Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Adults’ Sex Difference in a Dynamic Mental Rotation Task

Validating Infant Results

Published Online:January 12, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000248

Abstract

Abstract. With the Mental Rotation Test (MRT), large and reliable sex differences are found. Used with children younger than about 9 or 10 years, MRT performance is at chance level. Simpler tasks used with younger children have revealed inconclusive results. Moore and Johnson (2008, 2011) observed sex differences in infants using a habituation task with 3D cube figures rotating back and forth in depth through a 240° angle. Thereafter, female infants treated similarly the original figure and a mirror-image cube figure presented revolving through the previously unseen 120° angle, whereas male infants behaved as if they recognized the familiar object. In the present study, 256 adults participated in the MRT as well as in a modified two-alternative forced-choice dynamic version of the infants’ task. Sex differences were present for both tasks. More importantly, there was a positive correlation in performance across both tasks for both women and men. Since the new task turned out to be simpler, it might be suitable also for children. We present the first, although indirect, evidence that the sex effects reported by Moore and Johnson might indeed reflect early sex differences in mental rotation.

References

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ekstrom, R., French, J. W. & Harman, H. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frick, A., Möhring, W. & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Development of mental transformation abilities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 536–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hahn, N., Jansen, P. & Heil, M. (2010a). Preschoolers’ mental rotation: Sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1244–1250. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21236 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hahn, N., Jansen, P. & Heil, M. (2010b). Preschoolers’ mental rotation of letters: Sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2010.485248 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hunter, M. A., Ames, E. W. & Koopman, R. (1983). Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarization time on infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 19, 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.19.3.338 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jansen, P. & Heil, M. (2010). Gender differences in mental rotation across adulthood. Experimental Aging Research, 36, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730903422762 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jansen-Osmann, P. & Heil, M. (2007). Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 64, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.03.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Levine, S. C., Foley, A., Lourenco, S., Ehrlich, S. & Ratliff, K. (2016). Sex differences in spatial cognition: Advancing the conversation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Cognitive Science, 7, 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1380 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moore, D. S. & Johnson, S. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science, 19, 1063–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02200.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moore, D. S. & Johnson, S. P. (2011). Mental rotation of dynamic, three-dimensional stimuli by 3-month-old infants. Infancy, 16, 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00058.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Neuburger, S., Jansen, P., Heil, M. & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2011). Gender differences in pre-adolescent’s mental rotation performance: Do they depend on grade und stimuli? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1238–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.017 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peters, M. (2005). Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems. Brain and Cognition, 57, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.052 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R. & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28, 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1032 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peters, M., Lehmann, W., Takahira, S., Takeuchi, Y. & Jordan, K. (2006). Mental rotation test performance in four crosscultural samples (n = 3367): Overall sex differences and the role of academic program in performance. Cortex, 42, 1005–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70206-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Quinn, P. C. & Liben, L. S. (2008). A sex difference in mental rotation in young infants. Psychological Science, 19, 1067–1070. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02201.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Quinn, P. C. & Liben, L. S. (2014). A sex difference in mental rotation in infants: Convergent evidence. Infancy, 19, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12033 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shepard, R. N. & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shepard, R. N. & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Somers, M., Shields, L. S., Boks, M. P., Kahn, R. S. & Sommer, I. E. (2015). Cognitive benefits of right-handedness: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Titze, C., Heil, M. & Jansen, P. (2010). Pairwise presentation of cube figures does not reduce gender differences in mental rotation performance. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000018 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Titze, C., Jansen, P. & Heil, M. (2010). Mental rotations performance and the effect of gender in fourth graders and adults. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620802548214 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg, S. G. & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Voyer, D. (2011). Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 267–277. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0042-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Voyer, D., Butler, T., Cordero, J., Brake, B., Silbersweig, D., Stern, E. & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2006). The relation between computerized and paper-and-pencil mental rotation tasks: A validation study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 928–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390591004310 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S. & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar