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 2- bis 5-Jähriger in Deutschland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, M., Zosh, J. M., McLaren, C., Robb, M., McCafferty, H., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Radesky, J. (2021). How educational are “educational” apps for young children? App store content analysis using the Four Pillars of Learning framework, Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 526–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1882516 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Mustafa, G., Abbas, M. A., Hafeez, Y., Khan, S., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Effectiveness of ontology-based learning content generation for preschool cognitive skills learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 443–457. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Nir-Gal, O., & Klein, P. S. (2004). Computers for cognitive development in early childhoo d – The teacher›s role in the computer learning environment. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 16(1), 97–119. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * O›Callaghan, P., McIvor, A., McVeigh, C., & Rushe, T. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of an early-intervention, computer-based literacy program to boost phonological skills in 4-to 6-year-old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12122 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Penuel, W., Bates, L., Gallagher, L., Pasnik, S., Llorente, C., Townsend, E., … VanderBorght, M. (2012). Supplementing literacy instruction with a media-rich intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.07.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Presser, A. L., Vahey, P., & Dominguez, X. (2015). Improving mathematics learning by integrating curricular activities with innovative and developmentally appropriate digital apps: Findings from the Next Generation Preschool Math evaluation. Paper presented at the SREE Spring 2015 Conference, Washington, DC. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reichert-Garschhammer, E. (2020). Nutzung digitaler Medien für die pädagogische Arbeit in der Kindertagesbetreuung. Expertise des IFP im Auftrag des BMFSFJ. Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • * Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2017). Improving preschoolers› mathematics achievement with tablets: A randomized controlled trial. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0203-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • * Shawareb, A. (2011). The effects of computer use on creative thinking among kindergarten children in Jordan. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(4), 213–220. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2014). Can the computer replace the adult for storybook reading? A meta-analysis on the effects of multimedia stories as compared to sharing print stories with an adult. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01366 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698–739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314566989 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Perparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A systhesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59, 134–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zomer, R. N., & Kay, R. H. (2016). Technology use in early childhood education: A review of literature. Journal of Educational Informatics, 1, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.51357/jei.v1i1.45 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zucker, T. A., Moody, A. K., & McKenna, M. C. (2009). The effects of electronic books on pre-kindergarten-to-grade 5 students› literacy and language outcomes: A research synthesis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 47–87. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar