Development of Short and Ultra-Short Forms of the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale
Relations to the Big Five, Narcissism, and Academic Achievement in Adults and Adolescents
Abstract
Abstract. The multidimensional assessment of self-esteem plays an important role in self-esteem research. In this article, we present the development of a short form and an ultra-short form of the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale (MSES; Schütz et al., 2016). Items were selected by eliminating redundant items and by using a deterministic search algorithm in a sample of 644 adults (Mage = 47.0). Construct validity was established by investigating the relations between each MSES short form and other constructs and cross-validating the factor structure of both short forms of the MSES in 674 adolescents (Mage = 14.2) and in 425 adults from a preregistered study (Mage = 49.1). Both short scales demonstrated satisfactory reliability and factorial validity in all samples. Analyses examining relations with the Big Five personality traits, narcissism, and academic achievement supported construct validity in all age groups. The present research indicates that the short versions of the MSES are economic and valid instruments for measuring multidimensional self-esteem in adolescents and adults. The short form (MSES-24) should be particularly useful in applied research settings with a need to reduce participants’ burden, whereas the ultra-short form (MSES-12) may prove convenient for panel studies and large-scale research with limited time capacities.
References
2012). On the validity of idiographic and generic self-concept implicit association tests: A core-concept model. European Journal of Personality, 26, 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.850
(1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.
(2006).
(The three faces of self-esteem . In M. H. KernisEd., Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 4–9). Psychology Press.1993).
(Alternative ways of assessing model fit . In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.2007).
(The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies . In C. SedikidesS. J. SpencerEds., The self (pp. 115–138). Psychology Press.2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
(1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
(2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.002
(2020). Are the machines taking over? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(2), 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000597
(1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem: II. Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.404
(1980). The dimensionality of self-esteem: Some results for a college sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 921–929. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.921
(2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029629
(2012). A comparison of method effects in two confirmatory factor models for structurally different methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(3), 409–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687658
(2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
(2016). Narcissism and self-insight: A review and meta-analysis of narcissists’ self-enhancement tendencies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215611636
(2006).
(The development of self-esteem . In M. H. KernisEd., Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 144–150). Psychology Press.2010). Is implicit self-esteem linked to shape and weight concerns in restrained and unrestrained eaters? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.08.009
(1959).
(Sex differences and factors related to persuasibility . In C. I. HovlandI. L. JanisEds., Personality and persuasibility (pp. 55–68). Yale University Press.2017). Following the ants: Development of short scales for proactive personality and supervisor support by Ant Colony Optimization. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000299
(1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
(1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.17
(2012). A short form of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (Unpublished manuscript). TU Chemnitz.
(1979). Psychometrics and psychology. London Academic Press.
(2016). Predicting self-confident behaviour with implicit and explicit self-esteem measures. European Journal of Personality, 30, 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2076
(2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen
([Validity and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory in young, middle-aged and old adults] . Diagnostica, 47(3), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.47.3.1111987). The hierarchical structure of self-concept and the application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00259.x
(1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.417
(1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1
(2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
(2006). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74(2), 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00380.x
(1985). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relations with sex and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.5.581
(1998). Top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal models: The direction of causality in multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.509
(2006). Effort in phone survey response rates: The effects of vendor and client-controlled factors. Field Methods, 18(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282259
(1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
(2012). The self-perception profile for adults: Manual and questionnaires (Unpublished manuscript). University of Denver.
(2007). Construct validation of a short five-factor model instrument. A self-peer study on the German adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.166
(1998–2019). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
(2012). Life-span development of self-esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025558
(2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
(1988). A principal components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
(2020, December 8). Development of short and ultra-short forms of the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale. https://osf.io/39d67
(2021, March 23). Development of short and ultra-short forms of the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale: Relations to the Big Five, narcissism, and academic achievement in adults and adolescents. https://osf.io/gn42x
(2019). On the popularity of agentic and communal narcissists: The tit-for-tat hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(9), 1365–1377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218824359
(2015). Who turns green with envy? Conceptual and empirical perspectives on dispositional envy. European Journal of Personality, 29(5), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2012
(2018). Stability and change in domain-specific self-esteem and global self-esteem. European Journal of Personality, 32, 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2167
(2013). Being called a “Streber”: The roles of personality and competition in the labelling of academically oriented students. European Journal of Personality, 27, 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1884
(2016). The structure of multidimensional self-esteem across age and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.012
(2002). Global self-esteem across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 17, 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.423
(2011). Dialectic behavioral therapy has an impact on self-concept clarity and facets of self-esteem in women with borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.684
(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
(1976). Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
(2018). Stuart: Subtests using algorithmic rummaging techniques (R Package, Version 0.7.3). https://bitbucket.org/martscht/stuart
(2004). Die Messung von Narzissmus als Persönlichkeitskonstrukt. Psychometrische Eigenschaften einer Lang- und einer Kurzform des Deutschen NPI (Narcissistic Personality Inventory)
([Measuring narcissism as a personality construct: Psychometric properties of a long and a short version of the German Narcissistic Personality Inventory] . Diagnostica, 50(4), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.2022016). Multidimensionale Selbstwertskala (MSWS, 2. überarb. neunorm. Aufl.)
([Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale (MSES, 2nd ed.)] . Hogrefe.1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
(2012). Zur Validität des Vulnerabilitätsmodells der Glücksspielsucht
([Validity of the vulnerability model of pathological gambling] . Sucht, 58, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1024/0939-5911.a0001832016). The development of global and domain-specific self-esteem from age 13 to 31. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(4), 592–608. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000060
(2016). Personality-situation transactions from adolescence to old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000054
(