Abstract
Summary: The two main sources of errors in educational and psychological evaluation are the lack of adequate technical and psychometric characteristics of the tests, and especially the failure to properly implement the testing process. The main goal of the present research is to study the situation of test construction and test use in the Spanish-speaking (Spain and Latin American countries) and Portuguese-speaking (Portugal and Brazil) countries. The data were collected using a questionnaire constructed by the European Federation of Professional Psychologists Association (EFPPA) Task Force on Tests and Testing, under the direction of D. Bartram. In addition to the questionnaire, other ad hoc data were also gathered. Four main areas of psychological testing were investigated: Educational, Clinical, Forensic and Work. Key persons were identified in each country in order to provide reliable information. The main results are presented, and some measures that could be taken in order to improve the current testing practices in the countries surveyed are discussed. As most of the tests used in these countries were originally developed in other cultures, a problem that appears to be especially relevant is the translation and adaptation of tests.
References
References
Almeida, L.S. (1993). Princípios deontológicos no uso dos testes e na avaliaçao psicológica. In L.S. Almeida & I.S. Ribeiro (Eds.), Avaliaçao psicológica: Formas e contextos (pp. 155-175). Braga: Associaçao dos Psicólogos Portugueses (APPORT)Almeida, L.S. Gonçalves, M.M. Simoes, M.R. (1995). Provas psicológicas em Portugal: Situaçao actual, limitaçoes e desafios. In L.S. Almeida, M.R. Simoes, & M.M. Gonçalves (Eds.), Provas psicológicas em Portugal (pp. 1-9). Braga: Associaçao dos Psicólogos Portugueses (APPORT)(1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Anastasi, A. (1987). What test users should know about the interpretation of test scores . Keynote address at Joint Committee on Testing Practices Second Test Publishers Conference, Rockville, Maryland. (Cited after Fremer, 1996)Bartram, D. (1996). Tests qualifications and test use in UK: the competence approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 62– 71Bartram, D. Coyne, I. (1998a). The ITC/EFPPA survey of testing and test use in countries world-wide . Technical report for the ITC CouncilBartram, D. Coyne, I. (1998b). The ITC/EFPPA survey of testing and test use in countries within Europe . Technical report for the EFPPA Task ForceCronbach, L.J. (1975). Five decades of public controversy over mental testing. American Psychologist, 30, 1– 14Cuesta, M. Muñiz, J. (1999). Robustness of item response logistic models to violations of the unidimensionality assumption. Psicothema, 11, 175– 182Evers, A. (1996). Regulations concerning test qualifications and test use in The Netherlands. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 153– 159Eyde, L.D. Primoff, E.S. (1992). Responsible test use. In M. Zeidner & R. Most (Eds.), Psychological testing: An inside view (pp. 441-459). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists PressEyde, L.D. Robertson, G.J. Krug, S.E. et al. (1993). Responsible test use: Case studies for assessing human behavior . Washington DC: American Psychological AssociationFidalgo, A.M. Mellenbergh, G.J. Muñiz, J. (1998). Comparación del procedimiento Mantel-Haenszel frente a los modelos loglineales en la detección del funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems. Psicothema, 10, 209– 218Fremer, J. (1996). Promoting high standards for test use: Developments in the United States. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 160– 168Hambleton, R.K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: a progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229– 244Hambleton, R.K. (1996). Adaptación de tests para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. In J. Muñiz (Ed.), Psicometría (pp. 207-238). Madrid: UniversitasMcAllister, P.H. (1991). Overview of state legislation to regulate standardized testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10, 19– 22Moreland, K.L. Eyde, L.D. Robertson, G.J. Primoff, E.S. Most, R.B. (1995). Assessment of test user qualifications. American Psychologist, 5, 14– 23Muñiz, J. (1997). Aspectos éticos y deontológicos de la evaluación psicológica. In A. Cordero (Ed.), Evaluación psicológica en el año 2000 (pp. 307-345). Madrid: TEA EdicionesMuñiz, J. (1998). La medición de lo psicológico. Psicothema, 10, 1– 21Muñiz, J. Hambleton, R.K. (1996). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests. Papeles del Psicólogo, 66, 63– 70Simner, M.L. (1996). Recommendations by the Canadian Psychological Association for improving the North American safeguards that help protect the public against test misuse. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 72– 82Tyler, B. (1986). Responsibility in practice: some implications of the BPS survey on test use. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 39, 410– 413
