Skip to main content
Original Article

Use of Strategy in a 3-Dimensional Spatial Ability Test

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000013

Use of strategy was investigated using a new spatial test in which items are presented in three-dimensional space and solutions are actively constructed rather than selected from alternatives. As the final test also comprises a training module, the focus of a first evaluation study was on the strategies participants use and their relationship to performance. Participants were interviewed after completing the test. The number of strategies reported and two specific strategies were significantly correlated to the test score. Implications of the findings for strategy assessment and test design are discussed.

References

  • Cochran, K.F. , Wheatley, G.H. (1989). Ability and sex-related differences in cognitive strategies on spatial tasks. The Journal of General Psychology, 116, 43–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dünser, A. (2005). Trainierbarkeit der Raumvorstellung mit Augmented Reality [Trainability of spatial ability with augmented reality]. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of Vienna. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Glück, J. , Fitting, S. (2003). Spatial strategy selection: Interesting incremental information. International Journal of Testing, 3, 293–308. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Just, M.A. , & Carpenter, P.A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92, 137–172. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaufmann, H., Csisinko, M. , Strasser, I., Strauss, S., Koller, I. , Glück, J. (2008). Design of a virtual reality supported test for spatial abilities. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Geometry and Graphics (ICGG), Dresden, Germany, pp. 122–123. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaufmann, H. , Steinbügl, K. , Dünser, A. , Glück, J. (2005). General training of spatial abilities by geometry education in augmented reality. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine: A Decade of VR, 3, 65–76. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kyllonen, P.C., Lohman, D.F. , Woltz, D.J. (1984). Componential modeling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1325–1345. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lohman, D.F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R.J. Sternberg, (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 181–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lohman, D.F. , Kyllonen, P.C. (1983). Individual differences in solution strategy on spatial tasks. In D.F. Dillon R.R. Schmeck, Eds., Individual differences in cognition (pp. 105–135). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis. Foundations and techniques]. Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmalstieg, D., Fuhrmann, A., Hesina, G. , Szalavári, Z.S. , Encarnacao, L.M., Gervautz, M. et al. (2002). The Studierstube augmented reality project. Presence – Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(1), 33–54. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Souvignier, E. (2000). Förderung räumlicher Fähigkeiten [Advancement of spatial abilities]. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar