Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.3.138

Abstract. Based on the recent findings that show evidence in favor of five rather than three prototypes in Big Five questionnaire data, the main aim of this study was to evaluate a five-cluster solution. The cluster solution is compared with a Big Five variable-centered approach regarding their relative utility in the concurrent prediction of social attitudes in an adult, nonstudent sample. In addition to the Big Five personality variables, we also assessed social attitudes (generalized prejudice, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation) and resiliency. Performing head-to-head comparisons to evaluate the goodness of cluster-solutions, our study again provides strong evidence that the five-cluster solution is superior to the three-cluster solution. The results also suggest that in fair comparisons (e.g., dichotomized Big Five scores) the typological approach can compete with the dimensional approach in predicting criterion variables. Furthermore, we have been able to show that the typological approach based on Big Five personality variables can lead to reasonable predictions and new insights with respect to social attitudes and ideological belief systems.

References

  • Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • ALLBUS (2002). Ethnocentrism scale. Zentralarchiv für empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) & Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) e.V. Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfragen der Sozialwissenschaften (ALLBUS). [General Population Survey of the Social Sciences]. Köln: ZA & ZUMA e.V. (1996-2002) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Allport, G.M. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Manitoba, Canada: University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). Orlando, FL: Academic Press First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J.B. (2003). Head-to-head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions. European Journal of Personality, 77, 327–346 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J.B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., van Aken, M.A.G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169–198 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Avedeyeva, T.V., Church, A.T. (2005). The cross-cultural generalizability of personality types: A Philippine study. European Journal of Personality, 19, 451–474 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO personality inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16, 43–55 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bierly, M.M. (1985). Prejudice toward contemporary outgroups as a generalized attitude. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 189–199 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blashfield, R.K., Aldenderfer, M.S. (1988). The methods and problems of cluster analysis. In J.R. Nesselroade & R.B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 447-473). New York: Plenum First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Block, J. (1971). Lives through time. Berkeley: Bancroft Books First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Block, J., Kremen, A.M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349–361 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Block, J.H., Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W.A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota symposium of child psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Block, J., Block, J.H. (2006a). Venturing a 30-year longitudinal study. American Psychologist, 61, 315–327 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Block, J., Block, J.H. (2006b). Nursery school personality and political orientation 2 decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 734–749 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boehm, B., Asendorpf, J.B., Avia, M.D. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality: Spanish NEO-PI samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, 25–41 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae. Handanweisung. [The NEO-Five-Factor Inventory. Manual]. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, J.C. (2000). Personality and emotional correlates of right-wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 1–14 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development across the life-course. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 311-388). New York: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caspi, A., Harrington, H., Milne, B., Amell, J.W., Theodore, R.F., Moffitt, T.E. (2003). Children's behavioral styles at age 3 are linked to their adult personality traits at age 26. Journal of Personality, 71, 495–514 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caspi, A., Silva, P.A. (1995). Temperamental qualities at age 3 predict personality traits in young adulthood: Longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort. Child Development, 66, 486–498 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cornelis, I., van Hiel, A. (2006). The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism-based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 37–50 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., Herbst, J.H., McCrae, R.R., Samuels, J., Ozer, D.J. (2002). The replicability and utility of three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16, 73–87 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Fruyt, F., Mervilde, I., van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16, 57–72 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75– 93 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable- and a person-centered approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449–464 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters more to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism?. European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hart, D., Burock, D., London, B., Atkins, R., Bonilla-Santiago, G. (2005). The relation of personality types to physiological, behavioral, and cognitive processes. European Journal of Personality, 19, 391–407 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herzberg, P.Y., Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? An extension of personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20, 5–28 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, J.W., Poulsen, J.R. (2005). Contact experiences mediate the relationship between five-factor model personality traits and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 667–685 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O.P., Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods to classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In L.M. Necam & J. Neyman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium of Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1965/66 (Vol. 1, pp. 281-297). Berkeley: University of California Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Milligan, G.W., Cooper, M.C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petzel, T., Wagner, U., Nicolai, K., van Dick, R. (1997). Ein kurzes Instrument zur Messung der Autoritarismus-Neigung [Short authoritarianism scale]. Gruppendynamik, 28, 251–258 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Plant, E.A., Devine, P.G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., Borkenau, P. (2004). Resilients, overcontrollers, and undercontrollers: The replicability of the three personality prototypes across informants. European Journal of Personality, 18, 1–14 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Riemann, R., Grubich, C., Hempel, S., Mergl, S., Richter, M. (1993). Personality and attitudes toward current political topics. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 313–321 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, R.W., John, O.P., Caspi, A. (1998). The typological approach for studying personality. In R.B. Cairns, L.R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 135-160). Beverly Hills: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schumacher, J., Leppert, K., Gunzelmann, T., Strauss, B., Brähler, E. (2005). Die Resilienzskala - Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit als Personmerkmal. [The Resilience Scale - A questionnaire for the assessment of resilience as a personality characteristic] Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 53, 16–39 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Hiel, A., Mervielde, I. (2004). Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships with cultural and economic conservative beliefs. Journal of Personality, 72, 659–686 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Leeuwen, K., De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I. (2004). A longitudinal study of the utility of the resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types as predictors of children's and adolescents' problem behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 210–220 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • von Collani, G. (2002). Das Konstrukt der Sozialen Dominanzorientierung als generalisierte Einstellung: eine Replikation. [The construct of social dominance orientation as a generalized attitude: A replication] Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 10, 262–283 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wagnild, G.M., Young, H.M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1, 165–178 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ward, J.H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • York, K.L., John, O.P. (1992). The four faces of Eve: A typological analysis of women's personality at midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 494–508 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar