Measuring Anxiety-Related Avoidance With the Driving and Riding Avoidance Scale (DRAS)
Abstract
Abstract. Driving anxiety is a common experience that, for those with high levels of driving anxiety, can markedly interfere with functioning, particularly because of avoidance behavior. The Driving and Riding Avoidance Scale (DRAS; Stewart & St. Peter, 2004) is a promising measure of self-reported avoidance, but its psychometric properties have been questioned as the instructions do not specifically ask respondents to report avoidance that is due to driving anxiety. The present study investigated the psychometric properties of the DRAS using revised instructions in 437 participants from the general population of New Zealand. Internal consistency for the DRAS was 0.94 and ranged from 0.79 to 0.90 for the four subscales. A two-factor solution was supported, in line with previous research using the revised instructions, supporting the distinction between general and traffic avoidance compared with weather and riding avoidance. Further work on the psychometric properties of this measure with clinical samples is needed to clarify the subscale structure.
References
1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296–298.
(2013). Polish adaptation of the Driving and Riding Avoidance Scale. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2013-0021
(2004). After the crash: Psychological assessment and treatment of survivors of motor vehicle accidents (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2011). The Driving Behavior Survey: Scale construction and validation. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.08.008
(2011). Factors contributing to anxious driving behaviour: The role of stress history and accident severity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.01.008
(2014). Properties of the Driving Behavior Survey among individuals with motor vehicle accident-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.10.008
(2007). An application of the driver behaviour questionnaire in an Australian organisational fleet setting. Transportation Research Part F, 10, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.03.001
(2011). Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys. Quality & Quantity, 45, 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715210363534
(2009). Measurement equivalence of paper-and-pencil and internet organisational surveys: A large scale examination in 16 countries. Applied Psychology, 58, 336–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00350.x
(1994). Clinical characteristics of driving phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 8, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6185(94)00021-2
(2007). The Driving Cognitions Questionnaire: Development and preliminary psychometric properties. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21(4), 493–509.
(2006). Contribution of cognitive factors to the prediction of posttraumatic stress disorder, phobia and depression after motor vehicle accidents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1699–1716. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.11.013
(1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(1995).
(Evaluating model fit . In R. H. HoyleEd., Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.2015). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.
(1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
(1995). Assessment and treatment of motor vehicle accident victims. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 2, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1077-7229(95)80016-6
(1995). A brief self-rating scale for PTSD after road vehicle accident. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 9, 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6185(95)00029-N
(1997). Impression management and self-deception in traffic behaviour inventories. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00221-8
(2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research: Methods Instruments, and Computers, 32, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807
(2006). Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: A comparison of six countries. Transportation Research Part F, 9, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.002
(1995). Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics, 38, 1036–1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925170
(1990). Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction? Ergonomics, 33, 1315–1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008925335
(2014). Measurement equivalence and latent mean differences of personality scores across different media and proctoring administration conditions. Computer in Human Behavior, 36, 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.010
(2005). Making sense of multivariate data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
(2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2004). Driving and riding avoidance following motor vehicle crashes in a non-clinical sample: Psychometric properties of a new measure. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 859–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00203-1
(2002). Aberrant driving behaviours amongst New Zealand truck drivers. Transportation Research Part F, 5, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00019-0
(2010). Social desirability and self-reported driving avoidance: Should we be worried? Transportation Research Part F, 13, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2010.04.004
(2018). The extent and characteristics of driving anxiety. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.031
(1999). Acquisition and severity of driving-related fears. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00065-5
(2000). Comparison and characteristics of motor vehicle accident (MVA) and non-MVA driving fears. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 14, 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6185(99)00040-7
(2002). Driving-related fear: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00114-3
(2007). Diagnostic features, symptom severity, and help-seeking in a media-recruited sample of women with driving fear. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment, 29, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9032-y
(2008). The relationship between driving anxiety and driving skill: A review of human factors and anxiety-performance theories to clarify future research needs. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 37, 28–37.
(1995). Anxiety disorders due to motor vehicle accidents: Nature and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(95)00043-7
(2009). What does the Driving and Riding Avoidance Scale (DRAS) measure? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 504–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.10.006
(2003). Exploring the use of computer games and virtual reality in exposure therapy for fear of driving following a motor vehicle accident. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6, 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103322011641
(2011). A cross-national investigation of the measurement equivalence of computerized organizational attitude surveys: A two-study design in multiple nations. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 21, 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2011.590112.
(