Abstract
Abstract. The development of information and communication technologies has stimulated a variety of data and informational resources about human behavior. This is contributing toward collaborative efforts in the formalization and systematization of an overwhelming volume of scientific information. Several tools are helpful for this endeavor, among which the ontology is growing in popularity. Most of the available informational resources adopt the ontology to organize a shared conceptualization of a given body of knowledge. In the present study, we reviewed ontology resources (n = 17) that can be of interest to researchers and scholars involved in human behavior and psychological research. The selected ontologies were contrasted on the three main components of ontologies, classes, individuals, and properties, and on scheme and knowledge metrics. Moreover, we recorded the associations of the terms within a given ontology with terms of other ontologies (mappings), the number of projects using a particular ontology, and whether an ontology was available within the Bioportal, an extensive repository about biomedical ontologies. A few working examples were also provided to clarify how these resources might contribute to improve the analysis, understanding, and research cooperation about human behavior and psychological research.
References
2002). KMsim: A meta-modelling approach and environment for creating process-oriented knowledge management simulations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International Conference in Knowledge engineering and knowledge management. Ontologies and the semantic web EKAW, Sigüenza (Spain). doi: 10.1007/3-540-45810-7
(2000). Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics, 25, 25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556
(2015). A multilayer ontology of instruments for neurological, behavioral and cognitive assessments. Neuroinformatics, 13, 93–110. doi: 10.1007/s12021-014-9244-3
(2009). Cognitive ontologies for neuropsychiatric phenomics research. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 14, 419–450. doi: 10.1080/13546800902787180
(2016). Text mining a self-report back-translation. Psychological Assessment, 28, 750–764. doi: 10.1037/pas0000213
(2008). The NIFSTD and BIRNLex vocabularies: Building comprehensive ontologies for neuroscience. Neuroinformatics, 6, 175–194. doi: 10.1007/s12021-008-9032-z
(2003). Tools and approaches for the construction of knowledge models from the neuroscientific literature. Neuroinformatics, 1, 81–109. doi: 10.1385/NI:1:1:081
(2012). PsyDis: Towards a diagnosis support system for psychological disorders. Expert Systems With Applications, 39, 11391–11403. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.033
(2009).
(Ontology learning . In S. StaabR. StuderEds., Handbook on ontologies (pp. 245–267). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.2016). Towards computational and behavioral social science. European Psychologist, 21, 131–140. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000257
(1998). Five big, big five issues: Rationale, content, structure, status, and crosscultural assessment. European Psychologist, 3, 113–124. doi: 10.1027//1016-9040.3.2.113
(2008). Advances in web semantics I. Ontologies, web services and applied semantic web. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
(1999). Psychological assessment: Future challenges and progress. European Psychologist, 4, 248–262. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.4.4.248
(2007). A framework to support automated classification and labeling of brain electromagnetic patterns. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2007, 14567. doi: 10.1155/2007/14567
(2007). Thesaurus of psychological index terms (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2010). Content value chains modelling using a copyright ontology. Information Systems, 35, 483–495. doi: 10.1016/j.is.2008.12.001
(2008). The neuroscience information framework: A data and knowledge environment for neuroscience. Neuroinformatics, 6, 149–160. doi: 10.1007/s12021-008-9024-z
(2004). Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic maps! Making sense of it all. Journal of Information Science, 30, 378–391. doi: 10.1177/0165551504045856
(2015). Emotions ontology for collaborative modelling and learning of emotional responses. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 610–617. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.100
(2002). Knowledge engineering and knowledge management. Ontologies and the semantic web, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, EKAW. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/3-540-45810-7
(1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5, 199–220. doi: 10.1006/knac.1993.1008
(2011). The PhenX toolkit: Get the most from your measures. American Journal of Epidemiology, 174, 253–260. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr193
(2014). Evaluating the emotion ontology through the use in the self-reporting of emotional responses at an academic conference. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 5, 38. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-38
(2014). Interdisciplinary perspectives on the development, integration, and application of cognitive ontologies. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 8, 62. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00062
(2012). Ontologies for human behavior analysis and their application to clinical data. International Review of Neurobiology, 103, 89–107. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-388408-4.00005-8
(2005). Cyberinfrastructure for e-science. Science, 308, 817–821. doi: 10.1126/science.1110410
(2014). An overview of ontologies and data resources in medical domains. Expert Systems With Applications, 41, 5158–5166. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.045
(2013). The neurological disease ontology. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 4, 42–51. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-4-42
(2013). Towards structured sharing of raw and derived neuroimaging data across existing resources. NeuroImage, 82, 647–661. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.094
(2013). NeuroLex.org: An online framework for neuroscience knowledge. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 18. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00018
(2005). A framework for modeling health behavior protocols and their linkage to behavioral theory. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 38, 270–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.12.001
(2016). Web ontologies to categorialy structure reality: Representations of human emotional, cognitive, and motivational processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00551
(2010). Measuring taxonomic consistency of ontologies using lexical semantic relatedness. IEEE, 10, 242–247. doi: 10.1109/ICDIM.2010.5664672
(1998). Psychology in Europe: Developments, challenges, and opportunities. European Psychologist, 3, 93–101. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.3.2.93
(2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 81–95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
(2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6, e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
. (2012). The National center for biomedical ontology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19, 190–195. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000523
. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology (No. SMI-2001–0880). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
(1923). The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
(2015). Ontology matching: A literature review. Expert Systems With Applications, 42, 949–971. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.032
(2017). Ontology-based deep learning for human behavior prediction with explanations in health social networks. Information Sciences, 384, 298–313. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.038
(2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
(2011). The cognitive atlas: Toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 5, 1–11. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00017
(2007). Unobtrusive integration of data management with fMRI analysis. Neuroinformatics, 5, 3–10. doi: 10.1385/NI:5:1:3
(2015). Structuring situational information. A road map of the multiple pathways to different situational taxonomies. European Psychologist, 20, 176–189. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000225
(2015). Enrich classifications in psychiatry with textual data: An ontology for psychiatry including social concepts. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 210, 221–223. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-221
(2007). Biomedical ontologies: A functional perspective. Briefings in BioInformatics, 9, 75–90. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbm059
(2009).
(Ontologies for formal representation of biological systems . In S. StaabR. StuderEds., Handbook on ontologies (pp. 445–461). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.2012). Three ontologies to define phenotype measurement data. Frontiers in Genetics, 3, 87. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00087
(2003).
(Ontology . In L. FloridiEd., Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information (pp. 155–166). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.2006). Towards a reference terminology for ontology research and development in the biomedical domain. Paper presented at the KR-MED 2006, Biomedical Ontology in Action, Baltimore, Maryland
(1996). Psychological research supported by the European science foundation. European Psychologist, 1, 65–67. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.1.1.65
(2009).
(Application of ontologies in bioinformatics . In S. StaabR. StuderEds., Handbook on ontologies (pp. 735–756). Berlin, Germany: Springer.2009). Modular ontologies. Concepts, theories and techniques for knowledge modularization. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
(2010).
(Ontological evaluation and validation . In R. PoliM. HealyA. KameasEds., Theory and applications of ontology: Computer applications (pp. 115–130). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.2012). The cognitive paradigm ontology: Design and application. Neuroinformatics, 10, 57–66. doi: 10.1007/s12021-011-9126-x
(2009).
(Ontology evaluation . In S. StaabR. StuderEds., Handbook on ontologies (pp. 293–313). Berlin, Germany: Springer.2014). Discovering beaten paths in collaborative ontology-engineering projects using Markov chains. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 51, 254–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.06.004
(2001). Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 39, 51–74. doi: 10.1016/S0169-023X(01)00030-1
(2011). BioPortal: Enhanced functionality via new web services from the National center for biomedical ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications. Nucleic Acids Research, 39, W541–W545. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr469
(2010). Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: Building a cumulative science of human brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 489–496. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.004
(2010). Achieving high research reporting quality through the use of computational ontologies. Neuroinformatics, 8, 261–271. doi: 10.1007/s12021-010-9079-5
(