Abstract
Abstract. The aim of this study was to determine if contingency awareness between the conditioned (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) is necessary for concurrent electrodermal and eyeblink conditioning to masked stimuli. An angry woman’s face (CS+) and a fearful face (CS−) were presented for 23 milliseconds (ms) and followed by a neutral face as a mask. A 98 dB noise burst (US) was administered 477 ms after CS+ offset to elicit both electrodermal and eyeblink responses. For the unmasking conditioning a 176 ms blank screen was inserted between the CS and the mask. Contingency awareness was assessed using trial-by-trial ratings of US-expectancy in a post-conditioning phase. The results showed acquisition of differential electrodermal and eyeblink conditioning in aware, but not in unaware participants. Acquisition of differential eyeblink conditioning required more trials than electrodermal conditioning. These results provided strong evidence of the causal role of contingency awareness on differential eyeblink and electrodermal conditioning.
References
2009). Fear potentiated startle at short intervals following conditioned stimulus onset during delay but not trace conditioning. Psychophysiology, 46, 880–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00809.x
(2004). A comparison of several methods used to quantify prepulse inhibition of eyeblink responding. Psychophysiology, 41, 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00144.x
(1998). Classical conditioning and brain systems: The role of awareness. Science, 280, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5360.77
(1973). Concurrent measurement of awareness and electrodermal classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035524
(1976). The role of awareness in human differential autonomic classical conditioning: The necessary-gate hypothesis. Psychophysiology, 13, 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb03336.x
(2007). Under what conditions can human affective conditioning occur without contingency awareness? Test of the evaluative conditioning paradigm. Emotion, 7, 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.755
(1975). Unmasking the face. A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(1994). Nonconscious associative learning: Pavlovian conditioning of the skin conductance responses to masked fear-relevant facial stimuli. Psychophysiology, 31, 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02446.x
(1987). Editorial policy on analysis of variance with repeated measures. Psychophysiology, 24, 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00320.x
(2001). Nonconscious fear conditioning, visceral perception, and the development of gut feeling. Psychological Science, 12, 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00368
(2006). The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 157–162. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.6.2.157
(2011). Awareness is necessary for differential trace and delay eyeblink conditioning in humans. Biological Psychology, 87, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.05.002
(2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.28.1.3
(2000). Parallel acquisition of awareness and trace eyeblink classical conditioning. Learning and Memory, 7, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.33400
(2001). Single-cue delay eyeblink conditioning is unrelated to awareness. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.1.2.192
(2002). Standard delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.28.1.32
(2017). Eyeblink conditioning with a noise burst as unconditioned stimulus. Psicothema, 29, 78–82. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.146
(2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Science, 32, 193–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000855
(1998). Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli: expectancies for aversive outcomes following nonrecognized fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.127.1.69
(2010). Classical conditioning of autonomic fear responses is independent of contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020263
(2014). Fear conditioning of SCR but not the startle reflex requires conscious discrimination of threat and safety. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00032
(2010). Learning: from association to cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 273–301. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100519
(2013). Can autonomic classical conditioning occur without contingency awareness? The critical importance of the trial sequence. Biological Psychology, 93, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.02.007
(2005). Acquisition of differential delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.78
(2005). In search of memory traces. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070239
(1980).
(Electrodermal activity . In I. MartinP. H. VenablesEds., Techniques in psychophysiology, New York, NY: Wiley.2003). Effects of trial order and differential conditioning on acquisition of differential shock expectancy and skin conductance conditioning to masked stimuli. Psychophysiology, 40, 989–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00117
(2008). Where is the trace in trace conditioning? Trends in Neuroscience, 31, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.11.006
(