The Nomological Network of Emotion Recognition Ability
Evidence from the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test
Abstract
Abstract. The ability to recognize other people’s emotions from their face, voice, and body (emotion recognition ability, ERA) is crucial to successful functioning in private and professional life. The Geneva Emotion Recognition Test (GERT; Schlegel, Grandjean, & Scherer, 2014) is a new instrument to measure ERA in a more ecologically valid way than previous tests. In this article, we report the results of five studies examining the test’s construct validity with a total N of 1,284. We found that the GERT was highly positively correlated with other performance-based tests measuring ERA and emotional intelligence (EI), as well as with cognitive intelligence. GERT scores were also related to higher self-reported empathy, openness, and neuroticism, and to better social adjustment. Furthermore, higher GERT scores were related to lower anxiety, anger expressivity, and alexithymia. In line with previous findings, women scored higher than men and GERT performance declined with increasing age. Taken together, these results provide considerable evidence for the construct validity of the GERT and for ERA as an adaptive skill that likely facilitates better life outcomes.
References
2003). Manual for the ASEBA Adult Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, Families.
(1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale – I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 23–32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1
(2009). Emotion recognition from expressions in face, voice, and body: The Multimodal Emotion Recognition Test (MERT). Emotion, 9, 691–704. doi: 10.1037/a0017088
(2012). Introducing the Geneva Multimodal expression corpus for experimental research on emotion perception. Emotion, 12, 1161–1179. doi: 10.1037/a0025827
(2011). Introducing the MiniPONS: A Short Multichannel Version of the Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS). Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35, 189–204. doi: 10.1007/s10919-011-0108-3
(2015). The cue is the key: The relevance of cues and contextual information in the social understanding tasks of the Magdeburg Test of Social Intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 38–44. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000204
(2016).
(Is there a general skill in perceiving others accurately? In J. A. HallM. Schmid MastT. V. WestEds., The social psychology of perceiving others accurately (pp. 379–403). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.2008). Une adaptation française du STAXI-2, inventaire de colère-trait et de colère-état de C.D. Spielberger
([A French adaptation of the STAXI-2, State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory by C.D. Spielberger] . L’Encéphale, 34, 249–255. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.06.0011999). Nonverbal decoding skills and relationship well-being in adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 91–100. doi: 10.1023/A:1021339410262
(1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
(1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
(2004). Temporal stability and differential relationships with neuroticism and extraversion of the three subscales of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in clinical and nonclinical samples. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 25–33. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00577-4
(2010). Impaired Attribution of Emotion to Facial Expressions in Anxiety and Major Depression. PLoS One, 5(12), e15058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015058
(2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203–235. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.203
(2007). Reading your counterpart: The benefit of emotion recognition accuracy for effectiveness in negotiation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 31, 205–223. doi: 10.1007/s10919-007-0033-7
(2008). Psychometric properties of the Dutch Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 25–35. doi: 10.5334/pb-48-1-25
(2001). The forced-choice paradigm and the perception of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 75–85. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.75
(1993). Adaptation canadienne-française de la forme revisée du State-Trait Anxiety Inventory de Spielberger
([French-Canadian adaptation of the revised State-trait anxiety inventory by Spielberger] . Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 25, 559–578. doi: 10.1037/h00788812007). Reconstructing N: A new approach to measuring emotional sensitivity. Current Psychology, 26, 37–45. doi: 10.1007/s12144-007-9004-8
(2002). Alexithymia, empathy, and psychological symptoms in a family context. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 43, 448–455. doi: 10.1053/comp.2002.35905
(1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909/78/8504-0845
(2001).
(The PONS Test and the psychometric approach to measuring interpersonal sensitivity . In J. A. HallF. J. BernieriEds., Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and Measurement (pp. 145–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2009). Psychosocial correlates of interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 149–180. doi: 10.1007/s10919-009-0070-5
(2004). Gender differences in judgments of multiple emotions from facial expressions. Emotion, 4, 201–206. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.201
(1991). The Big Five Inventory-versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
(2013).
