Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Original Article

I Guess You’re Just Not My Type

Personality Types and Similarity Between Types as Predictors of Satisfaction in Intimate Couples

Published Online:January 01, 2013https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000105

Abstract

We examined the relevance of personality to relationship satisfaction in intimate couples from a typological point of view. Based on a sample of 133 couples, relationship satisfaction was predicted by the personality types of both relationship partners (each self-rated and partner-rated) resulting from the Big Five factors. Furthermore, interrater agreement of personality type and dyadic similarity were also used as predictors. The results showed that self-rated personality was hardly instrumental in predicting relationship satisfaction. For both sexes, relationship satisfaction seemed to depend mainly on how the person‘s personality was rated by his or her partner. Neither interrater agreement nor dyadic similarity had any influence on the relationship satisfaction of men or women. The applicability of the typological approach in this area of research is discussed.

References

  • Asendorpf, J. B. (2003). Head-to-head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions. European Journal of Personality, 77, 327–346. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B. (2007). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit [Psychology of Personality]. Berlin, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B. , Borkenau, P. , Ostendorf, F. , van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169–198. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B. , Denissen, J. J. A. (2006). Predictive validity of personality types versus personality dimensions from early childhood to adulthood: Implications for the distinction between core and surface traits. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 486–513. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B. , van Aken, M. (1999). Resilient, overcontrolled and undercontrolled personality prototypes in childhood: Replicability, predictive power, and the trait-type issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 815–832. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barelds, D. P. H. (2005). Self and partner personality in intimate relationships. European Journal of Personality, 19, 501–518. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barelds, D. P. H. , Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2006). Partner personality in distressed relationships. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 392–396. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barri, L. , Morgan, M. (2011). Soulmates, compatibility and intimacy: Allied discursive resources in the struggle for relationship satisfaction in the new millennium. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 10–23. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beach, S. R. H. , Katz, J. , Kim, S. , Brody, G. H. (2003). Prospective effects of marital satisfaction on depressive symptoms in established marriages: A dyadic model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 355–371. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blashfield, R. K. , Aldenderfer, M. S. (1988). The methods and problems of cluster analysis. In J. R. Nesselroade R. B. CattellEds., Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 447–473). New York: Plenum. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Block, J. H. , Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and egoresiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins, (Ed.), Minnesota symposium of child psychology (pp. 39–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. , Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae [NEO-Five-Factor-Inventory (NEO-FFI) by Costa and McCrae]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Botwin, M. D. , Buss, D. M. , Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five Factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107–136. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. , Herbst, J. H. , McCrae, R. R. , Samuels, J. , Ozer, D. J. (2002). The replicability and utility of three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16, 73–87. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. , McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Decuyper, M., De Bolle, M., De Fruyt, F. (2012). Personality similarity, perceptual accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 19, 128–145. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Donnellan, M. B. , Assad, K. K. , Robins, R. W. , Conger, R. D. (2007). Do negative interactions mediate the effects of negative emotionality, communal positive emotionality, and constraint on relationship satisfaction? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 557–573. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dymond, R. (1954). Interpersonal perception and marital happiness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 8, 164–171. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dyrenforth, P. S. , Kashy, D. A. , Donnellan, M. B. , Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 690–702. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eaton, N. , Krueger, R. F. , South, C. , Simms, L. J. , Clark, L. A. (2011). Contrasting prototypes and dimensions in the classification of personality pathology: Evidence that dimensions, but not prototypes, are robust. Psychological Medicine, 41, 1151–1163. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Figueredo, A. J. , Sefcek, J. A. , Jones, D. N. (2006). The ideal romantic partner personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 431–441. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fincham, F. D. , Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Relationship satisfaction. In A. L. Vangelisti D. PerlmanEds., The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 579–594). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fletcher, G. J. O. , Kerr, P. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627–658. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gattis, K. S. , Berns, S. , Simpson, L. , Christensen, A. (2004). Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 564–574. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gaunt, R. (2006). Couple Similarity and Marital Satisfaction: Are Similar Spouses Happier? Journal of Personality, 74, 1401–1420. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–6494.2006.00414.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Geist, R. L. , Gilbert, D. G. (1996). Correlates of expressed and felt emotion during marital conflict: Satisfaction, personality, process, and outcome. