Nonlinear Effects of Cognitive Ability on Economic Productivity
A Country-Level Analysis
Abstract
Abstract. Cognitive capitalism theory argues that the positive effects of cognitive ability on economic productivity should increase nonlinearly, with increases in ability amplifying increases in productivity. The theory was tested using country-level indicators of cognitive ability and productivity. Cognitive ability was based on international student assessments (e.g., Program for International Student Assessment, PISA), and productivity was based on economic inputs (e.g., scientific achievements and competitiveness) and outputs (e.g., gross domestic product). As predicted, the effects of cognitive ability on all productivity measures increased nonlinearly at higher levels of ability, suggesting that higher ability levels disproportionately boost a nation’s productivity. The findings are discussed in light of standard theories of cognitive ability (e.g., Spearman’s law of diminishing returns and differentiation theories), and suggest that interventions that boost cognitive ability can have large, amplifying effects on economic productivity.
References
2013). The first update of the Maddison Project. Re-estimating growth before 1820 (Maddison-Project Working Paper WP-4). Retrieved from www.ggdc.net/maddison/maddison-project/data/mpd_2013-01.xlsx
(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2015). Relations among general intelligence (g), aptitude tests, and GPA: Linear effects dominate. Intelligence, 53, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.005
(2013). Spearman’s law of diminishing returns and national ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 406–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.023
(2016). Cognitive capitalism: Economic freedom moderates the effects of intellectual and average classes on economic productivity. Psychological Reports, 119, 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116659854
(2013). Global wealth databook 2013. Zurich, Switzerland: Credit Suisse.
. (1996). Intelligence and the differentiation hypothesis. Intelligence, 23, 105–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(96)90008-2
(Dutta, S.Lanvin, B. (Eds.). (2013). The Global Innovation Index 2013: The local dynamics of innovation. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/economics/gii/gii_2013.pdf
2016). The functional intelligences proposition. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.057
(2013). Economic freedom of the world. 2013 Annual report. Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute. Retrieved from https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/economic-freedom-of-the-world-2013.pdf
(2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19, 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014
(1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
(2016). Hive mind: How your Nation’s IQ matters so much more than your own. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
(2009). Exceptional cognitive ability: The phenotype. Behavior Genetics, 39, 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9273-0
(2012). National IQs: A review of their educational, cognitive, economic, political, demographic, sociological, epidemiological, geographic and climatic correlates. Intelligence, 40, 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.11.004
(2008). Statistics on world population, GDP and per capita GDP, 1–2008 AD. Retrieved from http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/Historical_Statistics/horizontal-file_02-2010.xls
(2012). National IQ and economic outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.022
(2013). 2013 index of economic freedom. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved from www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2013/book/index_2013.pdf
(2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02007.x
(2015). One century of global IQ gains. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 282–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615577701
(2007). The g-factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: The homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-tests across nations. European Journal of Personality, 21, 667–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.634
(2012). Intellectual classes, technological progress and economic development: The rise of cognitive capitalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.001
(2013). African cognitive ability: Research, results, divergences and recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.022
(2015). Cognitive capital, good governance, and the wealth of nations. Intelligence, 51, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.06.002
(2009). The impact of smart fractions, cognitive ability of politicians and average competence of peoples on social development. Talent Development and Excellence, 1, 3–25.
(2011). Cognitive capitalism: The effect of cognitive ability on wealth, as mediated through scientific achievement and economic freedom. Psychological Science, 22, 754–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611407207
(2013). Ability rise in NAEP and narrowing ethnic gaps? Intelligence, 41, 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.016
(2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410391442
(2013). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
(2013). National intelligence and personality: Their relationships and impact on national economic success. Intelligence, 41, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.11.003
(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
(2013). Is the Flynn effect on g? A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 41, 802–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.001
(2013). Investigating America’s elite: Cognitive ability, education, and sex differences. Intelligence, 41, 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.005
(2007). What is the national g-factor? European Journal of Personality, 21, 763–765. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.648
(2012). The social and scientific temporal correlates of genotypic intelligence and the Flynn effect. Intelligence, 40, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.12.002
(