Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000259

Abstract. The aim of this study was to determine if contingency awareness between the conditioned (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) is necessary for concurrent electrodermal and eyeblink conditioning to masked stimuli. An angry woman’s face (CS+) and a fearful face (CS−) were presented for 23 milliseconds (ms) and followed by a neutral face as a mask. A 98 dB noise burst (US) was administered 477 ms after CS+ offset to elicit both electrodermal and eyeblink responses. For the unmasking conditioning a 176 ms blank screen was inserted between the CS and the mask. Contingency awareness was assessed using trial-by-trial ratings of US-expectancy in a post-conditioning phase. The results showed acquisition of differential electrodermal and eyeblink conditioning in aware, but not in unaware participants. Acquisition of differential eyeblink conditioning required more trials than electrodermal conditioning. These results provided strong evidence of the causal role of contingency awareness on differential eyeblink and electrodermal conditioning.

References

  • Asli, O., Kulvedrosten, S., Solbakken, L. E., & Flaten, M. A. (2009). Fear potentiated startle at short intervals following conditioned stimulus onset during delay but not trace conditioning. Psychophysiology, 46, 880–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00809.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blumenthal, T. D., Elden, A., & Flaten, M. A. (2004). A comparison of several methods used to quantify prepulse inhibition of eyeblink responding. Psychophysiology, 41, 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00144.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, R. E., & Squire, L. R. (1998). Classical conditioning and brain systems: The role of awareness. Science, 280, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5360.77 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dawson, M. E., & Biferno, M. A. (1973). Concurrent measurement of awareness and electrodermal classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035524 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dawson, M. E., & Furedy, J. J. (1976). The role of awareness in human differential autonomic classical conditioning: The necessary-gate hypothesis. Psychophysiology, 13, 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb03336.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dawson, M. E., Rissling, A. J., Schell, A. M., & Wilcox, R. (2007). Under what conditions can human affective conditioning occur without contingency awareness? Test of the evaluative conditioning paradigm. Emotion, 7, 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.755 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face. A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Esteves, F., Parra, C., Dimberg, U., & Öhman, A. (1994). Nonconscious associative learning: Pavlovian conditioning of the skin conductance responses to masked fear-relevant facial stimuli. Psychophysiology, 31, 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02446.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jennings, J. R. (1987). Editorial policy on analysis of variance with repeated measures. Psychophysiology, 24, 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00320.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katkin, E. S., Wiens, S., & Öhman, A. (2001). Nonconscious fear conditioning, visceral perception, and the development of gut feeling. Psychological Science, 12, 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00368 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Knight, D. C., Nguyen, H. T., & Bandettini, P. A. (2006). The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 157–162. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.6.2.157 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lovibond, P. F., Liu, J. C. J., Weidemann, G., & Mitchell, C. J. (2011). Awareness is necessary for differential trace and delay eyeblink conditioning in humans. Biological Psychology, 87, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.05.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lovibond, P. F., & Shanks, D. R. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.28.1.3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manns, J. R., Clark, R. E., & Squire, L. R. (2000). Parallel acquisition of awareness and trace eyeblink classical conditioning. Learning and Memory, 7, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.33400 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manns, J. R., Clark, R. E., & Squire, L. R. (2001). Single-cue delay eyeblink conditioning is unrelated to awareness. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.1.2.192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manns, J. R., Clark, R. E., & Squire, L. R. (2002). Standard delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.28.1.32 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marcos, J. L., & Marcos, M. A. (2017). Eyeblink conditioning with a noise burst as unconditioned stimulus. Psicothema, 29, 78–82. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.146 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Science, 32, 193–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000855 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Öhman, A., & Soares, J. J. F. (1998). Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli: expectancies for aversive outcomes following nonrecognized fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.127.1.69 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schultz, D. H., & Helmstetter, F. J. (2010). Classical conditioning of autonomic fear responses is independent of contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020263 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sevenster, D., Beckers, T., & Kindt, M. (2014). Fear conditioning of SCR but not the startle reflex requires conscious discrimination of threat and safety. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00032 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shanks, D. R. (2010). Learning: from association to cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 273–301. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100519 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Singh, K., Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., Courtney, C. G., & Payne, A. F. H. (2013). Can autonomic classical conditioning occur without contingency awareness? The critical importance of the trial sequence. Biological Psychology, 93, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.02.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, C., Clark, R. E., Manns, J. R., & Squire, L. R. (2005). Acquisition of differential delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.78 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, R. F. (2005). In search of memory traces. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070239 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Venables, P. H., & Christie, M. J. (1980). Electrodermal activity. In I. MartinP. H. VenablesEds., Techniques in psychophysiology, New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wiens, S., Katkin, E. S., & Öhman, A. (2003). Effects of trial order and differential conditioning on acquisition of differential shock expectancy and skin conductance conditioning to masked stimuli. Psychophysiology, 40, 989–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00117 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woodruff-Pak, D. S., & Disterhoft, J. F. (2008). Where is the trace in trace conditioning? Trends in Neuroscience, 31, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.11.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar