Immersive Virtual Environments’ Impact on Individual and Collective Creativity
A Review of Recent Research
Abstract
Abstract. This paper explores the recent advances in research concerning the impact of immersive virtual environments affordances on the expression of users’ creativity at individual and team levels. While the top virtual reality (VR) application areas are entertainment and gaming, simulation and training for professionals, research in the domain of the psychology of creativity and VR is advancing rapidly in Europe. Indeed, between 2014 and 2021, 72% of publications in this domain resulted from European research in diverse fields such as engineering, design, music composition, art-making, and so forth. These studies took advantage of advanced VR affordances, such as head and hand motion trackers to synchronize an avatar in real-time, live streaming of a video into a VR headset screen to create artwork, etc. Four main topics were explored: (a) new creativity techniques involving a virtual upgrade of traditionally used techniques, virtual sketching and prototyping, as well as sophisticated interactive virtual menus and motion tracking systems, (b) the right digital self-representation for enhancing creativity and the degree to which users identify with the “persona avatar” in the context of user-centered innovations, (c) the impact of physical and social virtual contextual cues on creative performance, and (d) the perception of virtual reality by creativity and innovation professionals. Our review confirms that VR supports greater creative performance at individual and collaborative levels as well as enjoyment and fun. However, as rich and varied as this literature has become, it presents major methodological limitations that should be addressed in future research.
References
2014). Fostering team creativity in virtual worlds. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 7(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v7i3.7062
(2016).
(Virtual worlds supporting collaborative creativity . In Y. SivanEd., Handbook on 3D3C Platforms: Progress in IS (pp. 103–121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22041-3_42018). Virtual reality and its potential for Europe. Ecorys. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/vr_ecosystem_eu_report_0.pdf
(2013).
(Creative virtual environments: Effect of supraliminal priming on team brainstorming . In IEEEEd., 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 215–224). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.1522015). Creativity in virtual spaces: Communication modes employed during collaborative online music composition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.06.002
(2016).
(Virtual environment for creative and collaborative learning . In S. KunifujiG. PapadopoulosA. SkulimowskiJ. KacprzykEds., Knowledge, information and creativity support systems. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 416, pp. 371–381). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27478-2_262012). Designing future products: What difficulties do designers encounter and how can their creative process be supported? Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 41(Suppl 1), 5296–5303. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0020-5296
(2020). Enhancing collaborative creativity with virtual dynamic personas. Applied Ergonomics, 82, Article 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102949
(2016). Enhancing collective creative design: An exploratory study on the influence of static and dynamic personas in a virtual environment. The Design Journal, 19(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1129145
(2018).
(Do virtual environments unleash everyone’s creative potential? In S. BagnaraR. TartagliaS. AlbolinoT. AlexanderY. FujitaEds., Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 824, pp. 1–2). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_1342017). Engineering students’ use of creativity and development tools in conceptual product design: What, when and how? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.016
(2020). The expression of users’ creative potential in virtual and real environments: An exploratory study. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712162
(2011). Mesure de la capacité des personas à générer des idées dans la conception de projets WEB
([Measurement of the ability of personas to generate ideas in the design of WEB projects] . Le Travail Humain, 75(2), 121–145.1998). Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29(4), 495–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498294005
(2019). Creativity in virtual teams: Bridging the gap between professional wisdom and scientific insights. Creativity Studies, 12(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2019.576
(2020). Proteus vs. social identity effects on virtual brainstorming. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(5), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1605408
(2017).
(Technological innovation in group creativity . In F. DarbellayZ. MoodyT. LubartEds., Creativity, design thinking and interdisciplinarity. Creativity in the twenty first century (pp. 185–201). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_122016). Using avatars to tailor ideation process to innovation strategy. Cognition, Technology & Work, 18(3), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0378-y
(2010). Creativity in the age of emerging technology: Some issues and perspectives in 2010. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00559.x
(2014).
(A computational model of social attitudes for a virtual recruiter . In A. LomuscioP. ScerriA. BazzanM. HuhnsEds., Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (pp. 93–100). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.2020). Effects of virtual reality on creative design performance and creative experiential learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1821717
(2020, October 28). How to kill a Greek God – A review, critique, and meta-analysis of 14 years of Proteus effect research. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9rbcs
(1999). Virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474699566152
(2016). Compulsive creativity: Virtual worlds, disability, and digital capital. International Journal of Communication, 10, 2096–2118.
(2017).
(The creative Proteus Effect: How self-similarity, embodiment, and priming of creative stereotypes with avatars influences creative ideation . In ACMEd., Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C ‘17) (pp. 232–236). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.30788562015).
(Meta_Body: Virtual corporeality as a shared creative process . In D. DoyleEd., New opportunities for artistic practice in virtual worlds (pp. 187–214). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8384-6.ch0092019).
(Creative collaborative virtual environments . In M. Khosrow-PourEd., Advanced methodologies and technologies in artificial intelligence, computer simulation, and human-computer interaction (pp. 461–473). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7368-5.ch0342020). Studying the effects of visual movement on creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100661
(2015).
(How communication modalities can impact group creativity in multi-user virtual environments . In ACMEd., ECCE ‘15: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015 (pp. 1–4). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2788412.27884392018).
(VRBox: A virtual reality augmented sandbox for immersive playfulness, creativity and exploration . In CHIEd., CHI PLAY ‘18 The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 153–162). CHI. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.32426972020, March).
(The effects of virtual reality affordances and constraints on negative group effects during brainstorming sessions . In DBLPEd., 15th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Potsdam, Germany (pp. 1172–1187). DBLP.2017). Paint with me: Stimulating creativity and empathy while painting with a painter in virtual reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(4), 1418–1426. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2657239
(2017). Riding waves of change: A review of Personas research landscape based on the Three Waves of HCI. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (pp. 605–616). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_49
(2016). Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.024
(2020). Dreamlike and playful virtual environments to inspire children’s divergent thinking. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 33(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000279
(2019).
((Social) identity and creativity in virtual settings: Review of processes and research agenda . In I. LebudaV. GlăveanuEds., The Palgrave handbook of social creativity research: Palgrave studies in creativity and culture (pp. 191–207). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_132017). The relationship between contextual cues in virtual environments and creative processes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0503
(2017). Social identity cues to improve creativity and identification in face-to-face and virtual groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.043
(2009). Co-creating external design representations: Comparing face-to-face sketching to designing in virtual environments. CoDesign International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 5(2), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880902921422
(2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. Sage.
(2019). Architectural design creativity in multi-user virtual environment: A comparative analysis between remote collaboration media. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(5), 826–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317733267
(2016). Enablers and barriers of the multi-user virtual environment for exploratory creativity in architectural design collaboration. CoDesign, 12(3), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081239
(2019). Virtual vs. actual body: applicability of anthropomorphic avatars to enhance exploratory creativity in architectural design education. Architectural Science Review, 62(6), 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1669526
(2016). Effects of virtual reality integrated creative thinking instruction on students’ creative thinking abilities. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 12(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1226a
(2007).
(The visual appearance of user’s avatar can influence the manipulation of both real devices and virtual objects . In IEEEEd., Proceedings of the 3DUI 2007 Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2007.3407672011). Avatar-based innovation: Consequences of the virtual co-creation experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.019
(2015). The use of virtual reality for creating unusual environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745426
(2015). Embodying and programming a constellation of multimodal literacy practices: Computational thinking, creative movement, biology, & virtual environment interactions. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 11(2), 64–93.
(2017). Aspects regarding virtual reality as innovation in creative industries. Revista Romana de Sociologie, 28(3–4), 157–172.
(2018). Design in context of use: An experiment with a multi-view and multi-representation system for collaborative design. Computers in Industry, 103, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.09.006
(2014). My avatar is pregnant! Representation of pregnancy, birth, and maternity in a virtual world. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.058
(2005). How can computers be partners in the creative process: Classification and commentary on the Special Issue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.101/j.ijhcs.2005.04.002
(2019).
(Being yourself to be creative: how self-similar avatars can support the generation of original ideas in virtual environments . In ACMEd., Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 285–293). ACM.2018).
(LeMo: Supporting collaborative music making in virtual reality . In IEEEEd., 2018 IEEE 4th VR workshop on Sonic Interactions for Virtual Environments (SIVE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIVE.2018.85770942019).
(LeMo: Exploring virtual space for collaborative creativity . In ACMEd., Proceedings of the 2019 on creativity and cognition, C&C ‘19 (pp. 71–82). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.33254952019). Designing spaces to support collaborative creativity in shared virtual environments. PeerJ Computer Science, 5, Article e229. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.229
(2019). “I’d like to be under the sea”: Contextual cues in virtual environments influence the orientation of idea generation. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.001
(1999). Physical ergonomics of virtual environment use. Applied Ergonomics, 30(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00045-3
(2020). The influence of virtual reality on design process creativity in basic design studios. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1858116
(2003, June).
(Personas: Practice and theory . In ACMEd., Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for user experiences (pp. 1–15). ACM.2020). Avatar characteristics induce users’ behavioral conformity with small-to-medium effect sizes: A meta-analysis of the Proteus effect. Media Psychology, 23(5), 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1623698
(1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomenon. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
(2020). Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096
(1984). Mindplay. Harvard Magazine, 86(4), 16–19.
(2020). User representations in human-computer interaction. Human–Computer Interaction, 36(5–6), 400–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2020.1724790
(2020). The ethics of realism in virtual and augmented reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.00001
(1992).
(Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication . In M. LeaEd., Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30–65). HarvesterWheatsheaf.1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021004001
(1979).
(An integrative theory of intergroup conflict . In W. G. AustinS. WorchelEds., The social psychology of intergroup relation (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.2018). Comprehending products with mixed reality: Geometric relationships and creativity. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979018809599
(2008). Cues to identity in online dyads: Effects of interpersonal versus intragroup perceptions on performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(2), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.12.2.96
(2016). Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: Under recognized potential among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.102
(2010). Creative problem solving in second life: An action research study. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00550.x
(1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8
(2019).
(Sketching immersive information spaces: Lessons learned from experiments in “sketching for and through virtual reality” . In N. SteinøM. KrausEds., 7th eCAADe Regional International Symposium: Virtually Real (pp. 25–36). Aalborg University.2015).
(Content, collaboration, and creativity in virtual worlds . In G. P. GreenJ. C. KaufmanEds., Video games and creativity (pp. 119–136). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801462-2.00006-02011). Creative expression in virtual worlds: Imitation, imagination, and individualized collaboration. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(S), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/2160-4134.1.S.32
(2019). Which EEG feedback works better for creativity performance in immersive virtual reality: The reminder or encouraging feedback? Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.002
(2018). Examining creativity through a virtual reality support system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1231–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9604-z
(2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299
(2009). The difference between being and seeing: The relative contribution of self-perception and priming to behavioral changes via digital self-representation. Media Psychology, 12(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260902849943
(