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 49–60. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gonzaga, G. C. , Campos, B. , Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 34–48. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hank, G. , Hahlweg, K. , Klann, N. (1990). Diagnostische Verfahren für Berater [Diagnostic inventories for counselors]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Test Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heller, D. , Watson, D. , Ilies, R. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 574–600. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herzberg, P. Y. (2009). Beyond “accident-proneness”: Using Five-Factor Model prototypes to predict driving behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1096–1100. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herzberg, P. Y. , Roth, M. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? A new perspective on personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20, 5–28. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • John, O. P. , Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin O. P. JohnEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karney, B. R. , Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Karney, B. R. , Bradbury, T. N. , Fincham, F. D. , Sullivan, K. T. (1994). The role of negative affectivity in the association between attributions and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 413–424. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kelly, E. L. , Conley, J. J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 27–40. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klimstra, T. , Hale, W. , Raaijmakers, Q. , Branje, S. , Meeus, W. (2010). A developmental typology of personality. European Journal of Personality, 24, 309–323. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kosek, R. B. (1996). The quest for a perfect spouse: Spousal ratings and marital satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 79, 731–735. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Luo, S. , Chen, H. , Yue, G. , Zhang, G. , Zhaoyang, R. , Xu, D. (2008). Predicting marital satisfaction from self, partner, and couple characteristics: Is it me, you, or us? Journal of Personality, 76, 1231–1266. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luo, S. , Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in Newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304–326. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Malouff, J. M. , Thorsteinsson, E. B. , Schutte, N. S. , Bhullar, N. , Rooke, S. E. (2010). The Five-Factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 124–127. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mandara, J. (2003). The typological approach in child and family psychology: A review of theory, methods, and research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 129–146. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meeus, W., van de Schoot, R., Klimstra, T., Branje, S. (2011). Change and stability of personality types in adolescence: A five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1181–1195. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Murray, S. L. , Holmes, J. G. , Bellavia, G. , Griffin, D. W. , Dolderman, D. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563–581. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Neyer, F. J. , Voigt, D. (2004). Personality and social network effects on romantic relationships: A dyadic approach. European Journal of Personality, 18, 279–299. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pulkinnen, L. (1996). Female and male personality styles: A typological and developmental analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1288–1306. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B. , Riemann, R. , Angleitner, A. , Borkenau, P. (2004). Resilients, overcontrollers, and undercontrollers: The replicability of the three personality prototypes across informants. European Journal of Personality, 18, 1–14. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B. , Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent survive: Personality similarities in couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 533–535. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Robins, R. W. , Caspi, A. , Moffitt, T. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners’ personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 251–259. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Robins, R. W. , John, O. P. , Caspi, A. , Moffitt, T. E. , Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys. Three replicable types. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 157–171. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roth, M. , Collani, G. v. (2007). A head-to-head comparison of Big-Five types and traits in the prediction of social attitudes: Further evidence for a five-cluster typology. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 138–149. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Rövik, J. O. , Tyssen, R. , Gude, T. , Moum, T. , Ekeberg, O. , Vaglum, P. (2007). Exploring the interplay between personality dimensions: A comparison of the typological and the dimensional approach in stress research. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1255–1266. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schoenborn, C. A. (2004). Marital status and health: United States, 1999–2002. Advance Data, 351, 1–36. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shiota, M. N. , Levenson, R. W. (2007). Birds of a feather don’t always fly farthest: Similarity in Big Five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychology and Aging, 22, 666–675. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D. , Hubbard, B. , Wiese, D. (2000a). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality, 68, 413–449. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D. , Hubbard, B. , Wiese, D. (2000b). Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546–558. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watson, D. , Klohnen, E. C. , Casillas, A., Nus Simms, E., Haig, J., Berry, D. S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72, 1029–1068. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zentner, M. R. (2005). Ideal mate personality concepts and compatibility in close relationships: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 242–256. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zimmermann, A. C. , Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and happiness in Germany. Population and Development Review, 32, 511–528. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar