Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Development of Short and Ultra-Short Forms of the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale

Relations to the Big Five, Narcissism, and Academic Achievement in Adults and Adolescents

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000660

Abstract. The multidimensional assessment of self-esteem plays an important role in self-esteem research. In this article, we present the development of a short form and an ultra-short form of the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale (MSES; Schütz et al., 2016). Items were selected by eliminating redundant items and by using a deterministic search algorithm in a sample of 644 adults (Mage = 47.0). Construct validity was established by investigating the relations between each MSES short form and other constructs and cross-validating the factor structure of both short forms of the MSES in 674 adolescents (Mage = 14.2) and in 425 adults from a preregistered study (Mage = 49.1). Both short scales demonstrated satisfactory reliability and factorial validity in all samples. Analyses examining relations with the Big Five personality traits, narcissism, and academic achievement supported construct validity in all age groups. The present research indicates that the short versions of the MSES are economic and valid instruments for measuring multidimensional self-esteem in adolescents and adults. The short form (MSES-24) should be particularly useful in applied research settings with a need to reduce participants’ burden, whereas the ultra-short form (MSES-12) may prove convenient for panel studies and large-scale research with limited time capacities.

References

  • Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2012). On the validity of idiographic and generic self-concept implicit association tests: A core-concept model. European Journal of Personality, 26, 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.850 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, D. J., & Marshall, M. A. (2006). The three faces of self-esteem. In M. H. KernisEd., Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 4–9). Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. SedikidesS. J. SpencerEds., The self (pp. 115–138). Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dörendahl, J., & Greiff, S. (2020). Are the machines taking over? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(2), 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000597 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fleming, J. S., & Courtney, B. E. (1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem: II. Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.404 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleming, J. S., & Watts, W. A. (1980). The dimensionality of self-esteem: Some results for a college sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 921–929. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.921 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029629 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geiser, C., Eid, M., West, S. G., Lischetzke, T., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2012). A comparison of method effects in two confirmatory factor models for structurally different methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(3), 409–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687658 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grijalva, E., & Zhang, L. (2016). Narcissism and self-insight: A review and meta-analysis of narcissists’ self-enhancement tendencies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215611636 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harter, S. (2006). The development of self-esteem. In M. H. KernisEd., Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 144–150). Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffmeister, K., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Blechert, J., Klauer, K. C., & Tuschen-Caffier, B. (2010). Is implicit self-esteem linked to shape and weight concerns in restrained and unrestrained eaters? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.08.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Janis, I. L., & Field, P. B. (1959). Sex differences and factors related to persuasibility. In C. I. HovlandI. L. JanisEds., Personality and persuasibility (pp. 55–68). Yale University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Janssen, A. B., Schultze, M., & Grötsch, A. (2017). Following the ants: Development of short scales for proactive personality and supervisor support by Ant Colony Optimization. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000299 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P., Donhaue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.17 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klavina, E., & Schröder-Abé, M. (2012). A short form of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (Unpublished manuscript). TU Chemnitz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, P. (1979). Psychometrics and psychology. London Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krause, S., Back, M. D., Egloff, B., & Schmuckle, S. C. (2016). Predicting self-confident behaviour with implicit and explicit self-esteem measures. European Journal of Personality, 30, 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2076 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, F. R., Lüdtke, O., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen [Validity and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory in young, middle-aged and old adults]. Diagnostica, 47(3), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.47.3.111 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). The hierarchical structure of self-concept and the application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00259.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.417 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74(2), 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00380.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D., & Barnes, J. (1985). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relations with sex and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.5.581 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal models: The direction of causality in multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.509 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCarty, C., House, M., Harman, J., & Richards, S. (2006). Effort in phone survey response rates: The effects of vendor and client-controlled factors. Field Methods, 18(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282259 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Messer, B., & Harter, S. (2012). The self-perception profile for adults: Manual and questionnaires (Unpublished manuscript). University of Denver. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muck, P. M., Hell, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2007). Construct validation of a short five-factor model instrument. A self-peer study on the German adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.166 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2019). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Orth, U., Robins, R. W., & Widaman, K. F. (2012). Life-span development of self-esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025558 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rentzsch, K., Erz, E., & Schütz, A. (2020, December 8). Development of short and ultra-short forms of the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale. https://osf.io/39d67 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rentzsch, K., Erz, E., & Schütz, A. (2021, March 23). Development of short and ultra-short forms of the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale: Relations to the Big Five, narcissism, and academic achievement in adults and adolescents. https://osf.io/gn42x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rentzsch, K., & Gebauer, J. (2019). On the popularity of agentic and communal narcissists: The tit-for-tat hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(9), 1365–1377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218824359 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rentzsch, K., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Who turns green with envy? Conceptual and empirical perspectives on dispositional envy. European Journal of Personality, 29(5), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rentzsch, K., & Schröder-Abé, M. (2018). Stability and change in domain-specific self-esteem and global self-esteem. European Journal of Personality, 32, 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2167 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rentzsch, K., Schröder-Abé, M., & Schütz, A. (2013). Being called a “Streber”: The roles of personality and competition in the labelling of academically oriented students. European Journal of Personality, 27, 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1884 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rentzsch, K., Wenzler, M. P., & Schütz, A. (2016). The structure of multidimensional self-esteem across age and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tracy, J. L., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2002). Global self-esteem across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 17, 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.423 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roepke, S., Schröder-Abé, M., Schütz, A., Jacob, G., Dams, A., Vater, A., Rüter, A., Merkl, A., Heuser, I., & Lammers, C.-H. (2011). Dialectic behavioral therapy has an impact on self-concept clarity and facets of self-esteem in women with borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.684 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schultze, M. (2018). Stuart: Subtests using algorithmic rummaging techniques (R Package, Version 0.7.3). https://bitbucket.org/martscht/stuart First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schütz, A., Marcus, B., & Sellin, I. (2004). Die Messung von Narzissmus als Persönlichkeitskonstrukt. Psychometrische Eigenschaften einer Lang- und einer Kurzform des Deutschen NPI (Narcissistic Personality Inventory) [Measuring narcissism as a personality construct: Psychometric properties of a long and a short version of the German Narcissistic Personality Inventory]. Diagnostica, 50(4), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.202 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schütz, A., Rentzsch, K., & Sellin, I. (2016). Multidimensionale Selbstwertskala (MSWS, 2. überarb. neunorm. Aufl.) [Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale (MSES, 2nd ed.)]. Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vierhaus, M., Ewering, J., Klein, F., Ködding, C., & Petry, J. (2012). Zur Validität des Vulnerabilitätsmodells der Glücksspielsucht [Validity of the vulnerability model of pathological gambling]. Sucht, 58, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1024/0939-5911.a000183 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Von Soest, T., Wichstrøm, L., & Kvalem, I. L. (2016). The development of global and domain-specific self-esteem from age 13 to 31. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(4), 592–608. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000060 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wrzus, C., Wagner, G. G., & Riediger, M. (2016). Personality-situation transactions from adolescence to old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000054 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar