Relation of Statistically Significant, Abnormal, and Typical WAIS-R VIQ-PIQ Discrepancies to Full Scale IQs
Abstract
Summary: In the United States' normative population for the WAIS-R, differences (Ds) between persons' verbal and performance IQs (VIQs and PIQs) tend to increase with an increase in full scale IQs (FSIQs). This suggests that norm-referenced interpretations of Ds should take FSIQs into account. Two new graphs are presented to facilitate this type of interpretation. One of these graphs estimates the mean of absolute values of D (called typical D) at each FSIQ level of the US normative population. The other graph estimates the absolute value of D that is exceeded only 5% of the time (called abnormal D) at each FSIQ level of this population. A graph for the identification of conventional “statistically significant Ds” (also called “reliable Ds”) is also presented. A reliable D is defined in the context of classical true score theory as an absolute D that is unlikely (p < .05) to be exceeded by a person whose true VIQ and PIQ are equal. As conventionally defined reliable Ds do not depend on the FSIQ. The graphs of typical and abnormal Ds are based on quadratic models of the relation of sizes of Ds to FSIQs. These models are generalizations of models described in Hsu (1996). The new graphical method of identifying Abnormal Ds is compared to the conventional Payne-Jones method of identifying these Ds. Implications of the three juxtaposed graphs for the interpretation of VIQ-PIQ differences are discussed.
References
References
Aiken, L.R. (1987). Assessment of intellectual functioning . Boston, MA: Allyn & BaconButcher, J. (1982). Cross-cultural research methods in clinical psychology. In P.C. Kendall & J.N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 273-308). New York: WileyDemsky, Y.I. Gass, C.S. Golden, C.J. (1998). Interpretation of VIQ-PIQ and intersubtest differences on the Spanish version of the WAIS (EIWA). Assessment, 5, 25– 29Golden, C.J. (1991). Clinical interpretation of objective psychological tests (2nd ed.). Boston: Taylor & FrancisGregory, R.J. (1996). Psychological testing (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & BaconGrossman, F.M. Herman, D.O. Matarazzo, J.D. (1985). statistically inferred versus empirically observed VIQ-PIQ differences in the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 268– 272Hsu, L.M. (1996). A modification of the Payne-Jones method of identifying abnormal differences in WISC-R Performance and Verbal IQs. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 27– 32Kaufman, A.L. (1990). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence . Boston, MA: Allyn & BaconKnight, R.G. (1983). On interpreting the several standard errors of the WAIS-R: Some further tables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 671– 673Matarazzo, J.D. Herman, D.O. (1985). Clinical uses of the WAIS-R: Base rates of differences between VIQ and PIQ in the WAIS-R standardization sample. In B.B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 899-932). New York: WileyMcGraw, K.O. Wong, S.P. (1994). The descriptive use of absolute differences between pairs of scores with a common mean and variance. Journal of Educational Statistics, 19, 103– 110Mood, A.M. Graybill, F.A. (1963). Introduction to the theory of statistics (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-HillRyan, J.J. Paolo, A.M. (1992). Verbal-performance IQ discrepancies on the WAIS-R: An examination of the old age standardization sample. Neuropsychology, 6, 293– 298Silverstein, A.B. (1985). Verbal-Performance IQ discrepancies on the WAIS-R: Estimated vs. empirical values. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 694– 697Turkheimer, E. Farace, E. (1992). A reanalysis of gender differences in IQ scores following unilateral brain lesions. Psychological Assessment, 4, 498– 501
