Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Pregnancy Anxiety Questionnaire Revised-2

A Contribution to Its Validation

Published Online:November 25, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000559

Abstract

Abstract. Pregnancy-related anxiety is an important risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes and postnatal parental well-being, to a greater extent than general anxiety, calling for a reliable and validated measure for its assessment. The current paper aimed to validate the Pregnancy Anxiety Questionnaire – Revised-2 (PRAQ-R2; Huizink et al., 2016) in a sample of Italian women, by testing its psychometric properties, and checking for Italian–Finnish measurement invariance. Additionally, the association with general anxiety and depression was examined. Participants included 348 Italian pregnant women and 348 Finnish pregnant women. Results showed that the Italian version of PRAQ-R2 presents satisfying psychometric proprieties. Data supported a three-factor solution including fear of giving birth, worries about bearing a handicapped child, and concern about own appearance. Invariance across countries was confirmed. The primiparous condition was associated with a higher level of pregnancy anxiety only for fear of giving birth. A moderate correlation was found between pregnancy anxiety and general anxiety and depression, providing evidence for concurrent validity, as well as for the existence of a specific pregnancy anxiety dimension.

References

  • Barone, L., Lionetti, F., & Dellagiulia, A. (2014). Maternal-fetal attachment and its correlates in a sample of Italian women: A study using the Prenatal Attachment Inventory. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 32, 230–239. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bayrampour, H., Ali, E., McNeil, D. A., Benzies, K., MacQueen, G., & Tough, S. (2016). Pregnancy-related anxiety: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 55, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beaujean, A. A., Freeman, M. J., Youngstrom, E., & Carlson, G. (2012). The structure of cognitive abilities in youths with manic symptoms: A factorial invariance study. Assessment, 19, 462–471. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistic Software. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Benvenuti, P. (1999). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Validation for an Italian sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 53, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00102-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Biaggi, A., Conroy, S., Pawlby, S., & Pariante, C. M. (2016). Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 191, 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blackmore, E. R., Gustafsson, H., Gilchrist, M., Wyman, C., & O’Connor, T. G. (2016). Pregnancy-related anxiety: Evidence of distinct clinical significance from a prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 197, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brunton, R. J., Dryer, R., Saliba, A., & Kohlhoff, J. (2015). Pregnancy anxiety: A systematic review of current scales. Journal of Affective Disorders, 176, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.039 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P. J. (2011). Anxiety: Splitting the phenomenological atom. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147–167. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dennis, C.-L., Falah-Hassani, K., & Shiri, R. (2017). Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 210, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dunkel Schetter, C., & Tanner, L. (2012). Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 25, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503680 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Epskamp, S. & with contributions from Simon Stuber. (2017). semplot: Path diagrams and visual analysis of various sem packages’ output (R package version 1.1) [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semPlot First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, K., Spiby, H., & Morrell, C. J. (2015). A psychometric systematic review of self-report instruments to identify anxiety in pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71, 1986–2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12649 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fox, J. (2016). polycor: Polychoric and polyserial correlations (R package version 0.7-9) [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=polycor First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibson, J., McKenzie-Mcharg, K., Shakespeare, J., Price, J., & Gray, R. (2009). A systematic review of studies validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in antepartum and postpartum women. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 119, 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01363.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Glynn, L. M., Howland, M. A., Sandman, C. A., Davis, E. P., Phelan, M., Baram, T. Z., & Stern, H. S. (2017). Prenatal maternal mood patterns predict child temperament and adolescent mental health. Journal of Affective Disorders, 228, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.065 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guardino, C. M., & Schetter, C. D. (2014). Understanding pregnancy anxiety: Concepts, correlates and consequences. Zero to Three, 3, 12–21. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huizink, A. C., Delforterie, M. J., Scheinin, N. M., Tolvanen, M., Karlsson, L., & Karlsson, H. (2016). Adaption of Pregnancy Anxiety Questionnaire – Revised for all pregnant women regardless of parity: PRAQ-R2. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 19, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-015-0531-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huizink, A. C., Menting, B., de Moor, M. H. M., Verhage, M. L., Kunseler, F. C., Schuengel, C., & Oosterman, M. (2017). From prenatal anxiety to parenting stress: A longitudinal study. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 20, 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-017-0746-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huizink, A. C., Menting, B., Oosterman, M., Verhage, M. L., Kunseler, F. C., & Schuengel, C. (2014). The interrelationship between pregnancy-specific anxiety and general anxiety across pregnancy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics Gynaecology, 35, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2014.944498 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huizink, A. C., Mulder, E. J. H., Robles de Medina, P. G., Visser, G. H. A., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2004). Is pregnancy anxiety a distinctive syndrome? Early Human Development, 79, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.04.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jӧreskog, K. G., & Sӧrbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karlsson, L., Tolvanen, M., Scheinin, N. M., Uusitupa, H. M., Korja, R., Ekholm, E., … Karlsson, H. (2018). Cohort profile: The FinnBrain birth cohort study (FinnBrain). International Journal of Epidemiology, 47, 15–16j. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx173 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koelewijn, J. M., Sluijs, A. M., & Vrijkotte, T. G. M. (2017). Possible relationship between general and pregnancy-related anxiety during the first half of pregnancy and the birth process: A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 7, e013413. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013413 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lionetti, F., Keijsers, L., Dellagiulia, A., & Pastore, M. (2016). Evidence of factorial validity of parental knowledge, control and solicitation, and adolescent disclosure scales: When the ordered nature of Likert scales matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 941. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • O’Donnell, K. J., Glover, V., Barker, E. D., & O’Connor, T. G. (2014). The persisting effect of maternal mood in pregnancy on childhood psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000029 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pedrabissi, L., & Santaniello, M. (1996). STAI: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory – Forma Y [State Trait Anxiety Inventory - Form Y]. Firenze, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reck, C., Zimmer, K., Dubber, S., Zipser, B., Schlehe, B., & Gawlik, S. (2013). The influence of general anxiety and childbirth-specific anxiety on birth outcome. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 16, 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-013-0344-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/ First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shahhosseini, Z., Pourasghar, M., Khalilian, A., & Salehi, F. (2015). A review of the effects of anxiety during pregnancy on children’s health. Materia Socio-Medica, 27, 200–202. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2015.27.200-202 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1989). EzPATH: Causal Modeling: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van den Bergh, B. (1990). The influence of maternal emotion during pregnancy on fetal and neonatal behavior. Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health, 5, 119–130. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Westerneng, M., Witteveen, A. B., Warmelink, J. C., Spelten, E., Honig, A., & de Cock, P. (2017). Pregnancy-specific anxiety and its association with background characteristics and health-related behaviors in a low-risk population. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 75, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.02.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2 [Computer software manual]. New York, NY: Springer. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/ggplot2.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. BryantM. WindleS. G. WestEds., The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yang-Wallentin, F., Jöreskog, K. G., & Luo, H. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with misspecified models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2010.489003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar