Orienting and Focusing in Voluntary and Involuntary Visuospatial Attention Conditions
An Event-Related Potential Study
Abstract
In the present study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral measurements in a peripherally cued line-orientation discrimination task to investigate the underlying mechanisms of orienting and focusing in voluntary and involuntary attention conditions. Informative peripheral cue (75% valid) with long stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was used in the voluntary attention condition; uninformative peripheral cue (50% valid) with short SOA was used in the involuntary attention condition. Both orienting and focusing were affected by attention type. Results for attention orienting in the voluntary attention condition confirmed the “sensory gain control theory,” as attention enhanced the amplitude of the early ERP components, P1 and N1, without latency changes. In the involuntary attention condition, compared with invalid trials, targets in the valid trials elicited larger and later contralateral P1 components, and smaller and later contralateral N1 components. Furthermore, but only in the voluntary attention condition, targets in the valid trials elicited larger N2 and P3 components than in the invalid trials. Attention focusing in the involuntary attention condition resulted in larger P1 components elicited by targets in small-cue trials compared to large-cue trials, whereas in the voluntary attention condition, larger P1 components were elicited by targets in large-cue trials than in small-cue trials. There was no interaction between orienting and focusing. These results suggest that orienting and focusing of visual-spatial attention are deployed independently regardless of attention type. In addition, the present results provide evidence of dissociation between voluntary and involuntary attention during the same task.
References
(1995). Shifting attention in visual space: The effects of peripheral cueing on brain cortical potentials. International Journal of Neuroscience, 80, 353–370.
(2005). Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 134, 207–221.
(1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of procession. Acta Psychologica, 73, 195–209.
(1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A 43, 859–880.
(1995). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170–187.
(1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 387–402.
(2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual procession: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1076, 116–128.
(2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 328–334.
(2004). The time course of the effects of central and peripheral cues on visual processing: An event-related potentials study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 199–210.
(1993). Spatial cueing, sensory gating, and selective response preparation: An ERP study on visuospatial orienting. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 408–420.
(1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
(1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583–597.
(2005). Event-related potentials reveal dissociable mechanisms for orienting and focusing visuospatial attention. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 341–353.
(2001). The attentional effects of peripheral cueing as revealed by two event-related potential studies. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 172–185.
(2008). When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: An event-related potential and dipole modeling study. NeuroImage, 39, 1345–1355.
(2007). Modulation of saccadic intrusions by exogenous and endogenous attention. Brain Research, 1141, 154–167.
(1999). Scale of attentional focus in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 837–859.
(2004). The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 3–22.
(2002). Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: Differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2325–2340.
(1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 802–811.
(1994). The cuing of attention to visual field locations: Analysis with ERP recordings. In , Cognitive electrophysiology: Event-related brain potentials in basic and clinical research (pp. 1–25). Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
(1998). Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex. Psychological Science, 9, 441–447.
(2006). Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing. NeuroImage, 31, 774–789.
(1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In , Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291–308.
(2001). Dynamics of the spatial scale of visual attention revealed by brain event-related potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 371–381.
(1995). Neural mechanism of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32, 4–18.
(1990). Electrophysiological studies of visual selective attention in humans. In , Neurobiology of higher cognitive function (pp. 271–295). New York: Guilford.
(1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1057–1074.
(1993). Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. In , Attention and performance XIV (pp. 219–243). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
(1999). Orienting attention in time: Modulation of brain potentials. Brain, 122, 1507–1518.
(1994). Qualitative differences in response bias from spatial cueing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 218–241.
(1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330.
(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
(1984). Components of visual orienting. In , Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1997). The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 885–899.
(1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695–703.
(2000). Automatic and voluntary focusing of attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 935–952.
(2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37, 190–203.
(1993). Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: Analysis and correction. Psychophysiology, 30, 98–119.
(1994). Electroencephalographic activity associated with shifts of visuospatial attention. Brain, 117, 553–562.