(Issues in the measurement of judgmental accuracy . In S. Baron-CohenH. Tager-FlusbergM. V. LombardoEds., Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience (pp. 104–116). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.2010). Facial emotion perception in schizophrenia: A meta-analytic review. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 1009–1019. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn192
(2012). Age-related decrease in recognition of emotional facial and prosodic expressions. Emotion, 12, 529–539. doi: 10.1037/a0026827
(2000). Pervasive emotion recognition deficit common to alexithymia and the repressive coping style. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 492–501. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200007000-00007
(2011). Incremental validity and indirect effect of ethical development on work performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1110–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.036
(2012). Validity evidence for the situational judgment test paradigm in emotional intelligence measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 438–447. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.682063
(2011). Emotional intelligence as assessed by situational judgment and emotion recognition tests: Building the nomological net. Psihologijske teme, 20, 393–412.
(2008). New paradigms for assessing emotional intelligence: Theory and data. Emotion, 8, 540–551. doi: 10.1037/a0012746
(2008). Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 454–465. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.08.003
(2000). A new test to measure emotion recognition ability: Matsumoto and Ekman’s Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBART). Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 179–209. doi: 10.1023/A:1006668120583
(2007). Trait emotional intelligence, psychological well-being, and peer-rated social competence in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 263–275. doi: 10.1348/026151006X118577
(1997).
(What is emotional intelligence? In P. SaloveyD. SluyterEds., Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Basic Books.2003). Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. Emotion, 3, 97–105. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.97
(1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215–238. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.215
(2007). Psychometric properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, construct, and incremental validity in a French-speaking population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 338–353. doi: 10.1080/00223890701333431
(2011). Intelligence and interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 39, 54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2010.10.001
(2009).
(Psychometric properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire . In C. StoughD. H. SaklofskeJ. D. ParkerEds., Advances in the assessment of emotional intelligence (pp. 85–101). New York, NY: Springer.2007). The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 273–289. doi: 10.1348/000712606X120618
(2010). Validation par analyse factorielle du Big Five Inventory français (BFI-Fr). Analyse convergente avec le NEO-PI-R
([Validation of the BFI-Fr through factor analysis. Convergent analysis with the NEO-PI-R] . Annales Médico-Psychologiques Revue Psychiatrique, 168, 97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.amp.2009.09.0032003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
(1993). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
(2001).
(Self-report measurement of interpersonal sensitivity . In J. A. HallF. J. BernieriEds., Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 127–142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2010). Emotional intelligence: Toward a consensus of models and measures. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 821–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00277.x
(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS Test. Baltimore, ML: Johns Hopkins University Press.
(2011). Ecological validity and age-related change in emotion recognition. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35, 297–304. doi: 10.1007/s10919-011-0116-3
(2008). A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 863–881. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.001
(2010). Controlling for response biases clarifies sex and age differences in facial affect recognition. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 207–221. doi: 10.1007/s10919-010-0092-z
(2011). Assessing the ability to recognize facial and vocal expressions of emotion: Construction and validation of the Emotion Recognition Index. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35, 305–326. doi: 10.1007/s10919-011-0115-4
(2012). Emotion recognition: Unidimensional ability or a set of modality- and emotion-specific skills? Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.026
(2014). Introducing the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test: An example of Rasch-based test development. Psychological Assessment, 26, 666–672. doi: 10.1037/a0035246
(2015). Introducing a short version of the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test (GERT-S): Psychometric properties and construct validation. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1383–1392. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0646-4
(2014).
(Meta-analysis of correlations corrected individually for artifacts . In F. L. SchmidtJ. E. HunterEds., Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed., pp. 75–135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1988). State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. Wiley Online Library.
(1983). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
(2003). Batterie de tests d’aptitudes cognitives NV5-R–Manuel
([Battery of aptitude tests NV5-R] . Paris, France: Pearson.2012). Distinct emotional abilities converge: Evidence from emotional understanding and emotion recognition through the voice. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 350–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.02.005
(2014). Sex differences in the ability to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 1164–1195. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.875889
(2011). Neural basis of emotion recognition deficits in first-episode major depression. Psychological Medicine, 41, 1397–1405. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710002084
(2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 477–514. doi: 10.1177/1094428110366036
(